Fact sheet
Community of Saint-Hyacinthe (CA), Quebec
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census AgglomerationNote 1 of Saint-Hyacinthe was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Saint-Hyacinthe, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Residents of Saint-Hyacinthe anticipated winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (94%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (88%), heat waves (65%) and a contamination or shortage of water or food (63%) to be the most likely emergency-type events to occur within their community.
- Residents anticipated turning to the police as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with rioting or civil unrest (63%), an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (63%) or an industrial or transportation accident (31%) (Table 1.1). In the event of a contamination or shortage of water or food (55%) or a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (31%) residents anticipated turning to their local government first for help and information. Hospitals, clinics, doctors and other medical professionals (68%) were the most commonly anticipated sources of initial help and information in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease. In the event of an extended power outage, utility companies (60%) were most commonly anticipated to be the first source of help and information for people in Saint-Hyacinthe.
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Three-quarters (75%) of residents of the community of Saint-Hyacinthe had personally experienced a major emergency or disaster within Canada in a community where they were living at the time. For most (83%), the emergencies were severe enough to disrupt their regular daily activities.
- Winter storms including blizzards and ice storms were the most common type of emergency or disaster experienced by residents in Saint-Hyacinthe (96%). Extended power outages were the second most common emergency, but they were only experienced by 5%Note E: Use with caution of those faced with a major emergency.
- Missing work or school (73%), the inability to use electrical appliances (69%) and missing appointments or planned activities (58%) were among some of the disruptions experienced by residents who were affected by a major emergency or disaster. More than half of those affected by major emergencies had to evacuate their homes (56%) and about a quarter were unable to use roads or transportation within their community (24%).
- Nearly a quarter (22%) of residents were able to resume their daily activities within one week or less of the event. The majority (75%) of people affected needed a week to two months to recover; 8%Note E: Use with caution needed one to less than two weeks, 31% needed two to less than four weeks and 36% needed one to two months.
- Many (82%) residents received help either during or immediately following the emergency. Family members (48%) and provincial (19%) and local (18%Note E: Use with caution) governments were among the most common sources of assistance.
- Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the residents of Saint-Hyacinthe who experienced major emergencies or disasters that were significant enough to have resulted in severe disruptions to their regular daily routines also endured a loss of property or another financial impact. One in ten (10%Note E: Use with caution) reported long-term emotional or psychological consequences as a result of the major emergency that they experienced.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- About two-thirds (64%) of the people in Saint-Hyacinthe lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 6 with more than one-third (36%) living in a household with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). One in ten (10%) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- More than half (58%) of residents lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency, with about one-quarter (27%) living in a household with three or four such measures. About one in seven (14%) people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- Most (98%) residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector (Table 1.3). Seven in ten (71%) residents reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher and more than one-third (37%) stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their home. About three in ten (29%) people reported that they had all three fire safety measures within their households.Note 8
- The number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents of Saint-Hyacinthe did not differ significantly from behaviours of Quebec residents overall. However, some differences were observed when they were compared to the behaviours of Canadians in the 10 provinces. For example, residents of Saint-Hyacinthe were less likely to have implemented all four emergency planning activities (12%) and all three fire safety measures (29%) than the general Canadian population (19% and 42%, respectively).Note 9Note 10
- In terms of the types of activities and measures taken in the event of an emergency, residents of Saint-Hyacinthe were less likely to have an emergency exit plan (40%), for example, than the general Canadian population (60%), but they were more likely to have a back-up generator (28% versus 23%).
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Less than half (45%) of the residents of Saint-Hyacinthe had a strong sense of belongingNote 11 to their community.
- Three-quarters (75%) of residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 12 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (84%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.Note 13
- About half of residents had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for emotional support (54%), if physically injured (52%) or in case of a home evacuation (46%). However, only 17% of residents had such a large network of support if financial help was needed, and one in ten (10%) reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.Note 14
- Generally, engagement in social and political activities by residents of Saint-Hyacinthe did not have an impact on their level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
Local government | 31 |
Police/law enforcement | 28 |
Family | 14 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 60 |
Local government | 15Note E: Use with caution |
Family | 9Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 68 |
911 | 9Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 6Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
Police/law enforcement | 31 |
Local government | 24 |
911 | 22 |
Contamination or shortage of water or food | |
Local government | 55 |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 9Note E: Use with caution |
Provincial government | 7Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
Police/law enforcement | 63 |
911 | 18Note E: Use with caution |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 63 |
911 | 19Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 8Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution Note: Respondents who perceived their community was at risk for any form of emergency or disaster were then asked where they would turn to first for information or assistance in the event of the perceived emergency or disaster. Respondents could provide more than one response. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Saint-Hyacinthe | Quebec | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 10 | 10 | 8 |
1 activity | 22Table 1.2, Note ** | 22 | 17 |
2 activities | 28 | 26 | 25 |
3 activities | 24 | 26 | 27 |
4 activities | 12Table 1.2, Note ** | 14 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 14 | 17 | 16 |
1 measure | 25 | 29 | 27 |
2 measures | 31 | 28 | 28 |
3 measures | 18 | 17 | 20 |
4 measures | 9Note E: Use with caution | 8 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1Table 1.2, Note 2Table 1.2, Note 3 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1 |
1 measure | 19Table 1.2, Note ** | 24 | 14 |
2 measures | 44Table 1.2, Note ** | 42 | 38 |
3 measures | 29Table 1.2, Note ** | 28 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Saint-Hyacinthe | Quebec | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 40Table 1.3, Note ** | 46 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 39 | 40 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 33 | 34 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 48Table 1.3, Note ** | 51 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 47 | 47 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 44Table 1.3, Note ** | 46 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 46Table 1.3, Note ** | 47 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 70 | 68 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 48Table 1.3, Note ** | 61 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 60 | 58 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 51 | 48 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 28Table 1.3, Note ** | 22 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 41 | 38 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 17 | 20 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 98 | 98 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detectorTable 1.3, Note 6 | 37Table 1.3, Note ** | 34 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 71 | 67 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 37 | 29 | 31 |
No | 37Note E: Use with caution | 26Note E: Use with caution | 35Note E: Use with caution |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 40 | 29 | 32 |
No | 34 | 28 | 31 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 42Note E: Use with caution | 40Note E: Use with caution | 35Note E: Use with caution |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 36 | 26 | 30 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 42 | 35 | 34 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 33 | 21Table 1.4, Note * | 27 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 41 | 35 | 36 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 35 | 23Table 1.4, Note * | 27 |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 42 | 32 | 33 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 34 | 24 | 29 |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: