Response and nonresponse

Skip to filters. View results.
View results

Filter results by

Search Help
Currently selected filters that can be removed

Keyword(s)

Type

1 facets displayed. 0 facets selected.
Sort Help
entries

Results

All (4)

All (4) ((4 results))

  • 1. Respondent Relations in Longitudinal Surveys Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994002
    Description:

    This paper describes the experiences of other surveys in dealing with respondents. It also documents several viewpoints and survey findings on incentives and their effect on response rates as well as ways of maintaining interviewer morale.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 2. Measuring Non-response in a Longitudinal Survey: The Experience of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994016
    Description:

    This paper presents various data quality measures proposed for the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID), including wave and panel response rates and measures of the characteristics of non-respondents.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 3. Measurement Issues in the Reporting of Unemployment Insurance Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994017
    Description:

    This study compares the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) respondents reporting of their receipt of unemployment insurance benefits in a 1993 field test with the benchmark of what was reported on their income tax form.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 4. How prenotice letters, stamped return envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionnaires Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500214394
    Description:

    In a 1992 National Test Census the mailing sequence of a prenotice letter, census form, reminder postcard, and replacement census form resulted in an overall mailback response of 63.4 percent. The response was substantially higher than the 49.2 percent response rate obtained in the 1986 National Content Test Census, which also utilized a replacement form mailing. Much of this difference appeared to be the result of the prenotice - census form - reminder sequence, but the extent to which each main effect and interactions contributed to overall response was not known. This paper reports results from the 1992 Census Implementation Test, a test of the individual and combined effectiveness of a prenotice letter, a stamped return envelope and a reminder postcard, on response rates. This was a national sample of households (n = 50,000) conducted in the fall of 1992. A factorial design was used to test all eight possible combinations of the main effects and interactions. Logistic regression and multiple comparisons were employed to analyze test results.

    Release date: 1995-12-15
Data (0)

Data (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Analysis (4)

Analysis (4) ((4 results))

  • 1. Respondent Relations in Longitudinal Surveys Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994002
    Description:

    This paper describes the experiences of other surveys in dealing with respondents. It also documents several viewpoints and survey findings on incentives and their effect on response rates as well as ways of maintaining interviewer morale.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 2. Measuring Non-response in a Longitudinal Survey: The Experience of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994016
    Description:

    This paper presents various data quality measures proposed for the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID), including wave and panel response rates and measures of the characteristics of non-respondents.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 3. Measurement Issues in the Reporting of Unemployment Insurance Archived
    Articles and reports: 75F0002M1994017
    Description:

    This study compares the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) respondents reporting of their receipt of unemployment insurance benefits in a 1993 field test with the benchmark of what was reported on their income tax form.

    Release date: 1995-12-30
  • 4. How prenotice letters, stamped return envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionnaires Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X199500214394
    Description:

    In a 1992 National Test Census the mailing sequence of a prenotice letter, census form, reminder postcard, and replacement census form resulted in an overall mailback response of 63.4 percent. The response was substantially higher than the 49.2 percent response rate obtained in the 1986 National Content Test Census, which also utilized a replacement form mailing. Much of this difference appeared to be the result of the prenotice - census form - reminder sequence, but the extent to which each main effect and interactions contributed to overall response was not known. This paper reports results from the 1992 Census Implementation Test, a test of the individual and combined effectiveness of a prenotice letter, a stamped return envelope and a reminder postcard, on response rates. This was a national sample of households (n = 50,000) conducted in the fall of 1992. A factorial design was used to test all eight possible combinations of the main effects and interactions. Logistic regression and multiple comparisons were employed to analyze test results.

    Release date: 1995-12-15
Reference (0)

Reference (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Report a problem or mistake on this page
Date modified:

Search help

How do I use the filters and the search box?

  • You can initiate a search by entering keywords or selecting filters (e.g., under Subject, Geography, etc.) on the left side of the page.

  • Filters can be used together or in any combination. Each time you select a filter, the results on the page are updated.

  • To start a new search, click on the Clear all button above the search box or deselect each filter.

  • Specified keywords and filters appear above the search box. You can deselect any or all the tags to refine or clear your search.

How do I refine my search?

  • You can enter keywords in the search box. It is not necessary to use “+” or “, “ or “AND”.

  • You can delete some or all of the keywords from your search string.

  • Quotes around keywords limit the search to a specific phrase.

    • For example, “labour force survey” will limit results to products containing this phrase.

  • Use “or” between keywords to obtain results that contain one or more search terms.

    • For example, labour or­ force or survey will limit results to products containing any or all of these words.

How does the search work?

  • This search looks for results that have your query term in the title, description, subject, geography, product number or other information about the product.

    • For example, when searching the term ‘Diseases’, all results with the word ‘Diseases’ in the title, description or tagged the subject appear.

  • The text within an article or publication are not searched. For full text searching of articles, use the site search.

Sort help

How are the results ordered?

The Sort by feature provides three options:

  • By date – sorts results by product release date starting with the most recent.
  • By relevance is only needed or beneficial when you use the search box and submit a search query. Results are ordered by a combination of where the search term appears in the content, e.g., if it appears in the title, it likely means the product is more relevant to your search; how up to date or new the content in the product is; how popular the product is; and other factors.
  • By title – sorts results alphabetically.

Sort help

How are the results ordered?

The Sort by feature provides four options:

  • By date – sorts results by product release date starting with the most recent.
  • By most popular – gives priority to results that are most frequently selected by users, followed by the most recent.
  • By relevance is only needed or beneficial when you use the search box and submit a search query. Results are ordered by a combination of where the search term appears in the content, e.g., if it appears in the title, it likely means the product is more relevant to your search; how up to date or new the content in the product is; how popular the product is; and other factors.
  • By title – sorts results alphabetically.