![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
|
Friday, July 18, 2003 Couriers and local messengers industry2000 (revised) and 2001 (preliminary)The couriers and local messengers industry enjoyed another strong year of growth in 2001. Operating revenues of businesses in the industry totalled $5.3 billion, up 7% from 2000. However, the impact of this gain was undermined by an even larger increase in operating expenses (+8%). The operating margin - the difference between revenues and expenses - edged down 3% from 2000. This marked the end of two straight years of significant improvement in the industry's profitability. The industry has two main segments: courier companies, which provide mostly next-day or overnight delivery services to national and international destinations, and local messenger businesses, which traditionally provide same-day local delivery service. While couriers accounted for only about 10% of the 18,829 firms in the industry in 2001, they generated roughly 80% of the total operating revenues. Local messengers accounted for 90% of the businesses but only 20% of the operating revenues. The average operating margin was substantially higher for couriers (over $116,000) than for local messengers (just under $10,000) in 2001. In comparison with 2000, however, operating margins declined 5% for couriers but remained steady for local messengers. Firms are also classified by annual revenue: large companies with revenues of $25 million or more, medium-sized firms with revenues from $1 million to $24,999,999, and small companies with less than $1 million in revenues. In 2001, large firms made up about 1% of the total number of businesses in the industry, but earned three quarters of the operating revenues. In contrast, small firms accounted for 98% of the businesses in the industry, but took in only 15% of the operating revenues. Medium-sized companies accounted for 1% of all businesses and 10% of operating revenues. Large firms had the highest operating margins and medium-sized companies had the lowest. In comparison with 2000, small firms reported an 11% increase in their operating margin, while large and medium-sized companies posted declines of 10% and 30%, respectively. Large and medium-size firms delivered nearly 485 million pieces, generating just over $4 billion in delivery revenues in 2001. Both figures represent an increase of about 4% from 2000. Couriers moved 88% of all items and earned 89% of total delivery revenues. Their delivery revenues rose 5%, while local messengers' delivery revenues were virtually unchanged from 2000 to 2001. Next-day and overnight services accounted for more than half of total delivery revenues but just one-third of the total pieces delivered. In contrast, second-day and other services earned only 38% of total delivery revenues, even though they accounted for 56% of all pieces delivered. Ontario remained the dominant province in the industry, as it was the origin of shipment for over half of delivery revenues. Canadian destinations accounted for 80% of delivery revenues; shipments to the United States made up about 16%, up 17% from 2000. Available on CANSIM: tables 402-0001 to 402-0003. A special article, including an analytical text, data tables and graphs, will be available in a few weeks in the Service bulletin - Surface and marine transport (50-002-XIB, $10). To order data, contact Jean-Robert Larocque (613-951-2486, laroque@statcan.gc.ca), Transportation Division. For general information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact Denis Pilon (613-951-2707, denis.pilon@statcan.gc.ca), Transportation Division.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|