Statistics Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Notes

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Current Economic Analysis Division (613-951-9162).
Eric Lascelles of TD Securities in “The mystery of fluxuating jobs data” in The National Post, December 6, 2008.
David Parkinson, ‘’Why are labour surveys so unpredictable?’’, Globe and Mail, B15, December 20, 2008.
The same conclusion holds for the monthly percent change of the logarithm of real GDP; it is nearly identical before and after 2002.
Lascelles found that a 6-month moving average worked better for the LFS employment data than a 3-month moving average.
A similar conclusion on the relative volatility of quarterly and year-over-year changes in GDP was found in “Revisions to the Quarterly Labour Productivity Estimates” by John Baldwin and Nataliya Rylska, Canadian Productivity Review, Catalogue no. 15-206-X1E, no 12, p. 41.
Data from the survey of employment, payrolls, and hours show a decline from 0.29 between 1994 and 2002 to 0.20 thereafter.