Statistics Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Income replacement during the retirement years

By Sébastien LaRochelle-Côté, Garnett Picot and John Myles

Full article: HTML | PDF

In 2006, the family income of a typical individual in his late seventies was about 80% of that same person’s family income in his mid-fifties, or 23 years earlier.

Individuals who were in the bottom quintile of family income typically achieved higher replacement rates as most had replacement rates above 1.0 (or 100%) in their mid-seventies.

Since they had a higher income to replace, most individuals in the top income quintile had lower replacement rates, in the 0.7 range. Still, one-third of them had replacement rates above 0.8 in their mid-seventies.

Individuals in the middle quintile typically had replacement rates closer to 0.8, but a sizeable minority—about 22%—had replacement rates below 0.6.

The sources of pension income differed largely across income groups as well. For those who were in the bottom quintile in their mid-fifties, public pensions (Canada Pension Plan, Quebec Pension Plan, Old Age Security, Guaranteed Income Supplement) accounted for two-thirds of total family income on average. Individuals in the top quintile relied a lot more on private sources of income.

Among middle-income Canadians, private and public sources of pension income each contributed 45% and 32% of total family income before taxes, respectively.