Table 3
Victimization incidents reported by Canadians, by census metropolitan area, 2014

Table 3
Victimization incidents reported by Canadians, by census metropolitan area, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Victimization incidents reported by Canadians. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan area (appearing as row headers), Total violent victimization, Total household victimization and Theft of personal property, calculated using number (thousands) and rate units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan area^Note 1^,^Note 2	Total violent victimization^Note 3		Total household victimization^Note 4		Theft of personal property
Census metropolitan area^Note 1^,^Note 2	number (thousands)	rate^Note 5	number (thousands)	rate^Note 6	number (thousands)	rate^Note 5
St. John's	12^{Note E: Use with caution}	73^{Note E: Use with caution}	10	121	16	97
Halifax	46	129^Note *	23	129	36	100^Note *
Saint John	8^{Note E: Use with caution}	72^{Note E: Use with caution}	5^{Note E: Use with caution}	103^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Québec	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	33	97^Note *	38^{Note E: Use with caution}	58^{Note E: Use with caution}
Sherbrooke	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	17^{Note E: Use with caution}	204^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Montréal	216	65	271	160	268	80
Gatineau^Note 7	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	22^{Note E: Use with caution}	168^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Ottawa–Gatineau	83^{Note E: Use with caution}	77^{Note E: Use with caution}	66	126	117^{Note E: Use with caution}	107^{Note E: Use with caution}
Ottawa^Note 8	52^{Note E: Use with caution}	63^{Note E: Use with caution}	44	112	82^{Note E: Use with caution}	100^{Note E: Use with caution}
Oshawa	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	34^{Note E: Use with caution}	265^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Toronto	423	83	268	118^Note *	308	61
Hamilton	69^{Note E: Use with caution}	108^{Note E: Use with caution}	44	149	58^{Note E: Use with caution}	90^{Note E: Use with caution}
St. Catharines–Niagara	31^{Note E: Use with caution}	80^{Note E: Use with caution}	24^{Note E: Use with caution}	128^{Note E: Use with caution}	46^{Note E: Use with caution}	117^{Note E: Use with caution}
Kitchener–Cambridge–Waterloo	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	21^{Note E: Use with caution}	106^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
London	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	32^{Note E: Use with caution}	164^{Note E: Use with caution}	34^{Note E: Use with caution}	86^{Note E: Use with caution}
Windsor	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	19^{Note E: Use with caution}	170^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Winnipeg	78^{Note E: Use with caution}	118^{Note E: Use with caution}^Note *	78	253^Note *	71	108^Note *
Regina	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	22	241^Note *	16	82^{Note E: Use with caution}
Saskatoon	35^{Note E: Use with caution}	142^{Note E: Use with caution}	23	201^Note *	35^{Note E: Use with caution}	143^{Note E: Use with caution}^Note *
Calgary	62^{Note E: Use with caution}	54^{Note E: Use with caution}^Note *	87	160	86^{Note E: Use with caution}	75^{Note E: Use with caution}
Edmonton	87^{Note E: Use with caution}	81^{Note E: Use with caution}	93	187^Note *	80	74
Kelowna	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	15^{Note E: Use with caution}	160^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Vancouver	140	65	191	191^Note *	156	73
Victoria	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	24^{Note E: Use with caution}	145^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
All CMAs	1,619	78	1,497	152^Note *	1,646	79^Note *
All CAs^Note 9	248	61^Note *	285	139	271	67
Non CMA/CA	378	81	247	108^Note *	237	51^Note *
Total^Note †	2,245	76	2,029	143	2,154	73
^E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Note † reference category Return to note † referrer Note * significantly different from reference category (p < 0.05) Return to note * referrer Note 1. A census metropolitan area (CMA) consists of one or more neighbouring municipalities situated around a major urban core. A CMA must have a total population of at least 100,000, of which 50,000 or more live in the urban core. To be included in the CMA, other adjacent municipalities must have a high degree of integration with the core as measured by the flow of daily migration calculated from census data. Return to note 1 referrer Note 2. The following CMAs are not included in the table because reliable estimates could not be established for them due to sample size: Moncton, Saguenay, Trois-Rivières, Kingston, Peterborough, Brantford, Guelph, Barrie, Greater Sudbury, Thunder Bay, Abbotsford–Mission. Return to note 2 referrer Note 3. Includes sexual assault, robbery and physical assault. Return to note 3 referrer Note 4. Includes break and enter, theft of motor vehicle or parts, theft of household property and vandalism. Return to note 4 referrer Note 5. Rates are calculated per 1,000 population aged 15 years and older. Return to note 5 referrer Note 6. Rates are calculated per 1,000 households. Return to note 6 referrer Note 7. Gatineau refers to the Quebec part of the Ottawa–Gatineau CMA. Return to note 7 referrer Note 8. Ottawa refers to the Ontario part of the Ottawa–Gatineau CMA. Return to note 8 referrer Note 9. A census agglomeration (CA) consists of one or more neighbouring municipalities situated around a central core. A CA must have a core population of at least 10,000. To be included in a CA, other adjacent municipalities must have a high degree of integration with the core as measured by the percentage of commuters established from previous census place of work data. Return to note 9 referrer Note: Corresponds to the victim’s CMA of residence; the incident may have occurred outside the victim’s CMA. Comparisons between CMAs should be interpreted with caution because not all differences in CMA estimates are statistically significant. Excludes data from the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut which will be published at a later date. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2014.

Date modified:: 2015-11-30

Language selection

Search and menus

Search

Table 3
Victimization incidents reported by Canadians, by census metropolitan area, 2014

Table 3 Victimization incidents reported by Canadians, by census metropolitan area, 2014

Table 3
Victimization incidents reported by Canadians, by census metropolitan area, 2014