Statistics Canada - Statistique Canada
Skip main navigation menuSkip secondary navigation menuHomeFrançaisContact UsHelpSearch the websiteCanada Site
The DailyCanadian StatisticsCommunity ProfilesProducts and servicesHome
CensusCanadian StatisticsCommunity ProfilesProducts and servicesOther links

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Media Room Search The Daily View or print The Daily in PDF format. Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader The Daily archives Latest release from the Labour Force Survey Latest release from the Consumer Price Index Recently released products Latest economic indicators Release dates Get a FREE subscription to The Daily Information about The Daily The Daily
Wednesday, November 12, 2003

Public infrastructure and the performance of the Canadian economy

1961 to 2000

Canada's $157.3 billion in publicly-owned infrastructure - roads, mass transit, water supplies, wastewater treatment facilities and so on - has a tangible impact on the productivity and the economic performance of the Canadian business sector, according to two new studies.

Public infrastructure, or "public capital," lowers the costs of producing a given level of output in virtually every Canadian industry within the business sector, the studies found.

right click the chart to save it.

In doing so, gains in infrastructure have had a modest, but direct, impact on productivity, which represents the output for every unit of labour and capital employed in production.

During the past 40 years, growth in infrastructure has accounted for just under one-fifth, about 18%, of multifactor productivity gains in the business sector, a measure of the efficiency with which inputs are used to produce goods and services.

In the simplest terms, a well-constructed highway allows a truck driver to avoid back roads and to transport goods to market in less time. Hence, public investment in a highway enables private companies to produce their products at a lower total cost. This would permit products to be sold at lower prices, and lower prices can be expected to lead to growth in output.


Note to readers

This release is based on analysis from two new reports. The first, Public Infrastructure in Canada: Where do we stand?, examines the size of Canada's investment in infrastructure, how it has evolved over the last 40 years and how it has contributed to Canada's standards of living.

The second, Public capital and its contribution to the productivity performance of the Canadian business sector, quantifies the contribution of public infrastructure to the performance of the Canadian business sector from 1961 to 2000. It also evaluates the effects of capital investment on the business sector's demand for labour, capital formation and intermediate inputs, estimates the marginal benefits of public capital, and identifies the contribution of public capital and other economic factors to the productivity growth rate in the business sector.

For the purpose of these studies, public infrastructure is defined as the engineering construction capital spending of public administrations - federal, provincial/territorial and municipal. In this context, public infrastructure includes transportation systems, such as subways and highways, mass transit, water supply, and wastewater treatment facilities.


The studies showed that within the business sector as a whole, each $1 increase in net capital stock, or infrastructure, between 1961 and 2000 generated on average about 17 cents of cost-savings each year. The impact varied widely among the 37 industries in the business sector, but each one benefited.

Industries that are the most intensive users of infrastructure incur the biggest savings. For example, a $1 increase in net capital stock during the past four years generated savings of 42 cents for the transportation industry, savings of about 34 cents for the wholesale and retail trade groups, and savings of about 20 cents for the construction industry.

Huge stock of public infrastructure

Canada has a huge stock of public infrastructure. In 2002, it amounted to an estimated $157.3 billion, or about 4% of non-financial capital assets in the economy.

The 2002 estimate was about 17 times the total of just $9.3 billion in 1961, which represented 6.2% of non-financial capital assets in the economy.

Four decades ago, local governments held only 31% of all infrastructure, while the federal government held 24% and the provincial governments, 45%.

In 2002, local governments' share accounted for more than half, while the federal share was down to a modest 6.8%. The share of provincial governments dropped moderately to 40.8%.

In 2000, roads and highways accounted for the largest share of infrastructure for all three levels of government: 69% of the provincial capital assets, 45% among local governments, and 19% for the federal government.

Capital stock of public administrations in Canada
  Total Federal Provincial Local
  $ billion $ billion % $ billion % $ billion %
1961 9.3 2.2 23.9 4.2 45.3 2.9 30.9
1973 29.2 4.4 15.1 14.6 50.1 10.2 34.8
1979 64.4 7.7 12.0 33.2 51.5 23.6 36.6
1988 113.7 10.9 9.6 54.4 47.8 48.5 42.6
2000 155.2 11.2 7.2 65.1 41.9 78.9 50.9
2002 157.3 10.6 6.8 64.3 40.8 82.4 52.4
Note: Net of linear depreciation.

Assets in second place varied widely. Among local governments, it was sanitary sewers, accounting for 17%. For provincial governments, it was bridges (10%), and for the federal government, it was docks, wharves, piers and terminals (13%).

Public infrastructure factor in growth of standard of living

From 1971 to 1979, Canada's standard of living increased 3.02%. However, it slowed down markedly during the following two decades. The growth rate was only 1.9% during the 1980s and 1.5% during the 1990s.

The growth in Canada's standard of living reflects the impact of many factors, two of which are public infrastructure capital productivity and the extent to which public infrastructure capital keeps up with the growth of the Canadian population. These can be measured, respectively, as real gross domestic product per unit of real public infrastructure capital and real public infrastructure capital stock per person.

During the 1990s, public infrastructure per person advanced 0.87%, which was virtually unchanged from the growth rate of the 1980s. This was only about one-half of the 1.7% rate of growth experienced in the 1970s, and reflects the fact that public infrastructure fell short of the population increase.

Contribution of public infrastructure capital to Canada's standards of living
  GDP per person Real GDP per unit of real public infrastructure capital Real public infrastructure capital stock per person
  average annual growth rates (%)
1971 to 2000 2.04 0.93 1.10
1971 to 1979 3.02 1.29 1.71
1979 to 1988 1.90 1.04 0.85
1988 to 2000 1.49 0.61 0.87

During the last three decades, the efficiency with which the Canadian economy has used public infrastructure, or real GDP per unit of real public infrastructure capital, has shown a steady slowdown.

Definitions, data sources and methods: survey number, including related surveys, 1402, 1806 and 2820.

The research papers Public infrastructure in Canada: Where do we stand? (11-624-MIE2003005, free) and Public capital and its contribution to the productivity performance of the Canadian business sector (11F0027MIE2003017, free) are now available online. To access the Analytical Studies Research Paper Series, select Studies from the home page, then, under Browse periodical and series, choose Free and for sale; under Series select Analytical studies.

For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact Tarek M. Harchaoui (613-951-9856; fax: 951-951-3292; harctar@statcan.gc.ca), Micro-Economic Analysis Division.



Home | Search | Contact Us | Français Return to top of page
Date Modified: 2003-11-12 Important Notices