Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
Population Projections for Canada, Provinces and Territories
2005-2031 Section II : Selection of scenarios A population projection scenario is obtained by combining assumptions on how each component of population growth will evolve in the future. Text table 2.1 summarizes the assumptions made for each of the components. When three assumptions on fertility, mortality and international immigration and four assumptions on interprovincial migration are combined, 108 different scenarios can be generated, which is much too large a number for all the scenarios to be relevant and described here. Of this set of 108 combinations, we have chosen six that offer a range of possibilities among the scenarios that generate high and low population growth for the provinces and territories. This choice results from a number of considerations, including:
Text table 2.1
Text table 2.2
The synoptic table describes the six scenarios selected (Text table 2.2 ). Scenarios 1 and 6 combine the low and high assumptions on fertility, mortality and immigration so as to produce respectively the lowest and the highest growth levels at the national level, thus meeting the first of the above selection criteria. The medium interprovincial migration assumption is associated with these two scenarios. The medium assumptions on fertility, mortality and immigration are combined with the four assumptions on interprovincial migration to form scenarios 2 to 5. During the past 30 years, fertility has changed little from one year to the next, while the upward trend in life expectancy is almost linear. Immigration levels have been relatively high since 1990 and the most recent immigration plan of Citizenship and Immigration Canada slightly raises immigration objectives (between 225,000 and 255,000 in 2006) compared to the previous three years. The middle assumption of each of these components is based on this recent past. We thus meet the second and third criteria set out above by associating each of the four interprovincial migration assumptions with the medium assumptions on how the other components will evolve. |
|