Health Reports
Nutritional risk, hospitalization and mortality among community-dwelling Canadians aged 65 or older

by Pamela L. Ramage-Morin, Heather Gilmour and Michelle Rotermann

Release date: September 20, 2017

Advancing age may bring diet-related challenges. Among seniors, chronic conditions and the medications used to treat them can interfere with appetite,Note 1 the taste and enjoyment of food,Note 2 and the absorption of nutrients.Note 3Note 4 Impaired mobility and dexterity, declining health, and lack of transportation can be barriers to purchasing and preparing food.Note 5 Poor oral health may also hinder eating.Note 6 Some older people live in “food deserts” devoid of supermarkets and characterized by convenience stores and fast-food outlets with “empty calorie” choices.Note 7Note 8 Changes in living arrangements due to the loss of a spouse can affect seniors’ diets through loneliness and the logistics of cooking for one.

A paradox of aging is that caloric needs decrease, but the need for a nutritious diet does not.Note 9 It is important to identify the people most likely to be at risk of nutritional depletion, who, without intervention, may become malnourished, frail, and susceptible to negative health outcomes including functional limitations, poor quality of life, longer hospital stays and readmissions, and earlier death.Note 10Note 11Note 12Note 13Note 14Note 15Note 16Note 17

Nutritional risk increases at older ages.Note 18 Thus, with Canada’s aging population, the prevalence of nutritional risk and the associated adverse health outcomes could become more common. Previous studies have investigated associations between nutritional risk and hospitalizationNote 19Note 20Note 21 and mortality,Note 10Note 16Note 19Note 22Note 23Note 24Note 25Note 26Note 27Note 28Note 29 but the analyses were limited by small samples, lack of representativeness, or restricted subpopulations.

Recent linkages of Canadian population health surveys to hospital data and to mortality records offer an opportunity to study a more complete range of risk factors in association with acute care hospitalization and death than do administrative data sources alone. This analysis examines hospitalization and death in relation to nutritional risk status using a large, population-based sample of community-dwelling seniors aged 65 or older from the 2008/2009 Canadian Community Health Survey–Health Aging (CCHS–HA). Prospective hospitalization and death were monitored through linkage to the Discharge Abstract Database and the Canadian Mortality Database up to December 31, 2011 (a follow-up period of 25 to 36 months after the CCHS–HA interview). Multivariate analyses controlled for socioeconomic, physical health, and lifestyle characteristics.


Canadian Community Health Survey—Healthy Aging (CCHS-HA)

The cross-sectional 2008/2009 CCHS–HA collected information about factors, influences, and processes that contribute to healthy aging. The target population was people aged 45 or older living in private dwellings in the 10 provinces. The survey excluded residents of the three territories, First Nations reserves, certain remote regions, institutions, and Canadian Forces bases, and full-time members of the Canadian Forces. Together, these exclusions represented about 4% of the target population.

CCHS–HA data were collected from December 2008 through November 2009. Computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted for 94% of the sample; telephone interviews were permitted to accommodate the language needs of respondents. If, because of physical or mental ill health, respondents were unable to complete the survey, another knowledgeable person was allowed to respond on their behalf. Those proxy respondents comprised 2.2% of the sample (n = 689). The overall response rate was 74.4%, for a final sample of 30,865 respondents. Detailed documentation for the CCHS–HA is available elsewhere.Note 30

Discharge Abstract Database (DAD)

The DAD is a census of hospital discharges from public hospitals in Canada (excluding Quebec), provided annually to Statistics Canada by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.Note 31 The DAD contains demographic, administrative, and clinical data for about 3 million hospital discharges each year.Note 32 Acute care hospital discharge records for fiscal years 2007/2008 through 2011/2012 were used for the linkage on which this analysis was based.

Canadian Mortality Database (CMDB)

The CMDB is a census of all deaths registered in Canada. The provincial and territorial Vital Statistics Registries report deaths to Statistics Canada, providing information on cause coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD–version 10), dates of birth and death, names, and postal code at the time of death. Deaths occurring from December 2008 through December 31, 2011 were linked to the CCHS–HA records.

Study sample

The study sample was established by linking records for CCHS–HA respondents aged 65 or older from the provinces (except Quebec) who agreed to share and link their data with records from the DAD and the CMDB (Appendix Figure A). Proxy respondents and non-respondents to the nutritional risk questions were excluded. To establish a relatively healthy cohort at baseline, 801 respondents who had been hospitalized in an acute care facility and discharged in the year before the CCHS–HA were excluded, resulting in a study sample of 9,878 (4,080 men and 5,798 women; average age 77).

Data linkage

Probabilistic linkages were performed in accordance with the Directive on Record LinkageNote 33 and approved by Statistics Canada’s Executive Management Committee.Note 34

Statistics Canada ensures respondent privacy during the linkage and subsequent use of linked files. Only employees directly involved in the process have access to the unique identifying information required for linkage (such as names and health insurance numbers); they do not access health and/or death- related information. When a linkage is completed, an analytical file is created from which identifying information is removed. This de-identified file is accessed by researchers for analysis. Details about the linkages are available elsewhere.Note 35Note 36

Internal and external validations were conducted on both the CCHS–DAD and CCHS-CMDB files to evaluate the accuracy of the linkage process. Evaluations confirmed that the linked files are suitable for analysis.Note 35Note 36


Nutritional risk was evaluated in the 2008/2009 CCHS–HA using Seniors in the Community Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition II–Abbreviated (SCREEN II–AB), which has been validated for “cognitively intact community-living seniors” aged 55 or older.Note 12Note 37 Nutritional risk questions pertain to weight change (gains and losses), nutrition intake, and dietary habits (Appendix Figure B). The SCREEN questions were modified to accommodate the change from self-administered to computer-assisted personal interviews. Values corresponding to the response categories for the 11 component variables were summed for a maximum score of 48; a score below 38 indicates nutritional risk.Note 12

Demographic and socioeconomic variables were age, sex and main source of household income. Among the older, often retired, population, current income may not be a reliable indicator of socioeconomic status. To identify people of limited means, respondents were asked about their main source of income: wages and salaries; income from self-employment; dividends and interest (for example, from bonds or savings); Employment Insurance; Worker's Compensation; Canada or Québec Pension Plan benefits; retirement pension, superannuation and annuities; Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement; Child Tax Benefit; provincial or municipal social assistance or welfare; child support; alimony; other (rental income or scholarships, for example); or none. Respondents who cited Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement or provincial/municipal social assistance or welfare were grouped and compared with those relying on other income sources.

Respondents’ self-perceived health was classified as good, very good or excellent versus fair or poor. Self-perceived health was chosen as a covariate because of its reliability and validity, and because it is strongly correlated with various aspects of health status including functional ability, chronic diseases, and psychological well-being.Note 38

Current daily smokers were compared with all others (occasional smokers, former smokers, and those who never smoked).

Body mass index (BMI = weight in kilograms/height in metres squared) categories were: underweight (less than 18.5), normal/overweight (18.5 to less than 30.0), and obese (30.0 or more). A correction was applied to BMI to reduce bias from self-reported weight and height.Note 39

Acute care facilities were identified with the DAD variable: analytical_inst_type_code = 1. Respondents with at least one admission between the date of their CCHS–HA interview and December 31, 2011 were considered to have had an acute care hospitalization.

Deaths and dates of death were taken from the CMDB. Only CMDB deaths occurring on or before December 31, 2011 were included in the CCHS-CMDB source files.

Analytical techniques

Cross-tabulations were used to estimate the percentage of the population at nutritional risk by sex and age group, and the percentage with at least one acute care hospitalization or who died in the prospective period, by nutritional risk status and other selected characteristics. Data were examined graphically to check for interactions between nutritional risk and hospitalization or death by sex and age group (none were identified; data not shown). Parsimonious multivariate models were used to examine associations between nutritional risk (the exposure variable) and acute care hospitalization or mortality (Cox proportional hazards). Models controlled for sex, age, main source of household income, and health-related characteristics (self-perceived health, smoking status, and BMI). Selection of covariates was based on the literature and availability in the CCHS–HA. Although living alone may be a risk factor for hospitalization and/or death among seniors, it was not included as a covariate in this analysis because the nutritional risk assessment contains a question about the frequency of eating meals alone, which is highly correlated with living alone (Spearman’s rho 0.78).

For both the hospitalization and mortality analyses, the study sample was followed from the date of the CCHS–HA interview to December 31, 2011. The length of the follow-up period, therefore, ranged from 25 to 36 months and was determined by when the respondent was interviewed.

The proportional hazards assumption was tested by visual examination of SAS PROC LIFETEST plots for both outcomes. Analyses were performed on weighted data adjusted for agreement to link and share, using SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1.

Sampling weights were used to account for the survey design and non-response, and to adjust for differences in agreement to link and share. The use of sampling weights is essential to account for unequal probabilities of selection and to reduce the potential for bias resulting from differing response, share, and agreement to link rates. Bootstrap weights were applied using SAS-Callable SUDAAN 11.0 to account for underestimation of standard errors due to the complex survey design.Note 40 The significance level was set at p < 0.05.


Close to a million

Almost a million (an estimated 979,000) Canadians aged 65 or older were at nutritional risk in 2008/2009. They made up a third (34%) of people in this age range (Table 1). Women were more likely than men to be at nutritional risk (37% versus 29%), as were those aged 75 or older compared with younger seniors (36% versus 32%). The average age of those at nutritional risk was 75 versus 74 for those not at risk (p ≤ 0.05; data not shown in table).


More than a quarter (26%) of seniors were hospitalized at least once during the follow-up period. Older seniors were more likely than those aged 65 to 75 to have been hospitalized: 35% compared with 19% (Table 2). Daily smokers and people who were underweight were more likely to have been hospitalized, while the opposite was true for people who rated their health as good, very good or excellent. Among seniors at nutritional risk in 2008/2009, 31% had an acute care hospitalization during the follow-up period, significantly higher than the 24% of those not at nutritional risk who were hospitalized.

Even when age, sex, major source of household income, health status, and health behaviours were taken into account, those at nutritional risk had significantly increased risk (1.2) of acute care hospitalization (Table 3).


An estimated 7% of the senior population died during the follow-up period (Table 2). Being male, older age, daily smoking, and underweight were associated with an increased risk of death; good, very good or excellent perceived health was protective. Those at nutritional risk in 2008/2009 were more likely than those not at risk to die, with respective estimates of 9% and 5%. When the confounding effects of socio-demographic characteristics, health status, and health behaviours were considered, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was significantly higher (1.6) for seniors at nutritional risk (Table 3). As well, those at nutritional risk had a shorter average survival time during the follow-up period than did those not at nutritional risk: 498 days (95% CI: 462 to 534) versus 538 days (95% CI: 501 to 574) (data not shown in table).


For the first time, acute care hospitalization and death in Canada (excluding Quebec and the territories) have been prospectively estimated in relation to nutritional risk status using linked population-based survey and administrative data. About a third of seniors living in the community were at nutritional risk in 2008/2009.

A diet of inadequate quality or quantity can contribute to over- or underweight, decreased bone mass, immune dysfunction, cognitive impairment, functional limitations, anemia, and a lowered ability to rebound from illness or surgery.Note 41Note 42 This study reinforces the association between nutritional risk and compromised health. Although the prevalence of nutritional risk differed by sex and age group, multivariate analyses confirmed associations with hospitalization and death; that is, regardless of sex, age and other potentially confounding factors, those at nutritional risk in 2008/2009 were significantly more likely to have been hospitalized or to have died during the 25- to 36-month follow-up period, compared with those not at nutritional risk. It is likely an iterative process whereby an inadequate diet can lead to chronic conditions, while existing conditions and associated treatments may impair nutritional well-being.Note 9Note 18Note 43

Results of the relatively few studies that have examined nutritional risk and hospitalization among community-dwelling seniors are mixed: two studies found a significant association,Note 19Note 20 but another did not.Note 21 However, hospitalization is only one component of a health care system. Analyses of a broader range of services did not find significant associations between nutritional risk and physician visits or nursing home admissions, but relationships with home care and length of hospitalization did emerge.Note 19Note 20Note 21Note 23 It is possible that associations between nutritional risk and hospitalization depend on the cause/reason for hospitalization and/or whether the hospitalization was planned (for example, for surgery) or unplanned (for example, due to a worsening health condition).

The association between nutritional risk and mortality in the present analysis is consistent with several,Note 10Note 16Note 21Note 22Note 23Note 24Note 25 but not all,Note 21Note 26Note 44 previous studies. Differences in nutritional screening tools, follow-up periods, age ranges, covariates, sample sizes, representativeness, and geographic locations make comparisons with other research difficult. Two studiesNote 10Note 16 that used a version of the SCREEN nutritional risk tool similar to that employed in this analysis also found significant associations with mortality. A recent systematic reviewNote 13 concluded that nutritional screening tools were most predictive of mortality in acute or higher-level care settings, but less so for community-dwelling older people. Nonetheless, the present study shows that the SCREEN II–AB instrument captures associations between nutritional risk and hospitalization and mortality among community-dwelling seniors, which contribute to the predictive validity of this screening tool.

Future research could examine specific causes of hospitalization or death, and identify subgroups of older adults (for instance, immigrants, socially isolated seniors) among whom nutritional risk is most strongly associated with hospitalization and mortality. In addition, hospitalized individuals could be stratified by whether they were surgical or medical patients and/or whether the hospital days accumulated were because the patient was receiving active treatment, or whether some/all days were considered alternate level of care (ALC). ALC patients no longer require acute care, but may remain in acute care beds while waiting for placement in a long-term care facility.Note 45


Results of this study are based on seniors living in the community and do not reflect nutritional risk or associations with hospitalization and death among residents of long-term care facilities. Proxy respondents did not complete the nutritional risk survey questions, and therefore, were excluded from the analysis. While this has the potential to introduce bias, so would inclusion of survey records completed on behalf of infirm individuals.Note 46 An analysis of selected characteristics of the study population indicates that proxy respondents were more likely to be men, older, and in worse health than self-reporting respondents.Note 47 However, proxy respondents comprised just 2.2% of the sample.

CCHS–HA data are self-reported and not verified by any other source. The nutritional status of individuals was not measured in the CCHS–HA, and the SCREEN II–AB instrument does not distinguish between respondents at risk of becoming nutritionally depleted and those who are already undernourished. Additionally, nutritional risk was measured only once—at the time of the CCHS–HA interview―so it is not known if nutritional risk status changed during the follow-up period or how long it lasted. Some variables of potential relevance (for instance, medication use and history) were not available.

CCHS–HA respondents from Quebec could not be included in the study, because the DAD does not contain data for that province. As well, if respondents who lived in other provinces were hospitalized in Quebec, their hospital stays were not captured in the DAD or in this study.

Only acute care hospitalizations were examined; findings are not generalizable to other types of hospitalization such as day surgery and psychiatric services, or to health service use generally. In addition, after 2005, mental health hospitalizations in Ontario tended to be reported to a different administrative database: the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System.Note 48 Therefore, acute care mental health hospitalizations are underrepresented in the linked data.

Probabilistic linkage was used to match survey records to hospitalization and death information; the possibility of false links or missed links exists.


This analysis illustrates the value of linking administrative hospital and death data to large, nationally representative population health surveys. The results indicate that nutritional risk is independently associated with acute care hospitalization and mortality, and highlight the importance of monitoring and treating seniors for nutritional risk in primary care settings in an effort to reduce hospitalizations and improve survival. Understanding the impact of nutritional risk on seniors’ health can inform programs aimed at reducing morbidity, and aid in planning for future needs for health care resources.


Statistics Canada thanks all participants for their input and advice during the development of the 2008/2009 CCHS–HA. The survey content was developed by the Health Statistics Division at Statistics Canada in consultation with Health Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, and experts conducting the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), a major initiative of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Consultations included stakeholders from Human Resources and Social Development Canada and provincial and territorial health ministries. The addition of 5,000 respondents aged 45 to 54 was funded by the CLSA.

Statistics Canada gratefully acknowledges Dr. Heather Keller for permission to use SCREEN II-AB and for her help in adapting the instrument for use in the CCHS–HA.

Date modified: