Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
The Daily. Thursday, March 29, 2001
The quarterly estimates of productivity are meant to help those who focus on the analysis of the short-run relationship between output, employment, remuneration and hours worked. They are highly volatile, subject to revision, and should be used with caution to infer long-run trends. Labour productivity growth in the business sector was up 0.7% in the fourth quarter compared with the last quarter of 1999. The growth of productivity registered in the fourth quarter represented a slowdown relative to the three previous quarters of 2000. The revised year-over-year growth rates for the three previous quarters were 1.1% in the third, 2.1% in the second and 1.8% in the first quarter.
The slowing of productivity growth occurred in the context of lower domestic demand and hours worked. As is often the case when the growth rate in the economy begins to decline, the growth of hours worked slowed relatively less than did output over the last quarter of 2000.
Despite the slowdown in the fourth quarter, the succession of quarterly increases in the early part of the year was sufficient to produce an average annual gain of 1.4% for 2000. This is slightly lower than the 1.7% registered in 1999, but higher than the average annual increase of 1.0% seen since 1988.
During the period 1988 to 2000, the annual growth of productivity has fluctuated between -0.5% and 2.4%. The largest increase occurred in 1992, and the only decrease in 1996.
Growth in unit labour cost occurs when wage increases are growing more than labour productivity. During the fourth quarter, hourly compensation gained 3.9%; labour productivity growth increased 0.7%. Consequently, unit wage costs rose 3.1%.
|
This quarterly increase follows relatively constant increases, which fluctuated between 2.0% and 2.5% during the three previous quarters of 2000. These results for 2000 contrast with those of 1999 when unit labour cost growth remained close to zero for the three last quarters of 2000. On an annual basis, unit labour costs increased by 2.5% in 2000, compared with 0.3% in 1999. However, the unit labour cost increases in 2000 were about the same as those seen in 1997 and 1998.
Available on CANSIM: matrix 9484.
These series are available from the first quarter of 1987 up to the third quarter of 2000. These data are normally published 10 weeks after the end of the reference quarter.
For more information on concepts and definitions, a technical note is available on request. For more information, contact John Baldwin (613-951-8588; baldjoh@statcan.gc.ca) or Jean-Pierre Maynard, (613-951-3654; maynard@statcan.gc.ca); fax: 613-951-5403; Micro-economic Analysis Division.
Business sector: Labour productivity and related variables
Year | Quarter | Labour productivity | Real value added | Hours worked | Hourly compensation | Unit labour costs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% change from the previous year | ||||||
1988 | 0.2 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 6.0 | |
1989 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
1990 | 0.1 | -0.5 | -0.6 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
1991 | 1.0 | -3.3 | -4.2 | 5.4 | 4.4 | |
1992 | 2.4 | 0.5 | -1.8 | 3.2 | 0.9 | |
1993 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.7 | -0.7 | |
1994 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 0.0 | -2.2 | |
1995 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 0.6 | |
1996 | -0.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 2.1 | |
1997 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 2.4 | |
1998 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 2.5 | |
1999 | 1.7 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.3 | |
2000 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 2.5 | |
% change from previous quarter, seasonally adjusted | ||||||
1998 | First | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Second | 0.8 | 0.6 | -0.2 | 2.1 | 1.3 | |
Third | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -0.3 | |
Fourth | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.4 | |
1999 | First | -0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | -0.6 | -0.4 |
Second | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | |
Third | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -0.4 | |
Fourth | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | |
2000 | First | -0.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Second | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | |
Third | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
Fourth | -0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | |
% change from corresponding quarter of previous year, seasonally adjusted | ||||||
1998 | First | 0.8 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 2.5 |
Second | 1.5 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 2.6 | |
Third | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 2.3 | |
Fourth | 1.8 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 2.6 | |
1999 | First | 1.5 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
Second | 1.1 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.2 | |
Third | 2.3 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 0.1 | |
Fourth | 1.8 | 5.9 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | |
2000 | First | 1.8 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 2.5 |
Second | 2.1 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 2.0 | |
Third | 1.1 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 2.4 | |
Fourth | 0.7 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 3.1 |