Inference and foundations

Filter results by

Search Help
Currently selected filters that can be removed

Keyword(s)

Type

1 facets displayed. 0 facets selected.
Sort Help
entries

Results

All (2)

All (2) ((2 results))

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500214398
    Description:

    We present empirical evidence from 14 surveys in six countries concerning the existence and magnitude of design effects (defts) for five designs of two major types. The first type concerns deft (p_i – p_j), the difference of two proportions from a polytomous variable of three or more categories. The second type uses Chi-square tests for differences from two samples. We find that for all variables in all designs deft (p_i – p_j) \cong [deft (p_i) + deft (p_j)] / 2 are good approximations. These are empirical results, and exceptions disprove the existence of mere analytical inequalities. These results hold despite great variations of defts between variables and also between categories of the same variables. They also show the need for sample survey treatment of survey data even for analytical statistics. Furthermore they permit useful approximations of deft (p_i – p_j) from more accessible deft (p_i) values.

    Release date: 1995-12-15

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500114408
    Description:

    The problem of estimating the median of a finite population when an auxiliary variable is present is considered. Point and interval estimators based on a non-informative Bayesian approach are proposed. The point estimator is compared to other possible estimators and is seen to perform well in a variety of situations.

    Release date: 1995-06-15
Data (0)

Data (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Analysis (2)

Analysis (2) ((2 results))

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500214398
    Description:

    We present empirical evidence from 14 surveys in six countries concerning the existence and magnitude of design effects (defts) for five designs of two major types. The first type concerns deft (p_i – p_j), the difference of two proportions from a polytomous variable of three or more categories. The second type uses Chi-square tests for differences from two samples. We find that for all variables in all designs deft (p_i – p_j) \cong [deft (p_i) + deft (p_j)] / 2 are good approximations. These are empirical results, and exceptions disprove the existence of mere analytical inequalities. These results hold despite great variations of defts between variables and also between categories of the same variables. They also show the need for sample survey treatment of survey data even for analytical statistics. Furthermore they permit useful approximations of deft (p_i – p_j) from more accessible deft (p_i) values.

    Release date: 1995-12-15

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500114408
    Description:

    The problem of estimating the median of a finite population when an auxiliary variable is present is considered. Point and interval estimators based on a non-informative Bayesian approach are proposed. The point estimator is compared to other possible estimators and is seen to perform well in a variety of situations.

    Release date: 1995-06-15
Reference (0)

Reference (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Date modified: