Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Beneficial management practices for manure management, Canada and provinces, 2001
  Fully implemented Partially implemented Not available in my region Not relevant for my farm Unfamiliar with beneficial management practices
Share of farms with livestock (%)
Newfoundland and Labrador
36.8
X
0.0
X
26.3
Prince Edward Island
26.6
X
X
X
34.0
Nova Scotia
9.2
X
X
17.4
61.3
New Brunswick
14.4
10.9
2.4
32.6
39.7
Quebec
47.6
17.8
0.6
29.0
4.9
Ontario
14.2
15.0
1.3
32.2
37.3
Manitoba
20.7
10.2
1.8
30.8
36.5
Saskatchewan
6.6
4.2
3.4
30.5
55.3
Alberta
12.5
9.0
0.8
27.8
49.9
British Columbia
24.8
8.9
3.2
43.6
19.6
Canada
17.8
10.7
1.7
30.5
39.2
Notes:
1. Where no error letter appears beside a number, the standard error ranges between 0.005% and 12.49%. Results are considered excellent to acceptable.
2. Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Farm Environmental Management Survey.


Beneficial management practices for manure management, Canada and provinces, 2001
  Fully implemented Partially implemented Not available in my region Not relevant for my farm Unfamiliar with beneficial management practices
Share of manure produced on farms with livestock (%)
Newfoundland and Labrador
F
X
0.0
X
16.8
Prince Edward Island
36.0
33.0
X
X
27.8
Nova Scotia
X
X
X
1.0
61.1
New Brunswick
24.8
24.7
9.7
7.5
33.2
Quebec
70.5
22.0
0.4
3.8
3.3
Ontario
27.3
25.1
1.5
3.9
42.2
Manitoba
37.7
17.1
2.0
4.3
38.9
Saskatchewan
16.8
8.4
6.4
8.7
59.6
Alberta
25.0
12.5
0.7
10.1
51.7
British Columbia
45.2
11.3
3.4
19.4
20.6
Canada
32.6
15.9
2.1
7.7
41.7
Notes:
1. Where no error letter appears beside a number, the standard error ranges between 0.005% and 12.49%. Results are considered excellent to acceptable.
2. Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals.
Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Farm Environmental Management Survey.