Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| War/Depression | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Wave 1 Boomers | 0.99 |
1.09 |
| Wave 2 Boomers | 0.92* |
0.95 |
| Generation X | 0.84* |
0.88* |
| Generation Y | 0.57* |
0.58* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Two-parent intact family | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Step-parent | 1.30* |
1.57* |
| Lone-parent | 1.16* |
1.22* |
| Other | 1.13 |
1.69* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Only child | 0.93 |
1.01 |
| One sibling | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Two siblings | 1.06 |
1.07 |
| Three siblings | 1.20* |
1.13* |
| Four siblings or more | 1.26* |
1.22* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Mother worked | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Did not work | 0.88* |
0.92* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Father worked | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Did not work | 1.34 |
1.32 |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Mother born in Canada | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Born outside Canada | 0.69* |
0.77* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Sometimes | 1.06 |
1.11* |
| Never | 1.22* |
1.27* |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic | 1.10* |
1.18* |
| Quebec | 1 |
1 |
| Ontario | 1.15* |
1.10* |
| Prairies | 1.54* |
1.64* |
| British Columbia | 1.42* |
1.50* |
| Outside Canada | 1.09 |
1.06 |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 5,000 | 1.44* |
1.80* |
| 5,000 to 24,999 | 1.36* |
1.60* |
| 25,000 to 99,999 | 1.27* |
1.39* |
| 100,000 to 999,999 | 1.10* |
1.17* |
| 1,000,000 or more | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Less than secondary | 0.92 |
1.12* |
| Had secondary diploma | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Postsecondary degree, certificate or diploma | 1.12* |
0.94 |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||
| Respondent characteristics | Risk Ratios Men | Risk Ratios Women |
|---|---|---|
| Did not work | 1.00 |
1.00 |
| Did work | 1.13* |
1.03 |
| * Statistically significant from benchmark group shown in italics, at the 95% confidence level Note: Risk ratios were generated with a proportional hazard model. Risk ratios over 1.0 indicate a higher risk associated with that characteristic, compared to the reference group; a risk ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower risk. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2001. | ||