Table 9
Changes, by category, in self-rated health since 1994/1995, Canada and provinces


                                                        Self-rated health changes from 1994/1995 to 2004/2005 
  Number  %
Health improvement  
Canada 588,956 2.7
Newfoundland and Labrador 9,183 E 2.1 E
Prince Edward Island 3,382 E 3.5 E
Nova Scotia 32,977 E 4.8 E
New Brunswick 12,039 E 2.2 E
Quebec 145,158 E 2.7 E
Ontario 213,930 2.7
Manitoba F F
Saskatchewan 22,165 E 3.2 E
Alberta 57,980 E 2.9 E
British Columbia 69,410 E 2.5 E
Health deterioration  
Canada 1,195,883 5.6
Newfoundland and Labrador 19,735 E 4.6 E
Prince Edward Island 3,852 E 4.0 E
Nova Scotia 48,791 E 7.1 E
New Brunswick 33,303 E 6.0 E
Quebec 304,204 5.6
Ontario 459,982 5.7
Manitoba 36,302 E 4.8 E
Saskatchewan 39,688 E 5.8 E
Alberta 109,740 5.5
British Columbia 140,286 E 5.1 E
Same self-rated health  
Canada 16,208,829 75.6
Newfoundland and Labrador 341,548 79.0
Prince Edward Island 76,057 79.1
Nova Scotia 503,288 73.7
New Brunswick 398,319 71.6
Quebec 4,270,564 79.1
Ontario 5,992,987 74.3
Manitoba 583,663 76.6
Saskatchewan 500,568 72.7
Alberta 1,507,564 75.1
British Columbia 2,034,271 74.4
Health improvements and deteriorations  
Canada 3,434,044 16.0
Newfoundland and Labrador 61,887 14.3
Prince Edward Island 12,878 13.4
Nova Scotia 97,461 14.3
New Brunswick 112,950 20.3
Quebec 681,673 12.6
Ontario 1,400,322 17.4
Manitoba 119,379 15.7
Saskatchewan 126,260 18.3
Alberta 331,167 16.5
British Columbia 490,067 17.9

1. The table shows the changes in self-rated health of the 1994/1995 household population aged 12 and over every 2 years from cycle 1 to cycle 6 of the National Population Health Survey. Population, age, sex, Canada and province are based on the first survey cycle (cycle 1) in 1994/1995.
2. The table excludes persons who died or who were institutionalized after cycle 1 survey interview in 1994/1995. Estimated number of persons who have died: 287 persons after cycle 2, 599 persons after cycle 3, 957 persons after cycle 4, 1,279 persons after cycle 5 and 1,640 persons after cycle 6. These data are not all confirmed yet with the Canadian Vital Statistics Database. Persons living in an institution are excluded because they are not asked certain questions. Estimated number of persons who have been institutionalized: 62 persons at cycle 2, 114 persons at cycle 3, 135 persons at cycle 4, 161 persons at cycle 5 and 144 persons at cycle 6.
3. The table also excludes children under 12 and non-response (missing values), that is, "not applicable", "don't know", "refusal" and "not stated".
4. No estimates for self-rated health are provided for 1994/1995; what is shown instead are the changes in self-rated health. For estimates on self-rated health in 1994/1995, please refer to Health Indicators CANSIM table 104-0022, "Health status, Well-being".
5. Percentages are based on the population with a specific characteristic (one category) in a given cycle as the numerator divided by the total population in 1994/1995 having all possible characteristics (all categories) as the denominator, excluding missing values.
6. Bootstrapping techniques were used to produce the coefficient of variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
7. Data with a coefficient of variation (CV) from 16.6% to 33.3% are identified by an (E) and should be interpreted with caution.
8. Data with a coefficient of variation (CV) greater than 33.3% were suppressed (F) due to extreme sampling variability.
9. Changes in self-rated health of the 1994/1995 population during each consecutive survey cycle from 1994/1995 to 2004/2005 are based on the 2004/2005 longitudinal full cycle 1 to cycle 6 subset of respondents (from 2004/2005 longitudinal data file). This subset contains all panel members with a complete (full) response in cycle 1 (1994/1995), cycle 2 (1996/1997), cycle 3 (1998/1999), cycle 4 (2000/2001), cycle 5 (2002/2003) and cycle 6 (2004/2005). Number of respondents for this table (excluding missing values): 8,525.
Note(s): When comparing estimates, it is important to use confidence intervals to determine if differences between values are statistically significant. Confidence intervals describe sampling variability and give an indication of the precision of a given estimate. Please note that confidence intervals and coefficient of variations are provided in the CANSIM tables.
Source(s): Statistics Canada, National Population Health Survey, 2004/2005 longitudinal data file (CANSIM table 104-7018).