by Shelly Milligan
This report examines the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the Aboriginal population living in the census agglomeration (CA) of Fredericton.1 The First Nations reserve communities of St. Mary’s 24 and Devon 30 of Saint Mary’s and Kingsclear 6 of Kingsclear are located within the CA of Fredericton. The 2006 Census and 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS), which provide an extensive set of data about Aboriginal people, are the data sources.
The report focuses on the Aboriginal identity population, which refers to those people who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, that is, North American Indian, Métis or Inuit, and/or those who reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation.
The term ‘First Nations’ is used throughout the report to refer to people who identified as North American Indian. The term ‘Aboriginal population’ is used to refer to the Aboriginal identity population.
There were 1,172,790 Aboriginal people in Canada in 2006, accounting for 3.8% of Canada’s total population.
In 2006, a total of 17,655 Aboriginal people lived in New Brunswick, representing 2% of the provincial population.
There were 2,375 Aboriginal people living in the census agglomeration of Fredericton, which represented 3% of the total population of the CA. By comparison, the CA of Miramichi, with 1,300 Aboriginal people, had a larger proportion of Aboriginal people in that the Aboriginal population represented 5% of that CA’s total population.
Between 2001 and 2006, the Aboriginal population in Fredericton decreased by 10%, from 2,635 to 2,375 people. The First Nations population decreased by 10%, while the Métis population decreased by 19%.
In 2006, 1,990 persons identified as First Nations people accounting for the majority (84%) of the Fredericton CA’s Aboriginal population. Another 220 identified as Métis and 40 as Inuit. The Métis accounted for 9% of the Aboriginal population while Inuit accounted for about 2%.2
Of those who identified as First Nations people in 2006, the majority (85%) reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada.
The census provides a statistical portrait of Canada and its people. The most recent census was on May 16, 2006.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS) was conducted between October 2006 and March 2007. The survey provides extensive data on Inuit, Métis and off-reserve First Nations children aged 6 to 14 and those aged 15 and over living in urban, rural and northern locations across Canada. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey was designed to provide data on the social and economic conditions of Aboriginal people in Canada (excluding reserves).
It was possible to report both single and multiple responses to the Aboriginal identity questions on the census and the Aboriginal Peoples Survey. Census data used in this article for First Nations people, Métis and Inuit are based on the single responses only. Total Aboriginal identity population counts include people, who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, and/or those who reported being a registered or Treaty Indian, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey data represent a combination of both the single and multiple Aboriginal identity populations.
Data have been provided for the total Aboriginal identity population and in some cases they have been broken down by Aboriginal group, sex and age group. For Aboriginal groups where the census count of the population aged 15 years and over is 200 or less, only the census count has been provided. No further data are shown due to potential data quality issues that can result from small counts that arise when several variables are cross-tabulated.
The Aboriginal population living in the census agglomeration (CA) of Fredericton is slightly younger than the non-Aboriginal population. In 2006, the median age3 of the Aboriginal population in Fredericton was 27 years, compared to 39 years for the non-Aboriginal population.
In 2006, almost half (48%) of the Aboriginal people in Fredericton were under the age of 25, compared to 31% of the non-Aboriginal population. Furthermore, 4% of Aboriginal people were 65 years and over, compared to 12% of the non-Aboriginal population. About 28% of Aboriginal people in Fredericton were under the age of 15, compared to 17% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts (chart 1). For more details on the age distribution, (see table 1 in the appendix).
Aboriginal children aged 14 years and under represented 5% of the CA’s children. About one in three (28%) of the First Nations people and the Métis (27%) were 14 years of age and under.
Chart 1 Population pyramid for the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations, Fredericton, 2006
In 2006, 63% of Aboriginal children aged 14 and under lived with both parents compared with 81% of non-Aboriginal children. Aboriginal children were more likely to live with a lone parent (28%) than their non-Aboriginal counterparts (18%) (see table 2 in the appendix).
Overall, in 2006, Aboriginal youth aged 15 to 24 living in Fredericton were less likely to be attending school than their non-Aboriginal counterparts (42% versus 67%). However, Aboriginal people had a slightly greater tendency to return to school later in life than did non-Aboriginal people. Of those aged 45 years and older, 8% of Aboriginal people were in school in 2006, compared to 4% of the non-Aboriginal population (see table 3 in the appendix).
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey found that, among the Aboriginal population living in the Atlantic provinces, (excluding reserves), men and women had different reasons for not completing high school. For young Aboriginal men aged 15 to 34, the most commonly reported reason was ‘wanted to work’, followed by ‘bored with school’ and ‘had to work’, while Aboriginal women reported ‘bored with school’, followed by ‘pregnancy’.
About half of Aboriginal men (53%) and Aboriginal women (54%) aged 25 to 64 had completed postsecondary education, compared to 65% of non-Aboriginal men and 66% of non-Aboriginal women. Postsecondary education includes a trades certificate, a college diploma or a university certificate, diploma or degree. Aboriginal men (26%) and women (8%) were more likely than their non-Aboriginal male (12%) and female (6%) counterparts to have obtained a trades qualification (see text table 1).
In 2006, the unemployment rate4 for the Aboriginal core working age population (aged 25 to 54) in Fredericton was higher than that of the non-Aboriginal population (20.2% compared to 4.9%). Unemployment rates were slightly higher for Aboriginal men (22.7%) in Fredericton than they were for Aboriginal women (18.4%).
Another measure of labour market performance is the employment rate.5 In 2006, the employment rates for the Aboriginal population were found to be lower than those of the non-Aboriginal population. The employment rates of Aboriginal men and women were similar at about 65.0%. In contrast, the employment rates for their non-Aboriginal counterparts were 87.7% and 79.5 respectively (see table 4 in the appendix).
Almost four in 10 (37%) Aboriginal people living in Fredericton were working full time full year6 in 2005. This percentage was slightly lower than that of the non-Aboriginal population (41%).
Aboriginal women (41%) were more likely than their male counterparts (32%) to be full-time full-year workers. Non-Aboriginal men (47%) were more likely than their female counterparts (36%) to be full-time full-year workers.
In studying the labour market of a given area, it is helpful to examine its occupational7 make-up. In 2006, the three most common occupational categories8 for both the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal experienced labour forces in Fredericton were ‘sales and service’, ‘trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations’ and ‘business, finance and administrative’. Aboriginal people were slightly more likely than non-Aboriginal people to work in ‘trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations’ (15% versus 12%) (see table 5 in the appendix).
In 2000, the median earnings9 of full-time full-year Aboriginal earners in Fredericton (measured in 2005 dollars) were about $29,100. By 2005, this had slightly increased to about $29,800. Aboriginal people who worked full time full year in 2005 earned less than their non-Aboriginal counterparts at over $37,700. In addition, the gap between median earnings narrowed slightly. In 2000, Aboriginal people in Fredericton working full time full year earned 75% of what their non-Aboriginal counterparts were earning. By 2005, this percentage had increased to 79% (see table 6 in the appendix).
The census collects a number of measures of income that help in understanding the economic situation of a population. Earnings data have been provided for the population working full time full year in 2005. It is also useful to look at total income10 as sources of income go beyond that of employment. In 2005, just over one in 10 (11%) Aboriginal people with income in Fredericton had a total income of $40,000 or over, compared to just under three in 10 (29%) of their non-Aboriginal counterparts. In 2005, Aboriginal men had the lowest median income ($13,800), whether compared to Aboriginal women ($18,200) or to non-Aboriginal men ($31,600) or non-Aboriginal women ($21,500) (see table 7 in the appendix).
Additionally, in Fredericton, 7% of the Aboriginal population aged 15 years and over and 4% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts reported having no income in 2005 (data not shown).
Statistics Canada uses the concept of low income cut-off (LICO)11 to indicate an income threshold below which a family will likely devote a larger share of its income on the necessities of food, shelter and clothing than the average family. In 2005, in Fredericton about one-quarter (24%) of Aboriginal people12 were living under the LICO, compared to 13% of non-Aboriginal people. In addition, about one-third (33%) of Aboriginal children (aged 14 years and under) in Fredericton were living under the LICO, compared to 14% of non-Aboriginal children (data not shown). These data are based on the before-tax LICO.
The census counts people where they are living on one particular day. On May 16, 2006 (the date of the 2006 Census) there were 2,375 Aboriginal people living in the census agglomeration area of Fredericton. This count does not include all of the Aboriginal people who may have lived in Fredericton at some point during the year, but only those who were living in Fredericton on that particular day.13
Moreover, census population counts may not reflect the possibility that people move between communities—for example, someone might move from a reserve community to a large city and back again within the same year. In Fredericton, in 2006, over half (63%) of the Aboriginal population had lived at the same address five years ago, compared to 59% of the non-Aboriginal population. From 2001 to 2006, just over one in 10 (16%) Aboriginal people had moved at least once within Fredericton, and the rest (21%) had moved to Fredericton from another community. A community may refer to another municipality, or a reserve, or a rural area (see table 8 in the appendix).
In Fredericton, the share of Aboriginal people living in homes requiring major repairs14 was 21% in 2006, compared to 20% in 2001. In comparison, the share of Fredericton non-Aboriginal population living in dwellings in need of major repairs was 7% in 2006 and 8% in 2001 (see table 9 in the appendix).
The share of Aboriginal people living in crowded15 homes was 2% in 2006 and 3% in 2001. In comparison, the share of Fredericton non-Aboriginal population living in crowded homes was 1% in both 2006 and in 2001.
In the Atlantic provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador), the majority of First Nations people living off reserve (aged 15 and over) rated their health as excellent or very good in 2006. When asked as part of the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey whether their health was excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, 54% of the adult First Nations population living off reserve gave themselves a rating of excellent or very good. Furthermore, 25% of First Nations people reported that their health was good.
Similarly, the majority of Métis (aged 15 and over) living in the Atlantic provinces rated their health as excellent or very good in 2006. When asked as part of the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey whether their health was excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, 61% of the adult Métis population gave themselves a rating of excellent or very good. Furthermore, 24% of Métis people reported that their health was good.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey also inquired about chronic conditions16 that had been diagnosed by a health professional. Over half (59%) of the First Nations adult population (aged 15 and over) living off reserve in the Atlantic provinces, had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Arthritis or rheumatism was the most commonly reported condition affecting 27% of adults followed by high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (25%), respiratory problems 20% and other long-term health conditions (17%).
Among the Métis adult population (aged 15 and over) living in the Atlantic provinces, 57% had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Arthritis or rheumatism (24%) and high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (24%) were the most commonly reported conditions affecting adults followed by respiratory problems (18%) and other long-term health conditions (16%).