| Halifax |
Québec City |
Montréal |
Ottawa/Gatineau |
Toronto |
Hamilton |
Winnipeg |
Regina |
Saskatoon |
Calgary |
Edmonton |
Vancouver |
| percentage point difference |
... |
9* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
9* |
ns |
ns |
9* |
... |
8* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
10* |
ns |
8* |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
8* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
6* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
8* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
7* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
9* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
ns |
9* |
ns |
8* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
10* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
... |
ns |
ns |
10* |
ns |
ns |
6* |
8* |
7* |
9* |
ns |
10* |
ns |
... |
| * Difference between CMAs is statistically significant at p<0.01 |
| ns No statistically significant difference |
| 1. Census Metropolitan Area |
| Note on interpreting this matrix table: Choose the row containing one of the CMAs you wish to compare, and follow it until you reach the column for the other CMA. |
| The cell shows the percentage point difference between rates of social incivility in the two CMAs. If the difference is not statistically significant, the cell shows "ns (blank). |
| For example, there is an 8 percentage point difference between Montréal and Québec City (24% and 16%, as shown in Table 2) and an 8 percentage point difference between Montreal and Calgary (24% and 16%). However, the difference between Montréal and any other CMAs in the study is not statistically significant. |
| Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2004 |
