by Thomas Anderson
This report examines the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the Aboriginal population living in the census metropolitan area (CMA) of Regina.1 The 2006 Census and 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS), which provide an extensive set of data about Aboriginal people, are the data sources.
The report focuses on the Aboriginal identity population, which refers to those people who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, that is, North American Indian, Métis or Inuit, and/or those who reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation.
The term ‘First Nations’ is used throughout the report to refer to people who identified as North American Indian. The term ‘Aboriginal population’ is used to refer to the Aboriginal identity population.
There were 1,172,790 Aboriginal people in Canada in 2006, accounting for 3.8% of Canada’s total population.
In 2006, a total of 141,890 Aboriginal people lived in Saskatchewan, representing 15% of the provincial population.
The census metropolitan area of Regina, with 17,110 Aboriginal people, had the second largest Aboriginal population of any city in Saskatchewan in 2006—only Saskatoon had a larger Aboriginal population, at 21,535.
In 2006, 9% of the total population of Regina was Aboriginal. By comparison, Saskatoon, with a larger total population, also had an Aboriginal population that accounted for 9% of its total population, while Prince Albert had 13,570 Aboriginal people, which accounted for more than a third (34%) of that city’s total population.
Between 2001 and 2006, the Aboriginal population in Regina grew by 9%, from 15,685 to 17,110 people. The First Nations population grew by 3%, while the Métis population grew by 20%.
In 2006, 9,495 persons identified as First Nations people accounting for more than half (55%) of the city’s Aboriginal population, another 7,185 identified as Métis, and 20 as Inuit. The Métis accounted for 42% of the Aboriginal population while Inuit accounted for less than 1%. Another 2% reported multiple or other Aboriginal responses.2
Of those who identified as First Nations people in 2006, almost all (94%) reported being a Treaty Indian or a registered Indian as defined by the Indian Act of Canada.
The census provides a statistical portrait of Canada and its people. The most recent census was on May 16, 2006.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS) was conducted between October 2006 and March 2007. The survey provides extensive data on Inuit, Métis and off-reserve First Nations children aged 6 to 14 and those aged 15 and over living in urban, rural and northern locations across Canada. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey was designed to provide data on the social and economic conditions of Aboriginal people in Canada (excluding reserves).
It was possible to report both single and multiple responses to the Aboriginal identity questions on the census and the Aboriginal Peoples Survey. Census data used in this article for First Nations people, Métis and Inuit are based on the single responses only. Total Aboriginal identity population counts include people who reported identifying with at least one Aboriginal group, and/or those who reported being a Registered or Treaty Indian, and/or those who reported they were members of an Indian band or First Nation. The Aboriginal Peoples Survey data represent a combination of both the single and multiple Aboriginal identity populations.
Data have been provided for the total Aboriginal identity population and in some cases they have been broken down by Aboriginal group, sex and age group. For Aboriginal groups where the census count of the population aged 15 years and over is 200 or less, only the census count has been provided. No further data are shown due to potential data quality issues that can result from small counts that arise when several variables are cross-tabulated.
The Aboriginal population living in Regina is younger than the non-Aboriginal population. In 2006, the median age3 of the Aboriginal population in Regina was 22 years, compared to about 39 years for the non-Aboriginal population.
In 2006, more than half (56%) Aboriginal people were under the age of 25, compared to 32% of non-Aboriginal people. Furthermore, only 2% of Aboriginal people were 65 years and over, compared to 13% of the non-Aboriginal population. More than one-third (35%) of Aboriginal people in Regina were under the age of 15, compared to 16% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts (chart 1). For more details on the age distribution, see table 1 in the appendix.
Aboriginal children aged 14 years and under represented 17% of the census metropolitan area’s children. Four in 10 (40%) First Nations people were 14 years of age and under, compared to over one in four (27%) Métis.
Chart 1 Population pyramid for the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations, Regina, 2006
In 2006, four in 10 Aboriginal children aged 14 and under (39%) lived with both parents. Compared with their non-Aboriginal peers, Aboriginal children were more likely to live with a lone mother (45% versus 16%), a lone father (7% versus 3%), a grandparent (with no parent present) (4% versus less than 1%) or with another relative (5% versus less than 1%) (see table 2 in the appendix).
Overall, in 2006, Aboriginal youth aged 15 to 24 living in Regina had lower school attendance rates than their non-Aboriginal counterparts (57% versus 65%). However, Aboriginal people have a slightly greater tendency to return to school later in life than do non-Aboriginal people. For example, 10% of Aboriginal men and 14% of women 35 years of age and older4 were attending school in 2006, compared to 5% of non-Aboriginal men and 6% of women (see table 3 in the appendix).
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey found that among the Aboriginal population in Saskatchewan (excluding reserves), men and women had different reasons for not completing high school. For young Aboriginal men aged 15 to 34, the most commonly reported reason was ‘wanted to work’ followed by ‘had to work’ while Aboriginal women reported ‘pregnancy/taking care of children’ followed by ‘bored with school’.
Aboriginal men (40%) and women (46%) aged 25 to 64 were less likely to have completed a postsecondary education than their non-Aboriginal counterparts (58% and 61%, respectively). Postsecondary education includes a trades certificate, a college diploma or a university certificate, diploma or degree. Among Aboriginal men who completed a postsecondary education, the largest number did so with a trades credential while Aboriginal women were more likely to obtain a college diploma. The non-Aboriginal population was more likely to obtain a university certificate, diploma or degree (see text table 1).
In 2006, about one-quarter of Aboriginal men (26%) and Aboriginal women (23%), aged 25 to 64 years, had less than a high school education, compared to 13% of non-Aboriginal men and 10% of non-Aboriginal women.
In Regina, 13% of young Aboriginal women aged 25 to 34 reported having a university degree, compared to 9% of their male counterparts. (This includes all certificates, diplomas or degrees at the bachelor’s level or above.) Furthermore, older Aboriginal women (35 to 64 years of age) were also more likely to have a university degree than Aboriginal men 35 to 64 years of age (14% versus 10%) (see chart 2).
Regardless of their age group or sex, Aboriginal people living in Regina in 2006, were less likely than their non-Aboriginal counterparts to have a university degree.
In 2006, the unemployment rate5 for the Aboriginal core working age population (aged 25 to 54) in Regina was four times higher than that of the non-Aboriginal population (12.0% compared to 2.9%). The unemployment rates for First Nations people (20.1%) and Métis (5.5%) were also higher than that of the non-Aboriginal population 2.9%).
Unemployment rates were higher for Regina’s young people than for those of core working age (25 to 54 years), across all identity groups. In 2006, 30.9% of First Nations youth aged 15 to 24 years were unemployed, as were 13.4% of Métis youth, and 9.8% of non-Aboriginal youth (see table 4 in the appendix).
Another measure of labour market performance is the employment rate6. In 2006, First Nations people aged 25 to 54 living in Regina had lower employment rates (51.4%) than the non-Aboriginal population (86.9%). The Métis employment rate was 82.2%. In 2006, Aboriginal men (73.2%) had higher employment rates than Aboriginal women (60.1%) (see table 5 in the appendix).
Just over three in 10 (31%) Aboriginal people who lived in Regina were working full time full year7 in 2005. This percentage is lower than that of the non-Aboriginal population (44%).
Men were more likely than women to be full-time full-year workers. More than one-third (35%) of Aboriginal men and half (50%) of non-Aboriginal men worked full time full year compared to 27% of Aboriginal women and 39% of non-Aboriginal women.
Métis men (43%) in the Regina labour force were more likely than Métis women (34%) and First Nations men (27%) to be working full time full year in 2005. First Nations men (27%) were also more likely to be working full time full year than First Nations women (21%) (see text table 2).
In studying the labour market of a given area, it is helpful to examine its occupational8 make-up. In 2006, the two most common occupational categories9 for both the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal experienced labour forces in Regina were ‘sales and service’ and ‘business, finance and administrative’. However, the kinds of jobs people hold differ for men and women. Men were more likely than women to work in ‘trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations’ while women were more likely to work in ‘business, finance and administrative occupations’. This holds true for both the Aboriginal and the non-Aboriginal populations in Regina.
In 2006, Aboriginal men were somewhat more likely than their non-Aboriginal counterparts to work in ‘trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations’ (31% versus 25%). Aboriginal women were somewhat more likely than non-Aboriginal women to have ‘sales and service’ jobs (35% versus 27%) (see table 6 in the appendix).
In 2000, the median earnings10 of full-time full-year Aboriginal earners in Regina (measured in 2005 dollars) were about $33,700. By 2005, this had increased to approximately $35,400. However, despite the increase in earnings among Aboriginal people who worked full time full year in 2005, they continued to earn less than their non-Aboriginal counterparts. In 2000, Aboriginal people in Regina working full time full year earned 84% of what their non-Aboriginal counterparts were earning. By 2005, this percentage had not changed (see table 7 in the appendix).
The census collects a number of measures of income that help in understanding the economic situation of a population. Earnings data have been provided for the population working full time full year in 2005. It is also useful to look at total income11 as sources of income go beyond that of employment. In 2005, Aboriginal people with income in Regina (19%) were less likely than the non-Aboriginal population (36%) to have a total income of $40,000 and over. In 2005, Aboriginal women had a lower median income ($17,017) than Aboriginal men ($19,160) (see table 8 in the appendix).
Additionally, in Regina, 10% of the Aboriginal population aged 15 years and over and 4% of their non-Aboriginal counterparts reported having no income in 2005 (data not shown).
Statistics Canada uses the concept of low income cut-off (LICO)12 to indicate an income threshold below which a family will likely devote a larger share of its income on the necessities of food, shelter and clothing than the average family. In 2005, in Regina over four in 10 (43%) of Aboriginal people were living under the LICO, compared to 11% of non-Aboriginal people. In addition, more than half (52%) of Aboriginal children (aged 14 years and under) in Regina were living under the LICO, compared to 13% of non-Aboriginal children (data not shown). These data are based on the before-tax LICO.
The census counts people where they are living on one particular day. On May 16, 2006 (the date of the 2006 Census) there were 17,110 Aboriginal people living in the census metropolitan area of Regina. This count does not include all of the Aboriginal people who may have lived in Regina at some point during the year, but only those who were living in Regina on that particular day.13
Moreover, many people move between communities—for example, someone might move from a reserve community to a large city and back again within the same year. In Regina, in 2006, about one-third (35%) of the Aboriginal population had lived at the same address five years ago, compared to 61% of the non-Aboriginal population. From 2001 to 2006, 44% of Aboriginal people had moved at least once within Regina while 21% had moved to Regina from another community. A community may refer to another municipality, or a reserve, or a rural area (see table 9 in the appendix).
When asked on the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey why they moved to their current city, town or community, most Aboriginal people, aged 15 and over, in Saskatchewan (excluding reserves) reported family-related reasons, followed by work-related reasons.
In Regina, more than one in eight (14%) Aboriginal people lived in homes requiring major repairs14 in 2006, compared to 17% in 2001. In comparison, the share of Regina’s non-Aboriginal population living in dwellings in need of major repairs was unchanged at 7% in both 2006 and 2001 (see table 10 in the appendix).
The share of Aboriginal people living in crowded15 homes increased to 9% in 2006 from 6% in 2001. The comparable rates for the non-Aboriginal population were about 1% in both 2006 and 2001.
The majority of First Nations adults (aged 15 and over) living off reserve in Regina rated their health as excellent, very good or good in 2006. When asked as part of the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey whether their health was excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, half (47%) of the adult First Nations population living off reserve gave themselves a rating of excellent or very good, and 29% of First Nations people reported that their health was good.
Similarly, the majority of Métis (aged 15 and over) living in Regina rated their health as excellent, very good or good in 2006. When asked as part of the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey whether their health was excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, 57% of the adult Métis population gave themselves a rating of excellent or very good. Furthermore, 26% of Métis people reported that their health was good.
The 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey also inquired about chronic conditions16 that had been diagnosed by a health professional. Close to half of First Nations (49%) adults (aged 15 and over) living off reserve in Regina reported that they had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Among the First Nations adult population living off reserve, the most frequently reported conditions were: arthritis or rheumatism (19%), high blood pressure, heart problems or effects of a stroke (17%) and respiratory problems (14%).17
Among the Métis adult population (aged 15 and over) living in Regina, 52% had been diagnosed with at least one chronic condition. Arthritis or rheumatism was the most commonly reported condition affecting 19% of adults, followed by respiratory problems (18%), stomach problems or intestinal ulcers (16%) and high blood pressure and heart problems or effects of a stroke (15%).