Table 11
Low-income dominance, test statistics are computed for relative low-income lines between 15% to 70% provincial median income
Low |
Model w/ relative low income lines |
Base-model rankings |
B.C. |
Ont. |
Alta. |
Sask. |
Que. |
Man. |
N.L. |
N.S. |
N.B. |
P.E.I. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
B.C. |
B.C. |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Ont. |
Que. |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Alta. |
Man. |
|
|
|
Z |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Sask. |
Sask. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
Que. |
Alta. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
Man. |
Ont. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
N.L. |
N.L. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z |
1 |
1 |
7 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
9 |
N.B. |
N.B. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
P.E.I. |
P.E.I. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: B.C. = British Columbia; Man. = Manitoba; Sask. = Saskatchewan; Alta. = Alberta; Ont. = Ontario; P.E.I. = Prince Edward Island; Que.= Quebec; N.B. = New Brunswick; N.S. = Nova Scotia; N.L. = Newfoundland and Labrador. 1 in the cell indicates that the column first-order dominates the row at 5% level; similar interpretation for 2 (second-order) and 3 (third-order) dominance. The first (second) parenthesis indicates the lower-bound (upper-bound) of stochastic dominance, at 5% significance level, at given order condition. The lower (upper) bound thresholds are censored at 15% and 70% of the provincial median income respectively. Z indicates that dominance relation can not be found up to third-order condition. Test of dominance is evaluated at every x value in the sample between 15% and 70% of the provincial median income, where x is equivalent income based on the low-income cutoff equivalence scale and cost-of-living deflator. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics, 2000. |
||||||||||||