Fact sheet
Community of Winnipeg (CMA), Manitoba
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census Metropolitan AreaNote 1 of Winnipeg was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Winnipeg, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (95%), floods (73%) and extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (68%) were named by residents of Winnipeg as the most likely events to occur within their community.
- Residents most commonly reported that they would anticipate turning to local government as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with a contamination or shortage of water or food (43%), to their utility company in the event of an extended power outage (42%) or to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (40%) (Table 1.1).
- Residents also anticipated turning to news on the radio if faced with an industrial or transportation accident (29%) or a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (27%). In the event of rioting or civil unrest, residents most commonly anticipated turning to police or law enforcement (25%), while news on the Internet was listed as the most commonly anticipated initial source of information in the event of an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (23%).
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Three in ten (30%) Winnipeg residents have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, more than half (58%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Floods (46%) and winter storms which include blizzards and ice storms (28%) were the most commonly experienced emergency or disaster by residents of Winnipeg.
- The most common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included missing work or school (63%) and missing an appointment or planned activity (54%). More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation in the community (48%), as well as home evacuations (30%Note E: Use with caution).
- Two-thirds (66%) of residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event: 12%Note E: Use with caution within 24 hours, 26%Note E: Use with caution within one to two days, 17%Note E: Use with caution within three to five days and 11%Note E: Use with caution within six to seven days.
- Six in ten (62%) residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event, most commonly from a family member (38%Note E: Use with caution), a neighbour (31%Note E: Use with caution) or a friend (21%Note E: Use with caution).
- More than one-third (35%) of residents of Winnipeg who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact. Long-term emotional or psychological consequences were experienced by 17%Note E: Use with caution of individuals affected by a major emergency or disaster.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Two-thirds (67%) of people residing in Winnipeg lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 6 and nearly half (44%) lived in households with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). More than one in ten (12%) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Four in ten (41%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency, and less than two in ten (15%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. One-quarter (24%) of people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- The vast majority (97%) of residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and three in five (60%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Two out of three (66%) residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. However, less than half (44%) of the residents of Winnipeg stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures within their households.
- On the whole, the number of emergency planning activities and fire safety measures implemented by residents of Winnipeg did not typically differ from residents in Manitoba or Canada’s 10 provinces in general. Differences did, however, exist when considering the number of precautionary measures taken. For instance, Winnipeg residents (2%Note E: Use with caution) were significantly less likely to have implemented all four precautionary measures compared to Manitobans (5%) and Canadians (7%) in general.Note 8
- Differences existed in the types of activities and measures set in place by residents of Winnipeg when compared to Manitoba and Canada overall. For instance, residents in Winnipeg less commonly reported that they had participated in various types of emergency planning activities when compared to residents in Manitoba and Canadians in general. In addition, residents of Winnipeg reported less often that they had an alternate heat source (37%), an alternate water source (37%) or a back-up generator (13%) than Manitobans and Canadians. In contrast, the proportion of residents in Winnipeg with a working carbon monoxide detector (66%) was significantly higher than both Manitoba and Canada in general.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- More than half (55%) of Winnipeg’s residents had a strong sense of belongingNote 9 to their community.
- Most (87%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 10 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, two-thirds (66%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.Note 11
- Many individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for emotional support (63%), for help if physically injured (63%) as well as in case of a home evacuation (59%). About one-quarter of residents had a large support network if financial help was needed (27%). However, 10% reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.
- High levels of sense of belonging and neighbourhood trust, as well as civic engagement, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 27 |
News- Internet | 26 |
News- Television | 26 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 42 |
News- Radio | 14 |
Family | 12Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 40 |
News- Television | 21 |
News- Internet | 18 |
Industrial or transportation accidentTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
News- Radio | 29 |
News- Television | 25 |
News- Internet | 22 |
Contamination or shortage of water or foodTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Local government | 43 |
News- Television | 19 |
News- Radio | 17 |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
News- Internet | 23 |
News- Television | 22 |
Police/law enforcement | 21Note E: Use with caution |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 25 |
News- Television | 23Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 22Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 12Table 1.2, Note *** | 10 | 8 |
1 activity | 19 | 19 | 17 |
2 activities | 23 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 28 | 27 | 27 |
4 activities | 16 | 16 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 24Table 1.2, Note *** | 20 | 16 |
1 measure | 30Table 1.2, Note * | 28 | 27 |
2 measures | 26 | 26 | 28 |
3 measures | 13Table 1.2, Note *** | 18 | 20 |
4 measures | 2Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note *** | 5 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1Table 1.2, Note 2 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1 |
1 measure | 15 | 15 | 14 |
2 measures | 34Table 1.2, Note * | 37 | 38 |
3 measures | 44 | 41 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 64 | 64 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 40Table 1.3, Note ** | 42 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 35Table 1.3, Note * | 39 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 50 | 53 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 40Table 1.3, Note ** | 41 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 64Table 1.3, Note * | 67 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 50 | 50 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 63Table 1.3, Note ** | 65 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 58 | 62 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 49Table 1.3, Note ** | 51 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 37Table 1.3, Note *** | 41 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 13Table 1.3, Note *** | 21 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 37Table 1.3, Note *** | 44 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 19 | 19 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 97 | 97 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 66Table 1.3, Note *** | 60 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 60Table 1.3, Note *** | 63 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 45 | 18 | 44 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note 8 | 40 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 46 |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 46 | 20 | 45 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note 8 | 39 | 11Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 44 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 53 | 20Note E: Use with caution | 53 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 42 | 14 | 42 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 53 | 17 | 48 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 34Table 1.4, Note * | 14Note E: Use with caution | 40 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 51 | 24 | 54 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 43 | 13Table 1.4, Note * | 40Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 46 | 18 | 49 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 44 | 14Note E: Use with caution | 40 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: