Table A.3.1.3
Percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income,Note 1 by type of living arrangement, Canada and provinces, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 to 2010

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Table A.3.1.3
Percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income, by type of living arrangement, Canada and provinces, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 to 2010
Table summary
This table displays the results of percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income ages 20 to 24, all living arrangements, living with two parents, living with lone parent and not living with any parent, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Ages 20 to 24
All living arrangements Living with two parents Living with lone parent Not living with any parent
percent
Canada  
1990 17 3 7 30
1995 23 6 16 41
2000 19 5 7 36
2005 19 4 9 37
2006 17 4 5Note  r: revised 34
2007 15 2 10 31
2008 16 3 11Note  r: revised 32Note  r: revised
2009 16 4 14 31
2010 15 3 12 32
Newfoundland and Labrador  
1990 16 2 23 30
1995 23 10 Note F: too unreliable to be published 47
2000 19 5 Note F: too unreliable to be published 44
2005 20 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 42
2006 21Note  r: revised Note F: too unreliable to be published Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 47Note  r: revised
2007 15Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 35Note  r: revised
2008 15Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 34Note  r: revised
2009 11Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 31Note  r: revised
2010 8 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 17
Prince Edward Island  
1990 10 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 18
1995 12 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 24
2000 18 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 32
2005 9 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 16
2006 12Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 24Note  r: revised
2007 10Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 23Note  r: revised
2008 9 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 23Note  r: revised
2009 4Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 10Note  r: revised
2010 10 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 25
Nova Scotia  
1990 14 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 25
1995 22 5 14 38
2000 16 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 29
2005 19 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 32
2006 17Note  r: revised 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 32Note  r: revised
2007 16Note  r: revised Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 29Note  r: revised
2008 19Note  r: revised Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 34Note  r: revised
2009 22 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 41Note  r: revised
2010 18 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 34
New Brunswick  
1990 13 1 18 22
1995 17 1 Note F: too unreliable to be published 31
2000 13 1 Note F: too unreliable to be published 28
2005 12 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 24
2006 14Note  r: revised 2 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 27Note  r: revised
2007 14Note  r: revised 0 Note F: too unreliable to be published 30Note  r: revised
2008 19Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 38Note  r: revised
2009 18Note  r: revised Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 34Note  r: revised
2010 11 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 21
Quebec  
1990 20 6 8 34
1995 29 6 24 51
2000 18 3 6 39
2005 22 3 9 42
2006 18 3 7Note  r: revised 36
2007 16Note  r: revised 2 8Note  r: revised 35Note  r: revised
2008 17Note  r: revised 2 12Note  r: revised 36Note  r: revised
2009 16Note  r: revised 1 6 38Note  r: revised
2010 13 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 30
Ontario  
1990 13 1 4 26
1995 17 4 15 35
2000 15 4 2 36
2005 15 2 12 35
2006 16Note  r: revised 3 5 38Note  r: revised
2007 14Note  r: revised 3 13 32
2008 16 3 14 38
2009 17 6 15Note  r: revised 39Note  r: revised
2010 14 4 9 38
Manitoba  
1990 20 1 19 32
1995 28 6 Note F: too unreliable to be published 51
2000 19 5 Note F: too unreliable to be published 35
2005 22 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 47
2006 15 7 Note F: too unreliable to be published 28Note  r: revised
2007 14Note  r: revised 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 24Note  r: revised
2008 11 1 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 24
2009 14Note  r: revised 1 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 31Note  r: revised
2010 18 1 Note F: too unreliable to be published 37
Saskatchewan  
1990 20 5 21 29
1995 19 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 28
2000 20 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 32
2005 22 1 Note F: too unreliable to be published 35
2006 18Note  r: revised 3 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 29Note  r: revised
2007 15 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 26Note  r: revised
2008 13 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 21Note  r: revised
2009 8 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 13Note  r: revised
2010 9 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published 17
Alberta  
1990 21 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 32
1995 32 5 36 46
2000 20 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 32
2005 20 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 32
2006 15 1 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 25
2007 13 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 22Note  r: revised
2008 10 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 15
2009 12 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 20
2010 14 2 Note F: too unreliable to be published 22
British Columbia  
1990 23 6 Note F: too unreliable to be published 36
1995 24 13 Note F: too unreliable to be published 36
2000 28 15 26 41
2005 23 10 Note F: too unreliable to be published 43
2006 22 7Note  r: revised Note F: too unreliable to be published 38
2007 19Note  r: revised 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 38Note  r: revised
2008 20 7 Note F: too unreliable to be published 34Note  r: revised
2009 18Note  r: revised 8 38Note  r: revised 22Note  r: revised
2010 21 7 25 38
.. not available for a specific reference period
r revised
F too unreliable to be published
0 true zero or a value rounded to zero
1. Based on after-tax low-income cutoffs (LICOs), which indicate when a family may be in "straitened circumstances." This means that the family is likely to spend 20% more of its net income on basic items such as food, shelter and clothing compared with the average family, which leaves less money available for other expenses such as health, education, transportation and recreation.
Note: For a brief description of this indicator, including the methodology, please see the Handbook for the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program.
Sources: Statistics Canada, Survey of Consumer Finances, 1990 and 1995, and Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics, 2000, 2005 to 2010.
Updated December 13, 2012.
Date modified: