Table 5
Perceptions of neighbourhood safety, by sex and self-reported sexual assault victimization, Canada, 2014

Table 5
Perceptions of neighbourhood safety, by sex and self-reported sexual assault victimization, Canada, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Perceptions of safety. The information is grouped by Perceptions of safety (appearing as row headers), Women, Men, Total, Victims and Non-victims, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Perceptions of safety Women Men Total
Victims Non-victimsTable 5 Note  Victims Non-victimsTable 5 Note  Victims Non-victimsTable 5 Note 
percent
Live in a welcoming community
Yes 85Note * 92 89 93 86Note * 92
No 13Note E: Use with caution Note * 6 Note F: too unreliable to be published 5 13Note E: Use with caution Note * 6
Social disorder in the neighbourhoodTable 5 Note 1
One or more big problems 18Note E: Use with caution Note * 8 24Note E: Use with caution Note * 7 19Note * 8
One or more moderate problems but no big problems 18Note E: Use with caution 14 26Note E: Use with caution 14 19 14
One or more small problems but no moderate or big problems 34 29 28Note E: Use with caution 31 33 30
No problems at all 27Note * 45 22Note E: Use with caution Note * 45 26Note * 45
Neighbours would call the police if they witnessed criminal behaviour
Very likely 57 65 49Note E: Use with caution 65 56Note * 65
Somewhat likely 33 25 36Note E: Use with caution 27 34 26
Somewhat unlikely 7Note E: Use with caution 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 3 7Note E: Use with caution 3
Not at all likely Note F: too unreliable to be published 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 3 Note F: too unreliable to be published 3
Crime in the neighbourhood compared to other areas in Canada
Higher 6Note E: Use with caution 4 24Note E: Use with caution Note * 4 9Note E: Use with caution Note * 4
About the same 28Note * 20 26Note E: Use with caution 19 28Note * 19
Lower 65Note * 74 50Note E: Use with caution Note * 74 63Note * 74
Crime in the neighbourhood compared to five years agoTable 5 Note 2
Increased 25Note * 13 27Note E: Use with caution Note * 11 25Note * 12
About the same 65Note * 78 54Note E: Use with caution Note * 77 64Note * 78
Decreased 9Note E: Use with caution 8 Note F: too unreliable to be published 11 10Note E: Use with caution 10
Trust in people in the neighbourhood
Cannot be trusted 16Note E: Use with caution Note * 9 26Note E: Use with caution Note * 8 17Note E: Use with caution Note * 8
Neutral 37Note * 25 28Note E: Use with caution 27 36Note * 26
Can be trusted 47Note * 64 45Note E: Use with caution Note * 64 47Note * 64
Trust in strangers
Cannot be trusted 69 60 61 56 68Note * 58
Neutral 28Note E: Use with caution 28 35Note E: Use with caution 31 29 29
Can be trusted 3Note E: Use with caution Note * 9 Note F: too unreliable to be published 10 3Note E: Use with caution Note * 10
Confidence in the police
A great deal of confidence 29Note * 46 28Note E: Use with caution Note * 44 29Note * 45
Some confidence 50 46 47Note E: Use with caution 46 49 46
Not very much confidence 15Note E: Use with caution Note * 5 Note F: too unreliable to be published 7 15Note E: Use with caution Note * 6
No confidence at all 5Note E: Use with caution Note * 1 Note F: too unreliable to be published 3 7Note E: Use with caution Note * 2
Date modified: