The estimates presented in this publication cover farm and off-farm income
of farm families operating a single unincorporated farm with total operating
revenues of $10,000 and over. The estimates are derived from income
tax returns produced by taxfiling members of farm families.
2008 Overview
In 2008, the average total income of Canadian farm families was $100,031,
up 6.8% from 2007, according to data from personal income tax returns.
After adjustment for capital cost allowance (CCA), their average total income
rose 6.5% to $85,156.
The growth in farm families’ average total income in 2008 reflects
increases in both average total income from off-farm sources and average net
farm operating income. Off-farm income accounted for 78.5% of their total
income, down 1.8 percentage points from 2007. It was the first
time since 2001 that the proportion of off-farm income was down,
and as a result, the proportion of farm-derived income rose.
Average off-farm income totalled $78,475 in 2008, up 4.3%
from 2007, reflecting growth in most of its major components. Other off-farm
income (+17.7%) posted the largest gain relative to 2007, followed by
investment income (+7.2%), pension income (+5.0%) and income from off-farm
employment (+3.3%). Only government social transfers shrank (-1.0%). Average
net farm operating income rose 16.6%, as average net market income continued
to recover in 2008.
It is important to note that not all farm family income earned from a farming
operation is net farm operating income. Income reported as wages and salaries
and as investment income may have come from the farm.
Average net market income jumped 66.2% to $14,532 in 2008,
comparable to the levels observed before the bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE) crisis. As in 2007, the main factor behind the increase was the
rise in average revenues from grain and oilseed sales. Higher revenues from
net cash advances, custom work and machine rental, poultry and egg sales,
and forage crop sales also contributed to the advance in average net market
income. However, the growth in average net market income was moderated by
lower average hog revenues and higher average operating expenses. Average
operating expenses rose in the wake of higher crop expenses (namely fertilizer
and lime, and pesticides), net fuel expenses for machinery, truck and auto,
feed, supplement, straw and bedding expenses, and general expenses.
Average net program payments to farm families dropped 27.9% to $7,023 in 2008.
This decline was partly attributable to an improvement in oilseed and grain
prices.
Income of farm families by farm type
The average total income of families specializing in oilseed and grain
farming grew 11.8% to $114,855 in 2008. This gain was
the result of a 5.2% increase in average off-farm income and a 32.6%
increase in average net farm operating income, which rose for the third consecutive
year. As was the case in 2007, average net farm operating income climbed,
as the gain in average net market income largely offset the decline in average
net program payments. Driven by higher average revenues from all major grains
and oilseeds, particularly canola, wheat, barley and grain corn, average net
market income of these families more than doubled, rising from $13,713 in 2007 to $28,784 in 2008.
Higher oilseed and grain prices and a good harvest helped these families to
cope with rising input costs.
Revenues from grains and oilseeds benefited from higher prices. On average,
grain and oilseed prices remained well above the 2007 levels, as
strong demand and tight world supplies continued to drive prices upward in
the first part of 2008. Subsequently, prices retreated from their summer
peaks, as global stocks were partially replenished by increased production.
While grain and oilseed producers and their families continued to benefit
from strong grain and oilseed prices, many livestock producers and their families,
notably those in the beef cattle and hog sectors, continued to face serious
challenges arising from high input costs and reduced livestock prices due
largely to the strong Canadian dollar vis-à-vis its American counterpart
in the first part of 2008. Furthermore, they faced market access challenges
such as the mandatory Country-of-Origin Labelling (COOL) regulations 1 in the United States, which created uncertainties in the livestock exports.
The average total income of families primarily engaged in beef cattle
farming rose 3.4% to $86,452 in 2008, reflecting gains
in both average net farm operating income and average off-farm income. Struggled
with a strong dollar and increasing feed costs, these families experienced
a net market income loss for the sixth consecutive year, but the loss continued
to shrink and went from $4,459 on average in 2007 to $2,969 in 2008.
Combined with a 1.6% increase in average net program payments, the improvement
in average net market income contributed to push average net farm operating
income of these families up 29.8% from 2007 to $7,211.
Average off-farm income of these families rose 1.5%.
Combined with average operating expenses that remained virtually unchanged,
higher average revenues from grains and oilseeds, forage crops, and custom
work and machine rental, supported the improvement in these families’
average net market income. Average operating expenses remained relatively
stable, as decreases in cattle purchases and custom work and machine rental
expenses outpaced increases in feed and net fuel expenses.
After rebounding slightly in 2007, the average total income of
families running a hog and pig farm edged down 3.1% to $75,772 in 2008,
as the 8.6% rise in average off-farm income could not compensate for
the 22.7% decline in average net farm operating income. Largely hit by
increased production costs, in particular feed grain costs, and market uncertainty,
these families saw their average net market income drop from an average loss
of $11,581 in 2007 to a loss of $37,688 in 2008.
Other factors in the rise of average operating expenses were crop expenses,
net interest expenses, miscellaneous expenses, net fuel expenses, marketing
expenses and hog purchases. Average revenues from hog sales registered by
families specialized in hog production increased 6.4% but this trend
does not reflect the trend observed for total revenues from hog sales, which
went down 14.4%. 2
Revenues from live hog exports went down as both prices and marketings
fell from 2007 levels, while revenues from domestic slaughter hogs
increased due to higher marketings. Strong hog production in the U.S. and
a high Canadian dollar contributed to maintain low hog prices in 2008.
Hog prices have been struggling to improve from lows reached in late 2007,
when producers faced rising feed grain costs, a higher Canadian dollar and
abundant North American hog supplies.
Rising input costs, due partly to higher feed grain prices and market
uncertainty, and soft slaughter prices continued to squeeze profit margins
of families in the hog sector in 2008. The cost-price squeeze faced by
these families along with the implementation of U.S. COOL legislation and
the uncertainty over market conditions have led to farm restructuring and
barn and farm closures. Provinces that relied on exports to the US or that
lost slaughter capacity were most affected. 3 With
low or even negative profit margins, producers are leaving the industry. In 2008,
many hog producers also took advantage of the federal Cull Breeding Swine
Program 4 to reduce the
size of their breeding herd. At January 1, 2009, Canadian hog producers
had reported their inventories at 12.2 million, down 11.8%
from the previous year. 5
Average net program payments to families in the hog sector were up 47.6%
from 2007 to $60,347.
Families running a poultry and egg farm and those running a dairy farm
posted an increase in average total income of 7.6% (to $119,004)
and 5.8% (to $111,855), respectively. In both cases, advances in
average net farm operating income and average off-farm income contributed
to the gain. As in 2007, average net farm operating income advanced,
as prices in supply-managed commodities increased to help cover mounting production
costs.
As in the case of families operating a hog and pig farm, average total
income declined for families engaged in other vegetable (except potato) and
melon farming (-5.1%), potato farming (-2.9%), and greenhouse, nursery and
floriculture production (-0.9%) in 2008. Families specializing in other
vegetable and melon farming saw decreases in both average net farm operating
income and average off-farm income. The decline in the average total income
was due to lower average net farm operating income for families specializing
in potato farming and to lower average off-farm income for families specializing
in greenhouse, nursery and floriculture production.
Income of farm families by farm typology group
Families operating a business-focused farm (i.e., a small, medium-size,
large or very large farm) averaged $126,097 in total income, up 7.1%,
while farm families on a pension, lifestyle or low-income farm earned $82,217 on
average, up 5.5%.
Farm families in all farm typology groups saw their average total income
increase in 2008, with families operating a medium-size farm enjoying
the biggest gain. Their average total income grew 10.7% to $119,415 in 2008.
Increases in both average net market income (+40.0%) and average off-farm
income (+12.2%) compensated for the 39.6% drop in average net program
payments.
Families operating a pension farm or a small farm had advances in average
total income of 6.0% and 5.9%, respectively. In both cases, increases
in average net market income and average off-farm income offset the decline
in average net program payments.
After posting increases in average total income that exceeded the national
average in 2007, families operating a large or a very large farm experienced
more modest gains in average total income in 2008. For families operating
a large farm, average total income rose 2.3% to $125,372, as a 31.0%
jump in average net market income overrode declines in average off-farm income
(-0.5%) and average net program payments (-46.2%). Families operating a very
large farm were in a similar situation, as their average total income edged
up just 0.7%, as a 28.7% increase in average net market income offset
decreases in average off-farm income (-13.7%) and average net program payments
(-18.4%).
Families operating a very large farm decreased their dependence upon
off-farm income by 5.7 percentage points from 2007. The proportion
of average total income derived from off-farm sources fell from 39.7%
in 2007 to 34.0% in 2008.
The second largest decrease in off-farm income share was posted by families
operating a small-size farm. Off-farm income accounted for 90.7% of their
total income in 2008, a decrease of 1.6 percentage points from 2007.
The share of income as a percentage of total income also went down for families
operating a large farm (-1.3 percentage points to 46.9%) and for
families operating a pension farm (-0.5 percentage points to 87.7%).
The share increased for all other farm typology groups.
Income of farm families by province
In 2008, the average total income of farm families was up in every
province, except in British Columbia (-4.8%) and in New Brunswick (-0.6%).
The only provinces whose growth rates for average total income were above
the national average were Saskatchewan (+11.9%) and Newfoundland and Labrador
(+9.3%).
Saskatchewan’s 11.9% growth in average total income between 2007 and 2008 topped
Alberta’s and Manitoba’s gains of respectively 6.0% and 5.7%.
High grain and oilseed prices helped families in the Prairies to cope with
rising input costs. Average net market income more than doubled (+105.7%)
in Saskatchewan. It increased 94.9% in Manitoba and 84.2% in Alberta.
Higher average off-farm income, especially in Saskatchewan, also contributed
to the rises in average total income.
As a result of that growth, Saskatchewan’s farm families moved
up to third place in average total income. Ontario’s farm families remained
second, as their average total income climbed 6.2% to $99,262. Alberta’s
farm families continued to head the list with an average total income of $122,845.
For a second consecutive year, they were, on average, the only farm families
whose average total income surpassed the national average.