Statistics Canada - Government of Canada
Accessibility: General informationSkip all menus and go to content.Home - Statistics Canada logo Skip main menu and go to secondary menu. Français 1 of 5 Contact Us 2 of 5 Help 3 of 5 Search the website 4 of 5 Canada Site 5 of 5
Skip secondary menu and go to the module menu. The Daily 1 of 7
Census 2 of 7
Canadian Statistics 3 of 7 Community Profiles 4 of 7 Our Products and Services 5 of 7 Home 6 of 7
Other Links 7 of 7
Skip module menu and go to content.menu index Update on Analytical Studies Research Online catalogue Low income and inequality Earnings, income and wealth Employment, unemployment and working time Education and training Immigration Labour turnover Workplace studies Demographic groups Institutional factors Spatial analyses Trends and conditions in CMAs Data development Other More information Analytical studies branch research paper series

The persistent gap: New evidence on the Canadian gender wage gap

by Marie Drolet
Business and Labour Market Analysis Division
Analytical Studies Branch research paper series, No. 157

This article investigates the extent to which factors not previously explored in the Canadian context account for wage differences between men and women using data from the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID).

Like other studies using standard decomposition techniques and controlling for a variety of productivity-related characteristics, the results demonstrate that men still enjoy a wage advantage over women: women's average hourly wage rate is about 84% to 89% of the men's average. Unlike other studies, controls for work experience and job-related responsibilities are used. Gender differences in full-year full-time work experience explain at most 12% of the gender wage gap. Gender differences in the opportunity to supervise and to perform certain tasks account for about 5% of the gender wage gap. Yet, despite the long list of productivity related factors, a substantial portion of the gender wage gap cannot be explained.

Many studies rely on measures such as age or potential experience (i.e. age minus number of years of schooling minus six) as a proxy for actual labour market. Neither of these measures account for complete withdrawals from the labour market nor for restrictions on the number of hours worked per week or on the number of weeks worked per year due to family-related responsibilities. The results show that proxies for experience yield larger adjusted gender wage gaps than when actual experience is used.

View the full publication


You need to use the free Adobe Reader to view PDF documents. To view (open) these files, simply click on the link. To download (save) them, right-click on the link. Note that if you are using Internet Explorer or AOL, PDF documents sometimes do not open properly. See Troubleshooting PDFs. PDF documents may not be accessible by some devices. For more information, visit the Adobe website or contact us for assistance.


Home | Search | Contact Us | Français Top of page
Date modified: 2007-09-20 Important Notices