Table 6
Absence rates for full-time employees by province, region and census metropolitan area (CMA), 2011Note 1
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
| IncidenceNote 2 | Inactivity rateNote 3 | Days lost per worker in yearNote 4 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Illness or disability | Personal or family responsibilities | Total | Illness or disability | Personal or family responsibilities | Total | Illness or disability | Personal or family responsibilities | |
| % | % | days | |||||||
| Province and region | |||||||||
| Both sexes | 8.1 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 9.3 | 7.7 | 1.6 |
| Atlantic | 8.7 | 6.3 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 10.6 | 8.9 | 1.7 |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 7.6 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 10.2 | 8.5 | 1.8 |
| Prince Edward Island | 8.4 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 8.3 | 1.5 |
| Nova Scotia | 9.1 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 10.8 | 9.0 | 1.8 |
| New Brunswick | 8.9 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 10.8 | 9.2 | 1.7 |
| Quebec | 8.8 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 10.8 | 9.3 | 1.5 |
| Ontario | 7.7 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 1.7 |
| Prairies | 8.0 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 8.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 |
| Manitoba | 9.1 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 10.2 | 8.2 | 1.9 |
| Saskatchewan | 9.5 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 11.0 | 8.8 | 2.2 |
| Alberta | 7.3 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 1.6 |
| British Columbia | 7.7 | 5.9 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 8.3 | 1.6 |
| All CMAs | 8.0 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 7.3 | 1.6 |
| St. John's | 8.6 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 10.4 | 8.4 | 2.0 |
| Halifax | 9.2 | 6.6 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 10.2 | 8.3 | 1.9 |
| Saint John | 8.0 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 9.9 | 7.9 | 2.0 |
| Moncton | 9.0 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 10.1 | 9.0 | 1.1 |
| Saguenay | 7.4 | 5.2 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 3.5 | 3.0 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 8.7 | 7.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Québec | 8.4 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 9.6 | 8.1 | 1.4 |
| Montréal | 9.1 | 6.7 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 10.8 | 9.3 | 1.5 |
| Trois-Rivières | 7.7 | 5.7 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 3.7 | 3.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 9.4 | 8.2 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Sherbrooke | 8.2 | 6.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 3.9 | 3.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 9.9 | 8.8 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Gatineau | 11.2 | 8.2 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 11.7 | 9.6 | 2.1 |
| Ottawa | 10.0 | 6.8 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 9.3 | 7.2 | 2.1 |
| Kingston | 8.5 | 6.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 3.8 | 3.1 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 9.6 | 7.8 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Barrie | 8.7 | 6.4 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 7.2 | 1.4 |
| Brantford | 8.2 | 6.0 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 4.0 | 3.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 10.1 | 8.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Greater Sudbury/Grand Sudbury | 8.6 | 6.1 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 4.1 | 3.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 10.3 | 8.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Peterborough | 7.8 | 5.9 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 3.4 | 2.9 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 8.4 | 7.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Guelph | 7.1 | 4.7 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 2.7 | 2.0 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 6.8 | 4.9 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Toronto | 6.9 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 7.1 | 5.7 | 1.5 |
| Hamilton | 7.6 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 1.8 |
| St. Catharines–Niagara | 8.0 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 9.0 | 7.3 | 1.7 |
| London | 7.7 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 6.5 | 1.7 |
| Windsor | 8.2 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 1.6 |
| Kitchener–Waterloo | 7.9 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 6.4 | 1.8 |
| Oshawa | 7.8 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 8.2 | 6.6 | 1.6 |
| Thunder Bay | 9.0 | 6.6 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 4.2 | 3.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 10.5 | 8.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Winnipeg | 9.2 | 6.7 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 8.3 | 1.7 |
| Regina | 9.7 | 6.6 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 |
| Saskatoon | 8.9 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 9.7 | 8.2 | 1.4 |
| Calgary | 7.0 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Edmonton | 7.7 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 8.1 | 6.6 | 1.5 |
| Abbotsford | 8.0 | 6.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 4.0 | 3.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 10.1 | 8.8 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Vancouver | 7.3 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 1.5 |
| Victoria | 9.1 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 11.1 | 9.2 | 1.8 |
| Non-CMAs | 8.4 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 10.7 | 8.9 | 1.9 |
| Population centres | 8.2 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 8.3 | 1.7 |
|
1. Excluding maternity leave. However, men on paid paternity (in Quebec only) or parental leave are included in the calculation until 2006. 2. Absent workers divided by total. 3. Hours absent divided by hours usually worked. 4. Inactivity rate multiplied by working days in year (250). Source: Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey. |
|||||||||
- Date modified: