Table 2
Reasons for reporting and not reporting fraud to police by industry, Canada, 2008

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]85-571-x[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]

Symbols

Reasons for reporting and not reporting fraud to police by industry, Canada, 2008
  Industry
Retail Banking Health and property insurance
  percent
Reasons why the police are contacted  
Seriousness: significant losses 61 92 76
To try to recover losses 58 65 23
Company policy 48 62 24
To pursue criminal charges 41 86 57 E
Sense of duty 34 25 28
Seriousness: suspicion of links to organized crime 20 86 44 E
Satisfactory experience with police response in the past 8 38 9
Other 1 6 21 F
Advised by someone to do so 4 F F
Reasons why the police are NOT contacted  
Incident too minor 56 84 34
Don't think police can do anything 26 66 20
Dealt with another way 19 26 33
Unsatisfactory experience with police response in the past 19 31 29 E
Losses recovered through other means 18 60 10
Unsatisfactory experience with criminal courts in the past 18 28 19 E
Resources required to pursue criminal charges outweigh losses 15 59 27
Incident did not exceed business' risk tolerance 10 28 13
Other 2 2 20 F
Fear of negative publicity 1 2 8
Company policy 1 17 F
Fear of litigation 1 F 10
1.
Includes reasons such as: because the incident could be legally prosecuted; to comply with insurance requirements; reporting varies based on the type of fraud.
2.
Includes reasons such as: insufficient evidence; and reporting varies based on the type of fraud.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, Survey of Fraud Against Businesses, 2007/2008.
Date modified: