by Shelly Milligan
This report examines the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the Aboriginal population living in the census metropolitan area (CMA) of Halifax.1 The following First Nations reserve communities are located within the census metropolitan area boundaries of Halifax: Sheet Harbour 36, Beaver Lake 17 and Cole Harbour 30 of Millbrook and Shubenacadie 13 of Shubenacadie. The 2006 Census and 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS), which provide an extensive set of data about Aboriginal people, are the data sources.
The report focuses on the Aboriginal identity population, which refers to those people who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, that is, North American Indian, Métis or Inuit, and/or those who reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation.
The term ‘First Nations’ is used throughout the report to refer to people who identified as North American Indian. The term ‘Aboriginal population’ is used to refer to the Aboriginal identity population.
There were 1,172,790 Aboriginal people in Canada in 2006, accounting for 3.8% of Canada’s total population.
In 2006, a total of 24,175 Aboriginal people lived in Nova Scotia, representing 3% of the provincial population.
The census metropolitan area of Halifax, with 5,320 Aboriginal people, had the largest Aboriginal population of any city in Nova Scotia in 2006—more than four times the Aboriginal population living in Truro (1,250), which had the third largest Aboriginal population.
In 2006, 1% of the total population of Halifax was Aboriginal. By comparison, Cape Breton, with 4,675 Aboriginal people, had the largest proportion (4%) of Aboriginal people.
Between 2001 and 2006, the Aboriginal population in Halifax grew by 51%, from 3,525 to 5,320 people. The First Nations population grew by 28%, while the Métis grew by 120%.
In 2006, 3,000 persons identified as First Nations people, accounting for 56% of the CMA’s Aboriginal population. Another 1,755 identified as Métis and 150 as Inuit. The Métis accounted for about one-third (33%) of the Aboriginal population while Inuit accounted for 3%. Those reporting multiple or other Aboriginal responses accounted for 8%.2
Of those who identified as First Nations people in 2006, about four in 10 (43%) reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada.
The census provides a statistical portrait of Canada and its people. The most recent census was on May 16, 2006.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS) was conducted between October 2006 and March 2007. The survey provides extensive data on Inuit, Métis and off-reserve First Nations children aged 6 to 14 and those aged 15 and over living in urban, rural and northern locations across Canada. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey was designed to provide data on the social and economic conditions of Aboriginal people in Canada (excluding reserves).
It was possible to report both single and multiple responses to the Aboriginal identity questions on the census and the Aboriginal Peoples Survey. Census data used in this article for First Nations people, Métis and Inuit are based on the single responses only. Total Aboriginal identity population counts include people, who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, and/or those who reported being a registered or Treaty Indian, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey data represent a combination of both the single and multiple Aboriginal identity populations.
Data have been provided for the total Aboriginal identity population and in some cases they have been broken down by Aboriginal group, sex and age group. For Aboriginal groups where the census count of the population aged 15 years and over is 200 or less, only the census count has been provided. No further data are shown due to potential data quality issues that can result from small counts that arise when several variables are cross-tabulated.
The Aboriginal population living in Halifax in 2006 was younger than the non-Aboriginal population. The median age3 of the Aboriginal population in Halifax was 30 years, compared to 39 years for the non-Aboriginal population.
Close to four in 10 (41%) of the Aboriginal people in Halifax were under the age of 25, compared to three in 10 (30%) of non-Aboriginal people. Furthermore, only 4% of Aboriginal people were 65 years and over, compared to 12% of the non-Aboriginal population. Slightly more than two in 10 (22%) Aboriginal people in Halifax were under the age of 15, compared to 16% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts (chart 1). For more details on the age distribution, see table 1 in the appendix.
Aboriginal children aged 14 years and under represented 2% of the CMA’s children. Close to one-quarter (24%) of the First Nations population was 14 years of age and under, while 19% of the Métis population were in this same age group.
Chart 1 Population pyramid for the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations, Halifax, 2006
In 2006, almost two-thirds of the Aboriginal children aged 14 and under (65%) lived with both parents, whereas the proportion was 78% among non-Aboriginal children. Compared with their non-Aboriginal peers, Aboriginal children were more likely to live with a lone parent in Halifax (32% versus 21%) (see table 2 in the appendix).
Overall, in 2006, Aboriginal youth aged 15 to 24 living in Halifax were slightly less likely to be attending school than their non-Aboriginal counterparts (65% versus 69%). Furthermore, Aboriginal people had a slightly greater tendency to return to school later in life than did non-Aboriginal people. For example, 12% of Aboriginal women 35 to 44 years of age attended school in 2006, compared to 10% of non-Aboriginal women in the same age group (see table 3 in the appendix).
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey found that among the Aboriginal population, living in the Atlantic provinces, (excluding reserves), men and women had different reasons for not completing high school. For young Aboriginal men aged 15 to 34, the most commonly reported reason was ‘wanted to work’, followed by ‘bored with school’ and ‘had to work’, while Aboriginal women reported ‘bored with school’, followed by ‘pregnancy’.
Over half of Aboriginal men (62%) and of Aboriginal women (64%) aged 25 to 64 had completed postsecondary education, similar to their non-Aboriginal counterparts (66% and 69% respectively). Postsecondary education includes a trades certificate, a college diploma or a university certificate, diploma or degree. Aboriginal men and women were more likely to have obtained a trade or college credential than their non-Aboriginal male and female counterparts. However, Aboriginal men (16%) and women (17%) were less likely than their non-Aboriginal male and female counterparts (28% and 31%, respectively) to have obtained a university degree (see text table 1).
In Halifax, 23% of Aboriginal men aged 25 to 34 reported having a university degree, in the 2006 Census, compared to 16% of their female counterparts. (This includes all certificates, diplomas or a degree at the bachelor’s level or above.). Aboriginal men of 25 to 34 years of age were more likely to have a university degree (23%) than older Aboriginal men of 35 to 64 years of age (12%). On the other hand, Aboriginal women 25 to 34 years of age were less likely to have a university degree than older Aboriginal women of 35 to 64 years of age (16% compared to 17%) (see chart 2).
Regardless of their age group or sex, Aboriginal people living in Halifax in 2006 were less likely than their non-Aboriginal counterparts to have a university degree.
In 2006, the unemployment rate4 for the Aboriginal core working age population (aged 25 to 54) in Halifax was higher than that of the non-Aboriginal population (8.1% compared to 4.7%). The First Nations population had an unemployment rate of 6.2%, while the unemployment rate for the Métis was 10.4%. Unemployment rates were slightly higher among Aboriginal women (8.9%) than men (6.8%), while the unemployment rates for non-Aboriginal women and men were similar (4.8% versus 4.5%) (see chart 3).
Unemployment rates were higher for Halifax's young people. In 2006, 17.3% of Aboriginal youth aged 15 to 24 compared with 14.2% of non-Aboriginal youth (see table 4 in the appendix).
Another measure of labour market performance is the employment rate.5 In 2006, the employment rate for the total Aboriginal population aged 25 to 54 living in Halifax was 76.1%, while the rate for the non-Aboriginal population was 82.8%. First Nations men and women aged 25 to 54 living in Halifax had employment rates (81.6% and 74.1%, respectively) that most resembled those of non-Aboriginal men (86.8%) and non-Aboriginal women (79.0%). The employment rates were lower for Métis men (76.8%) and women (69.3%) than the non-Aboriginal population (see table 5 in the appendix).
About four in 10 (41%) Aboriginal people living in Halifax were working full time full year6 in 2005. This percentage was similar to that of the non-Aboriginal population (42%).
Men were more likely than women to be full-time full-year workers. Half (50%) of Aboriginal men worked full time full year compared to about one-third (34%) of Aboriginal women. Likewise, 48% of non-Aboriginal men and 36% of non-Aboriginal women worked full time full year in 2005. This was also the case for Métis men (56%) and women (33%), as well as First Nations men (41%) and women (35%) (see text table 2).
In studying the labour market of a given area, it is helpful to examine its occupational7 make-up. In 2006, common occupational categories8 for both the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal experienced labour forces in Halifax included ‘sales and service’ (33% versus 27%), and ‘business, finance and administrative (21% versus 20%) (see table 6 in the appendix).
Since 2000, Aboriginal people who worked full time full year earned less than their non-Aboriginal counterparts. In 2000, the median earnings9 of full-time full-year Aboriginal earners in Halifax (measured in 2005 dollars) were about $35,100, less than the amount the non-Aboriginal population earned ($39,400). While the median earnings remained constant for the Aboriginal population ($35,100) in 2005, the median earnings of non-Aboriginals rose to approximately $40,300 in 2005.
In 2000, Aboriginal people in Halifax working full time full year earned 89% of what their non-Aboriginal counterparts were earning. By 2005, this percentage had decreased to 87% (see table 7 in the appendix).
The census collects a number of measures of income that help in understanding the economic situation of a population. Earnings data have been provided for the population working full time full year in 2005. It is also useful to look at total income10 as sources of income go beyond that of employment. In 2005, just under one-quarter (24%) of Aboriginal people with income in Halifax had a total income of $40,000 or over compared to close to one-third (32%) of their non-Aboriginal counterparts.
In 2005, Aboriginal women had a lower median income ($18,100) than Aboriginal men ($26,000) (see table 8 in the appendix).
Additionally, in Halifax, 6% of the Aboriginal population aged 15 years and over and 5% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts reported having no income in 2005 (data not shown).
Statistics Canada uses the concept of low income cut-off (LICO)11 to indicate an income threshold below which a family will likely devote a larger share of its income on the necessities of food, shelter and clothing than the average family. In 2005, in Halifax one in four (25%) Aboriginal people12were living under the LICO, compared to 14% of non-Aboriginal people. In addition, 30% of Aboriginal children (aged 14 years and under) in Halifax were living under the LICO, compared to 16% of non-Aboriginal children (data not shown). These data are based on the before-tax LICO (see chart 4).
The census counts people where they are living on one particular day. On May 16, 2006 (the date of the 2006 Census), there were 5,320 Aboriginal people living in the census metropolitan area (CMA) of Halifax. This count does not include all of the Aboriginal people who may have lived in Halifax at some point during the year, but only those who were living in Halifax on that particular day.13
Moreover, census population counts may not reflect the possibility that people move between communities—for example, someone might move from a reserve community to a large city and back again within the same year. In Halifax, in 2006, 50% of the Aboriginal population had lived at the same address five years ago, compared to 59% of the non-Aboriginal population. From 2001 to 2006, just over three in 10 (31%) Aboriginal people had moved at least once within Halifax, while 19% had moved to Halifax from another community. A community may refer to another municipality, or a reserve, or a rural area (see table 9 in the appendix).
When asked on the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey why they moved to their current city, town or community, most Aboriginal people aged 15 and over in the Atlantic provinces (excluding reserves) reported family-related reasons, followed by work-related reasons.
In Halifax, the share of Aboriginal people living in homes requiring major repairs14 was 12% in 2006, compared to 16% in 2001. In comparison, the share of the non-Aboriginal population living in dwellings in need of major repairs was 7% in 2006 and 8% in 2001 (see table 10 in the appendix)
The share of Aboriginal people living in crowded15 homes was 1% in 2006 and 2% in 2001. In comparison, the share of the non-Aboriginal population living in crowded homes was 1% in both 2006 and in 2001.
In the Atlantic provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador), Aboriginal adults aged 15 and over and living off reserve were asked to rate their health as part of the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey. When asked whether their health was excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, 57% of the adult Aboriginal population gave themselves a rating of excellent or very good, and another 25% of the adult Aboriginal population reported that their health was good.
Similarly, 61% of Métis and 54% of First Nations (aged 15 and over) living off reserve in the Atlantic provinces rated their health as excellent or very good in 2006. Another, 24% of Métis and 25% of First Nations living off reserve reported that their health was good.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey also inquired about chronic conditions16 that had been diagnosed by a health professional. Over half (58%) of the adult (aged 15 and over) Aboriginal population living off reserve in the Atlantic provinces reported that they had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Among the Aboriginal population, the most frequently reported conditions were: arthritis or rheumatism (25%), high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (24%), respiratory problems (19%) and other long-term health conditions (16%).17
Among the First Nations adult population (aged 15 and over) living off reserve in the Atlantic provinces, 59% had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Arthritis or rheumatism was the most commonly reported condition, affecting 27% of adults, followed by high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (25%), respiratory problems (20%) and other long-term health conditions (17%).
Among the Métis adult population (aged 15 and over) living in the Atlantic provinces, 57% had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Arthritis or rheumatism (24%) and high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (24%) were the most commonly reported conditions affecting adults, followed by respiratory problems (18%) and other long-term health conditions (16%).