Measuring housing affordability
- In 2004, about 1 in 7 (1.7 million) households saw 30% or more of their spending go for shelter. Renters were much more likely than owners to fall into this category—31% compared with 6%.
- Renters spending 30% or more on shelter were more likely to be individuals living alone, and those spending 50% or more were more likely to be reliant on government transfers (81%).
- Spending on rent varied considerably across the country. For the most part, the larger the city, the higher the costs. In the largest cities, just under a third of renters spent 30% or more on shelter, compared with just 19% in rural areas. Even after taking into account income levels and other household characteristics, Toronto and Calgary renters had four times the odds of spending 30% or more on shelter than renters in rural areas.
- Regardless of whether the household consisted of an individual living alone, a lone-parent family, or a senior family, being in low income was a highly significant factor in shelter-cost burden. Renters with household income up to $19,190 a year had 18 times the odds of being cost-burdened compared with those in the top half of the income distribution.
Full article: HTML | PDF
Jacqueline Luffman is with the Labour and Household Surveys Analysis Division. She can be reached at 613-951-1563 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You need to use the free Adobe Reader to view PDF documents. To view (open) these files, simply click on the link. To download (save) them, right-click on the link. Note that if you are using Internet Explorer or AOL, PDF documents sometimes do not open properly. See Troubleshooting PDFs. PDF documents may not be accessible by some devices. For more information, visit the Adobe website or contact us for assistance.