Table C.4.4
Estimated average scores of 15-year-old students, combined reading scale, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Canada and provinces, 2000 and 2009

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Standard table symbols

Table C.4.4
Estimated average scores of 15-year-old students, combined reading scale, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Canada and provinces, 2000 and 2009
Combined reading scale PISA 2000 PISA 2009
estimated
average
score
standard error 95% confidence interval estimated
average
score
standard error 95% confidence interval
Canada 534 1.6 531 to 537 524 5.2 514 to 534
Newfoundland and Labrador 517 2.8 511 to 522 506 6.1 494 to 518
Prince Edward Island 517 2.4 513 to 522 486* 5.5 475 to 496
Nova Scotia 521 2.3 517 to 526 516 5.6 505 to 527
New Brunswick 501 1.8 498 to 505 499 5.5 488 to 510
Quebec 536 3.0 530 to 542 522* 5.8 510 to 533
Ontario 533 3.3 527 to 540 531 5.8 519 to 542
Manitoba 529 3.5 523 to 536 495* 6.1 483 to 507
Saskatchewan 529 2.7 524 to 534 504* 6.0 492 to 516
Alberta 550 3.3 544 to 557 533* 6.8 520 to 546
British Columbia 538 2.9 532 to 544 525 6.5 512 to 537
* The difference between the PISA 2000 and PISA 2009 estimated average scores is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Notes: The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) reports on reading, mathematics and science every three years, providing a more detailed look at each domain in the years when it is a major focus: reading in 2000 and 2009, mathematics in 2003, and science in 2006.
The confidence interval represents the range within which the score for the population is likely to fall, with 95% probability. It is calculated as a range of plus or minus about two standard errors around the estimated average score. The difference between estimated average scores are statistically significant if the confidence intervals do not overlap. When confidence intervals overlapped slightly, an additional t-test was conducted to confirm statistical difference.
Performance differences should be interpreted with caution. It is not possible to determine the extent to which observed differences are indicative of longer-term changes.
The 2009 standard errors and confidence intervals include linking errors associated with the uncertainty that results from making comparisons with PISA 2000. To compare the performance of Canada or of provinces in a particular assessment year with that of other countries, economies or provinces, the PISA Canada report for that year should be consulted.
For a brief description of this indicator, including the methodology, please see the Handbook for the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program.
Sources: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Statistics Canada, and Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, 2010, Measuring Up: Canadian Results of the OECD PISA Study: The Performance of Canda's Youth in Reading, Mathematics and Science, 2009 First Results for Canadians Aged 15, Statistics Canada Catalogue no.81-590-XIE;
Statistics Canada, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics, special tabulation for standard errors, January 2011.
Updated April 29, 2011.
Report a problem on this page

Is something not working? Is there information outdated? Can't find what you're looking for?

Please contact us and let us know how we can help you.

Privacy notice

Date modified: