Statistics Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Skip to content | Skip to institutional links

Common menu bar links

Home > Publications > 82-003-X > Main page > Variations by health region in treatment and survival after heart attack >

Site navigation menu

Page content follows

References

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.










  1. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of care. Annals of Internal Medine 2003; 138: 273-87.

  2. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Annals of Internal Medine 2003; 138: 288-98.

  3. Parente ST, Phelps CE, O’Connor PJ. Economic analysis of medical practice variation between 1991 and 2000: the impact of patient outcomes research teams (PORTs). International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008; 24(3): 282-93.

  4. Freund D, Lave J, Clancy C, et al. Patient outcomes research teams: contribution to outcomes and effectiveness research. Annual Reviews of Public Health 1999; 20: 337-59.

  5. Hasselblad V, Mosteller F, Littenberg B, et al. A survey of current problems in meta-analysis. Discussion from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Working Group on Literature Review/Meta-analysis. Medical Care 1995; 33(2): 202-20.

  6. Maklan CW, Greene R, Cummings MA. Methodological challenges and innovations in patient outcomes research. Medical Care 1994; 32(7 Suppl.): JS13-21.

  7. Pilote L, Merrett P, Karp I, et al. Cardiac procedures after an acute myocardial infarction across nine Canadian provinces. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2004; 20(5): 491-500.

  8. Johansen H, Nair C, Mao L, Wolfson M. Revascularization and heart attack outcomes. Health Reports (Statistics Canada, Catalogue 82-003) 2002; 13(2): 35-46.

  9. Slaughter PM, Young W, DeBoer DP, et al. Patterns of revascularization. In: Naylor CD, Slaughter PM, eds. Cardiovascular Health and Services in Ontario: An ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 1999: 165-87.

  10. Hartford K, Ross LL, Walld R. Regional variation in angiography, coronary artery bypass surgery, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in Manitoba, 1987 to 1992: the funnel effect. Medical  Care 1998; 36(7): 1022-32.

  11. World Health Organization. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Death. Based on the recommendations of the Ninth Revision Conference, 1975. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1977.

  12. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.

  13. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Care in Canada 2001.  Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2001.

  14. Canadian Institute for Health Information. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, ICD-10-CA/CCI. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2003.

  15. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochi-nasinell: Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Long-term effects of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: final report of the GISSI study. Lancet 1987; 2(8564): 871-4.

  16. Wilkes NP, Jones MP, O.Rourke MF, et al. Determinants of recurrent ischaemia and revascularisation procedures after thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in primary coronary occlusion. International Journal  of Cardiology 1991; 30(1): 69-76.

  17. Mant J, Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: The sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. British  Medical Journal 1995; 311: 793-6.

  18. Rouleau JL, Moye LA, Pfeffer MA, et al. A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. The New England Journal of  Medicine 1993; 328: 779-84.

  19. Mark DB, Naylor CD, Hlatky MA, et al. Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 130-5.

  20. Tu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD, et al. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. The New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 336(21): 1500-5.

  21. Langer A, Fisher M, Califf RM, et al. Higher rates of coronary angiography and revascularization following myocardial infarction may be associated with greater survival in the United States than in Canada. The CARS Investigators. Canadian Journal of  Cardiology 1999; 15(10): 1095-102.

  22. Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, et al. 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet 2006; 368: 998-1004.

  23. Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, et al. A long-term perspective on the protective effects of an early invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease. Journal of the AmericanCollege of Cardiology 2002, 40: 1902-14.

  24. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003, 361: 13-20.

  25. Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. New England Journal of Medicine 2001, 344: 1879-87.

  26. Cox DA, Stone GW, Grines CL, et al. Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC Trial). American Journal of Cardiology 2006, 98: 331-337.

Date Modified: 2015-07-17

Top of Page
Important Notices