Health Reports
Population health impact of statin treatment in Canada

by Deirdre A. Hennessy, Peter Tanuseputro, Meltem Tuna, Carol Bennett, Richard Perez, Margot Shields, Dennis T. Ko, Jack Tu and Douglas G. Manuel

Release date: January 20, 2016 Correction date: (if required)

Statins—drugs used to lower cholesterol—have been shown to improve survival and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among individuals across the spectrum of CVD risk.Note 1Note 2Note 3 As a result, statins are one of the most frequently prescribed classes of drugs in Canada, and constitute the leading drug cost in all provincial drug programs,Note 4Note 5Note 6 with direct drug costs totalling almost $2 billion annually.Note 6 The prescribing of statins has not been without controversy. New guidelines on CVD risk assessment and statin treatment from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association and from the National Institute for Clinical Evaluation in the United Kingdom have brought the issue into the headlines.Note 7Note 8Note 9Note 10Note 11

Owing to the frequency of statin use and the considerable resources allocated to treatment, an examination of the population health impact is warranted. It is important to understand who takes statins; how these individuals are distributed along the spectrum of CVD risk; whether the medication is not taken when it is recommended and vice versa; and how effective the medication is in preventing disease events.

In contrast to the myriad data available from meta-analyses and clinical trials to support  inclusion of statin drugs in provincial formularies, little evidence is available to inform the population health perspective. The Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) offers the first opportunity in more than 25 years to examine the population health impact of statin medications. In addition to evaluating medication use, the CHMS data allow for an assessment of treatment guidelines and adherence to targets such as the Canadian Heart Health Strategy.Note 12Note 13Note 14

This study uses the latest CHMS data to describe the CVD risk profile of Canadian adults and investigate the population health impact (CVD events prevented) of statins. To reveal treatment gaps and potentially inform health policy related to CVD risk reduction, current treatment patterns reported in the combined cycles of the CHMS are compared with the 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society’s (CCS) lipid guidelines.


Data source

From 2007 through 2011, the CHMS, a population-based survey, collected physical measures (including blood samples, blood pressure, weight and height) from 11,999 respondents aged 3 to 79. Details about the survey have been described in detail elsewhere.Note 15Note 16Note 17Note 18

Briefly, the CHMS has a household and a clinic component. Data were collected at 15 sites across Canada in cycle 1 and at 18 sites in cycle 2. Estimates using the combined file reflect the average Canadian household popula­tion during the study timeframe (2007 to 2011). The CHMS is representative of 96% of the Canadian household population aged 3 to 79. It excludes residents of Indian Reserves, Crown lands, institutions and certain remote regions, and full-time members of the Canadian Forces. The response rates, calculated as the product of response fractions for the household (69.6%), the household questionnaire (88.3%), and the mobile examination centre component (84.9%), with an adjustment for the sampling strategy, were 51.7% for cycle 1 (2007 to 2009) and  55.5% for cycle 2 (2009 to 2011). During an in-home interview, respondents completed a questionnaire covering socio-demographic characteristics, medical history, current health status, prevalent conditions, and health-related behaviours. Ethics approval for the CHMS was obtained from Health Canada’s Research Ethics Board. Written consent was requested from respondents before participation.

Study sample

Of the total number of respondents (n = 11,999) in the combined CHMS cycles, a subsample (n = 5,427) provided fasting blood samples. This enabled a full lipid profile, which was necessary to calculate CVD risk. Of this subsample, adult respondents (20 or older and not pregnant) were selected for the present analysis (n = 3,512). Special survey weights calculated for the fasting sample were applied to represent the Canadian population.Note 19


The baseline CVD risk of Canadians aged 20 to 79 was examined by sociodemographic and CVD risk factor variables. Information about medication use was collected during the in-home interview, and also during a subsequent appointment at a mobile examination centre (MEC).

Drug identification numbers (DINs) were taken from medication containers during the home interview and verified during the MEC appointment, which typically occurred within two weeks of the home interview. The CHMS recorded up to 15 medications for each respondent. Statin use was defined as any statin medication taken in the past month. Medications reported in current use by respondents were assigned codes from the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System.Note 20 Statin-users were identified with two ATC codes—C10A and C10B. These codes also identified users of non-statin lipid-lowering medications like fenofibrate. Respondents who reported only non-statin medications were classified as non-users. The small number of respondents who were using statin combination drugs were classified as statin-users.

The CVD risk of Canadian adults was examined by sex, age group (20 to 39, 40 to 59, and 60 to 79) and cardiovascular risk factors. The cardiovascular risk factors included: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level in mmol/L (less than 2; 2 to less than 3.5; 3.5 to 5; and more than 5); total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio in mmol/L (less than 5; 5 or more); smoking (respondents who reported smoking daily or occasionally were categorized as smokers); diabetes status (respondents were categorized as having diabetes if their measured blood glucose was greater than or equal to 7 mmol/l and/or had an audited use of glucose-lowering medication [ATC codes A10] and/or a self-reported health-care-provider diagnosis of diabetes); and mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) in mmHg, measured with the BpTRU™ BP-300 device at the MEC.Note 21Note 22Note 23 The use of blood pressure medications was also considered:  beta blockers (ATC codes C07, excluding C07AA07, C07AA12 and C07AG02); agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (ATC codes C09); thiazide diuretics (ATC codes C03, excluding C03BA08 and C03CA01); calcium channel antagonists (ATC codes C08); and miscellaneous antihypertensives (ATC codes C02, excluding C02KX01). Finally, family history of premature (younger than 60 in a first-degree relative) heart disease and stroke were investigated as cardiovascular risk factors.

For risk-stratification, high-risk individuals were defined as having high-risk hypertension; that is, they had three or more of the following risk factors: male, older than 55, smoker, total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio greater than 6, or a family history of premature CVD and chronic kidney disease.Note 24


CVD risk profile of Canadians

Figure 1 illustrates the steps used to stratify the population aged 20 to 79 according to CVD risk (steps 1 to 4) and calculate the number of CVD events potentially avoided (steps 5 and 6). First, high-risk individuals were identified based on self-reported and measured diagnosis of heart disease, diabetes (aged 40 or older, 30 or older with at least 15 years’ duration of diabetes or with microvascular disease),Note 25 chronic kidney disease, and high-risk hypertension. For respondents reporting pre-existing heart disease, stroke or acute myocardial infarction, baseline CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for recurrent coronary heart disease.Note 26 For respondents who did not automatically fall into the high-risk category, baseline CVD risk was calculated using the FRS for total CVD events over 10 years, as recommended in the 2012 CCS guidelines.Note 25 Total CVD events predicted included coronary death, myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, angina, cerebrovascular events (including ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and transient ischemic attack), peripheral artery disease (intermittent claudication), and heart failure over 10 years.Note 27 The risk factors included in the algorithm were age, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, SBP, treatment for high blood pressure, smoking, and diabetes. Risks were calculated separately for men and women.

To improve risk stratification, the CCS guidelines recommend doubling the calculated baseline CVD risk for people with a family history of CVD. This inflates the estimate of population baseline risk and results in poorly calibrated population risk estimates.Note 28 To avoid this bias, baseline risk among those with a family history of CVD was not doubled; instead, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to show how many more people would be recommended for treatment based on a positive family history of CVD (Appendix  A).

For those already taking statins, the calculated FRS was based on adjusted levels of cholesterol. Cholesterol levels were adjusted back to pre-treatment levels with a meta-analysis that provided estimates of statin effectiveness by type and dose (Appendix B).Note 29  Failure to make this adjustment would have underestimated baseline CVD risk. All estimates of CVD risk, the number needed to treat (NNT), and CVD events avoided were based on pre-treatment cholesterol levels.

Current and guideline-recommended treatment

Once individuals were stratified by baseline CVD risk, the percentage currently taking statins and being treated at target was estimated (Figure 1, step 5). The CCS guidelines were applied to estimate the numbers who would be screened and treated if the guidelines were fully implemented. Screening criteria recommended by the guidelines that were measured in the CHMS were applied to the population. Men older than 40 and women older than 50 (or postmenopausal women of any age) were considered for screening. In addition, respondents (regardless of age) who had diabetes, hypertension, family history of premature CVD, chronic kidney disease, HIV infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity (BMI greater than 27) or were current cigarette smokers would be screened.

According to the CCS guidelines, individuals screened were considered for treatment based on their risk stratum. Low-risk individuals were considered for treatment, along with lifestyle modification, if their LDL cholesterol was at least 5.0 mmol/L. Intermediate-risk individuals were considered for treatment if their LDL-cholesterol was at least 3.5 mmol/L or their non-HDL cholesterol was at least 4.3 mmol/L. All high-risk individuals were considered for treatment. “Successful” treatment was defined as meeting the targets of LDL cholesterol of no more than 2.0 mmol/L or non-HDL cholesterol of no more than 2.6 mmol/L for individuals in intermediate- or high-risk groups, and a 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol for the low-risk group.

Population health impact

To assess the population health impact of statins, the total number of CVD events potentially avoided was calculated for two groups: 1) people currently treated with statins identified in the CHMS (Figure 1, step 5), and 2) people  who would be recommended for statin treatment according to the CCS guidelines (Figure  1, step 6). The absolute risk reduction was calculated by multiplying the mean 10-year baseline risk in the risk group (treated or recommended for treatment) by a relative risk reduction of 25%, obtained from the latest meta-analysis of clinical trials of statin treatment.Note 1 The inverse of the absolute risk reduction, multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest whole number, is the number-needed-to-treat (NNT—the average number who need to be treated to prevent one additional CVD event). The total number of CVD events avoided was calculated by dividing the number treated by the NNT for those currently treated and performing the same calculation for those recommended for treatment according to the CCS guidelines.Note 13 Confidence intervals were obtained for the number of CVD events avoided by completing the same calculations on the 95% variance estimates of the number treated and recommended for treatment by risk group.

All analyses were weighted using the CHMS combined cycle survey weights for the fasting subsample. The weighted sample represented the community-dwelling population aged 20 to 79.Note 19 To account for survey design effects, variance estimates were calculated using the bootstrap technique with 24 degrees of freedom, as appropriate for the CHMS. Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.1 and Stata 11.


CVD risk profile of Canadians

For the population aged 20 to 79, the 10-year risk of a CVD event was 8.9% or approximately 2.1 million events over 10 years (about 210,000 each year) (Table 1). Around 20% of adults were classified as high-risk, 9% as intermediate-risk, and 71% as low-risk. The mean 10-year risk of a CVD event was 28% for high-risk, 14% for intermediate-risk, and 3% for low-risk adults.

Current statin treatment

Almost 2.8 million Canadians aged 20 to 79 (12%) reported being treated with statin drugs during the period from 2007 to 2011 (Table 2). The mean 10-year CVD risk of those treated was 27%, which translates into an NNT of 15 over 10 years, or about 18,900 total CVD events avoided annually (188,700 in 10 years), assuming full adherence to statin therapy (Table 2). Approximately 2.1 million high-risk individuals with an average 10-year risk of 32% were treated with statins; this potentially avoided 17,000 CVD events annually (90% of all CVD events avoided). An estimated 323,600 intermediate-risk individuals with an average 10-year risk of 15% were treated with statins, potentially avoiding almost 2,000 CVD events annually. Around 360,000 low-risk individuals, whose average 10-year risk was 7%, were treated, potentially avoiding 600 CVD events annually. Of those treated, 1.1 million (40%) had achieved recommended target lipid levels (data not shown).

Guideline-recommended lipid screening and statin treatment

About 19 million 20- to 79-year-olds (79%) met the CCS recommendations for lipid testing and risk assessment (data not shown). Of those eligible for lipid testing, 6.5 million (27% of the total population) would be recommended for statin treatment (Table 2). The mean 10-year CVD risk of those  recommended for treatment was 24%, which translates into an NNT of 17 over 10 years, or 38,600 CVD events avoided annually, assuming full adherence to statin therapy (Table 2).

Figure 2 compares current treatment levels with those recommended by the CCS guidelines, by risk group. Figure 3 compares total CVD events avoided, by risk group, for current treatment levels versus total CVD events avoided under the CCS guidelines. In the high-risk group, 2.6 million more people would be treated with statins if the guidelines were fully implemented, potentially avoiding 16,000 more CVD events each year. Among intermediate-risk individuals, treatment would be recommended for 1.1 million more, potentially avoiding 3,900 more CVD events annually. In the low-risk group, the numbers currently treated and recommended for treatment were similar (Table 2, Figure 2).


Using data from the largest population-based survey of physical measures since the 1992 Canadian Heart Health Survey,Note 30 this study reports the distribution of CVD risk and the current and potential health impact of statin treatment in Canada. The results reveal a gap between current and guideline-recommended treatment. About 1 in 10 people aged 20 to 79 were treated with statins—substantially fewer than the approximately 1 in 4 who, according to CCS guidelines, would be recommended for treatment. Specifically, these results show a gap in statin treatment among high- and intermediate-risk Canadians.

Most (90%) of the current population benefit of statins is attributable to high-risk individuals. Treatment of this group has more than twice the efficacy (measured by NNT) of treating the intermediate-risk group, and four times the efficacy of treating the low-risk group. The current study shows that, according to the CCS guidelines, almost 20% of 20- to 79-years would be classified as high-risk, 9% as intermediate-risk, and 71% as low-risk of a CVD event.

The treatment gap for people at high and intermediate risk is consistent with previous studies. Evidence for both Canada and the United Kingdom suggests underuse of statins among the highest-risk individuals.Note 31Note 32 On the other hand, Van Staa et al.Note 32 reported overuse among low-risk individuals.

The moderate increase in the level of treatment of Canadians with dyslipidemia since the Canadian Heart Health Survey of the early 1990sNote 33 contrasts with dramatic improvements in the treatment and control of hypertension, largely owing to coordinated physician education efforts and public awareness.Note 34  The analyses in this study suggest a potential for gains in population health by targeting statin treatment toward high- and intermediate-risk groups.Note 32

However, raising statin coverage to guideline-recommended levels has cost implications. Doubling the numbers treated would double the $1.6 billion direct costs.Note 6 Recommendations to increase statin eligibility in the U.S. and U.K. have triggered considerable controversy.Note 7Note 8Note 9Note 10Note 11  Under both sets of recommendations, the numbers eligible would rise substantially.Note 11Note 35 Concern has been expressed about the cost to individuals and the health care system of broader statin coverage, as well as about the medicalization of people who would be newly treated.Note 10Note 11 Critics in the U.K. have contended that increasing statin coverage would divert resources from primordial prevention.Note 36

Compared with earlier versions, the 2012 guidelines classify more Canadians as high-risk (20%). Based on the 2009 guidelines, 13.7% of Canadians aged 20 to 79 would be high-risk,Note 33 an increase over the estimate based on the 2006 guidelines.Note 37 While the increase from the 2006 to the 2009 versions likely resulted from updating the algorithm used to calculate baseline CVD risk,Note 37 the 2012 version broadened the definition of high-risk individuals.Note 25 It is difficult to determine whether the increase in CVD baseline risk reflects a true increase in CVD risk in the population, or whether the increase could be attributable to a poorly calibrated FRS or other measurement misclassification. The FRS may overestimate baseline risk,Note 38Note 39 a possibility supported by observed rates of Canadian CVD hospitalization and death below the rate estimated in this study using the Framingham Risk Score.Note 40Note 41 The trend toward classifying more people as “high-risk” may be appropriate for subpopulations such as those with renal disease, whose risk was updated in the CCS guidelines based on high-quality evidence,Note 25 but likely overestimates CVD risk in Canada overall. Validation and calibration of CVD risk-assessment tools specifically for the Canadian population are clearly warranted.


The results of this study should be considered in the context of a number of limitations. The CHMS data describe statin use in the 2007-to-2011 period, which predates the 2012 CCS guidelines. As well, although combined survey cycles were used, some estimates were un-reportable due to small sample sizes. Because the CHMS was designed to produce national estimates, it was not possible to examine CVD risk and statin use by province or among at-risk ethnic groups like South Asians.Note 19

The overall response rate to the CHMS was 53.5%; applying the survey weights ensured that the sample was representative of the target population, but bias might exist if non-respondents differed systematically from respondents.Note 19

Some of the variables in this analysis were self-reported; therefore, the prevalence of characteristics such as family history of CVD was likely underestimated.

Another limitation is that the study reflects treatment within a month of survey administration; respondents who started or discontinued treatment shortly after sampling are not included. In addition, the CHMS captured a maximum of 15 prescription medications; therefore, in extreme cases of polypharmacy, statin use may be underestimated.

A small number of respondents used other cholesterol-lowering drugs like fenofibrate; this study did not examine the population health effects of such drugs. The analysis was based on the assumption that everyone for whom statins were recommended took them as prescribed. In addition, it was assumed that statins yield a constant absolute risk reduction of 25% over the entire population,1 which may be an overestimate, as the percentage is based on data collected from clinical trials, not “real-world” observational studies.

Because the CHMS excludes people aged 80 or older and residents of institutions, estimates of CVD risk and statin use are lower than they would have been had these populations been included.


This analysis provides a population health perspective on current and guideline-recommended statin use in Canada. A treatment gap appears to have emerged for people at intermediate and high risk of CVD, which, if fully addressed, could avert an estimated 19,500 CVD events each year. While some of the gap may reflect patient intolerance and/or reluctance to accept treatment, the size of the gap (more than 50% in the high-risk group) is considerable. On the other hand, the results show that the CVD risk among Canadians has increased under the current CCS guidelines; validation and calibration of the FRS for use in Canada are needed to assess the degree to which CVD risk is overestimated. Increased statin coverage requires accurately measuring risks and weighing the costs, opportunity-costs, and benefits of statin therapy.

Date modified: