Application forms

For more information on these forms, please visit the Application page and Guidelines page.

The following documentation will be required when submitting an application through the Microdata Access Portal based on the origin of the project:

Documentation Origin of the Project
Federal Provincial/Territorial Municipal Academic Other
Student Non student
  • Canadian citizen
  • Permanent resident
  • Study permit
International researcher not residing in Canada
  • Canadian citizen
  • Permanent resident
  • Work permit
International researcher not residing in Canada
Type of Project Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Name and email of coinvestigator(s) Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Required  
Location of access Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Project proposal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curriculum vitae No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Approval letter as evidence of peer review* Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Approval letter from organization sponsoring the project N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Research Ethics Board approval certificate (biobank) Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A
Letter of Reference from a researcher affiliated with a Canadian University N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A
Letter of Acknowledgment from a Dean of a Canadian University N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A
Fee-for-Service questionnaire N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A
*May be required depending on funding received for the project
Project proposal template

Project proposal template

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: txt, rtf, pdf, doc, docx.

The project proposal is a maximum of ten pages.

  1. Title of the project
  2. Rationale and objectives of the study
    • Clearly identify the specific questions or objectives of the project
    • State how the research will contribute to the knowledge in the field of study by summarizing the current literature and identifying the gap(s) to be addressed
  3. Proposed data analysis and software requirements
    • What is the proposed statistical methodology?
    • Will the volume of descriptive statistics be greater than 35-50 frequencies and crosstabs with limited dimensions? If yes, please explain
    • What software will be utilized?
      • Please note: the approval of a proposal does not imply approval for any software requested or indicated therein. Please check with your local RDC Analyst to determine the availability of particular software packages and to discuss possible alternatives. Please consult the FAQ page.
  4. Data Requirements
    • An explanation of why access to the anonymized microdata files (as opposed to public use microdata files) is necessary
    • Which survey file/files or cycles are to be used?
      • Will datasets be merged, pooled, or linked to other Statistics Canada datasets or other data sets? If you plan to merge, pool, or link data in your analysis please provide adequate detail on how the data from each source will be combined in this analysis, and its intended purpose. In particular, your description should outline whether you plan to pool data from two or more sources to increase your sample size; or to merge aggregate contextual data to the micro-records; or whether your plan is to link micro-record to micro-record together from two or more sources. Please see here for information on record linkage.
    • What are the variables to be used?
    • What is the specific population of interest in the required data set(s)?
      • Is the expected sample size sufficient to complete the analysis as well as respect the confidentiality of the respondents? Please explain.
    • Does geography play a role in the data analysis? If it is based on small levels of geography please describe how it will be defined, what variables will be used and the potential implications this may have on the sample size.
    • Refer to these survey specific guidelines for RDC proposals requesting the following data:
  5. Expected project start and end dates
  6. Expected products
    • Working paper
    • Peer-reviewed journal article
    • Book or book chapter
    • Graduate level thesis or dissertation
    • Commissioned report (e.g. government report)
    • Vetted Statistical output associated with the Statement of Work
  7. References

Record Linkage

Most of Statistics Canada's microdata master files contain unique record IDs associated with respondents such as persons, families or households. To protect the confidentiality of survey respondents, RDC researchers are not permitted to attempt any record linkage either between data files (e.g. Census and CCHS) or among cycles of a survey (such as CCHS 2009 and CCHS 2010).

On occasion, Statistics Canada will consider proposals that require formal record linkage. These proposals require separate approval from senior management. Fees may apply for record linkage services. Please contact your local RDC for more information on record linkage.

Letter of support template

Letter of support template

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: txt, rtf, pdf, doc, docx.

Supervisor Name
Address
Date

Director, Microdata Access Division

Ottawa, ON
To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to you on behalf of [insert student name] who is in the process of submitting a proposal to access the RDC [insert proposal title]. Please find this letter as evidence of my support for this student's application. I have reviewed the proposal and find it suitable for submission to the RDC program.

[Insert Student Name] is prepared to access data in the RDC as they have completed the following courses in analysis, methods and software training:

  • [List examples]

In addition to this, the student has experience with the software packages that will be utilized over the course of the research project:

  • [SAS]
  • [STATA]
  • [SPSS]
  • [List other]

We have also put in place the following supports should the student need any additional resources while working in the centre:

  • [as their supervisor, I will be available to come to the centre to assist with issues that arise and to preview output before vetting]
  • [a statistical consultant is available to assist with software training and methodological procedures]
  • [List other]

As the student's supervisor, I accept responsibility for the needs of my student and welcome recommendations from the RDC analyst as to how the needs of the student can be met.

Sincerely,

Peer review form

Peer review form

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: txt, rtf, pdf, doc, docx.

In order to maintain the trust of Canadians with the use of their personal information and to ensure that all academic research conducted in the Research Data Centres is of scientific merit, a peer review process is required. One aspect is the peer review process that applies to university faculty and students who are not pre-approved and/or do not have funding from an adjudicated funding process.

Principal Investigators for whom this process applies are required to provide confirmation of the scientific merit of their proposed research by having an assessor complete section B of the form below.

Completion of this form by an assessor is a prerequisite for training access to a Research Data Centre (RDC).

Who can be an assessor?

  • A person who holds the rank of tenured Associate Professor or Full Professor at an accredited Canadian university (this would exclude faculty working in teaching only positions).

Instructions

  • Identify an assessor knowledgeable in your area of research willing to review your proposal. It is the responsibility of the applicant and the assessor to avoid conflict of interest as defined and described in the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreement for Review Comitee Members, External Reviewers, and Observers.
  • Complete Part A of the form and ask the assessor to complete Part B (including the signature).
  • Submit completed forms to the Microdata Access Portal (MAP) (Specifications: one file only with a limit of 32 MB; and acceptable formats are: txt, rtf, pdf, doc and docx).
    • It will expedite your application if you can find your own assessor. However, if you cannot please contact info@crdnc.com for assistance.

Part A – to be completed by the applicant (principal investigator)

  • Map ID:
  • Applicant first name, last name:
  • Proposal title:

Part B – to be completed by the assessor

  • Assessor first name, last name: Contact information (phone or email):
  • Position and title:
  • Institution:
  • Subject matter expertise:

In your assessment, please consider the following criteria:

  • The project's objectives are clearly defined;
  • The proposed statistical and analytical methods are suitable for this project;
  • This project will contribute to the advancement of knowledge;
  • The applicant and team members have experience, qualifications and expertise to complete the proposed project.

I have reviewed the research proposal and it is my opinion that the research project has academic merit and that the applicant and team members have the appropriate education and research background to complete it successfully.

  • Signature:
  • Date:
  • Comments (Optional):

For any questions on this form or on this process, please send an email (including your MAP ID) to: statcan.mad-hoou-dam-ssobc.statcan@canada.ca

Letter of reference template

Letter of reference template

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: txt, rtf, pdf, doc, docx.

Director, Microdata Access Division
Ottawa, ON

Date

Dear Director of the Microdata Access Division,

I would like to inform you that (insert name of international researcher and affiliation) has submitted an application for access to Statistics Canada data. I have known (insert name of international researcher) for (number) years and know that he/she is a researcher in good standing at (institution or agency). I confirm that he/she is conducting research in their area of expertise where there is a legitimate requirement to access confidential Canadian data. I am confident he/she will abide by the procedures in place to protect the confidentiality of respondents of Statistics Canada data.

Sincerely,

(Name and address of reference and affiliation)

For Office Use Only - Insert all applicable contract numbers

  • Contract #
  • Contract #
  • Contract #
Letter of acknowledgement template

Letter of acknowledgement template

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: txt, rtf, pdf, doc, docx.

Director, Microdata Access Division
Ottawa, ON

Date

Dear Director of Microdata Access Division,

I am writing to confirm (insert name of international researcher) is registered in Graduate Studies in Department at the University (insert name and country).

I understand that they are applying for access to Statistics Canada confidential data in order to complete a portion of their graduate studies.

I understand that in order to access these data, all researchers agree to follow Statistics Canada procedures to ensure that they do not contravene the Statistics Act.

However, should (insert name of international researcher) not follow these procedures and his/her actions contravene the Statistics Act, I agree to conduct an internal review and address this issue as is appropriate under our university guidelines for dealing with student misconduct.

I understand that a contravention of the Statistics Act will result in the immediate removal of the student's access to Statistics Canada data and may lead to legal and financial penalties outlined in Section 34 of the Act as follows:

Every person who, after taking the oath set out in subsection 6(1), willfully discloses or divulges directly or indirectly to any person not entitled under this Act to receive the same any information obtained by him ....is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both. (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/S-19/FullText.html).

Sincerely,

(Name and address of university official)

Fee-for-Service questionnaire

CRDCN Access and Fee-for-Service Questionnaire

Upload requirements:

  • one file only
  • limit of 32 MB
  • allowed types: pdf.

This information is collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter S-19.

Completion of this questionnaire is a legal requirement under this act.

Introduction

Purpose

This questionnaire collects information on all the sources of funding that you or your co-investigators have received or will receive in support of your proposed Research Data Centre project. This information is being collected in accordance with the Canadian Research Data Centre Network (CRDCN) Access and Fee-for-Service Policy. Completion of this questionnaire by the project's principal investigator is a prerequisite for gaining access to a Research Data Centre.

Your information may also be used by Statistics Canada for other statistical and research purposes.

Security of emails and faxes

Statistics Canada advises you that there could be a risk of disclosure during facsimile or email. However upon receipt, Statistics Canada will provide the guaranteed level of protection afforded all information collected under the authority of the Statistics Act.

Note: Our online questionnaires are secure, and there is no risk of data Interception when responding to Statistics Canada's online questionnaires.

Confidentiality

The Statistics Act protects the confidentiality of information collected by Statistics Canada

Data-sharing agreements

Statistics Canada has entered into data-sharing agreements with provincial and territorial statistical agencies and other government organizations. These agreements require that data be kept confidential and be used only for statistical purposes.

Information on confidentiality, data –sharing agreements and record linkages can be found on the last page of this questionnaire.

Reporting instructions

As you complete the questionnaire, please consult the help guide: for more information on Partner Universities; Core Funders and definitions. Since many researchers hold roles in multiple organizations, the responses to the questionnaire should be based on the capacity in which the researchers are acting for the project.

Please ensure that the acknowledgement at the end of the questionnaire is signed before uploading and submitting the questionnaire.

If you have any questions about the questionnaire, please contact statcan.mad-hoou-dam-ssobc.statcan@canada.ca.

Section A – Introduction

1. Are you and all of your co-investigators either employed by a partner university, professors emeriti of a partner university, post-doctoral fellows pursuing independent inquiry, and/or students working in pursuit of a degree or class project?

  • Yes
  • No

2. Is the proposed research self-directed?

  • Yes
  • No

3. Are you, or are any of your co-investigators, receiving funding or any kind of financial compensation as part of an agreement for the proposed research?

Funding or financial compensation can include any monies paid for conducting the research, including grants, research contracts, student support and/or employment income.

  • Yes
    • Go to question 5
  • No
    • If you answered yes to questions 1 and 2, and no to question 3, go to Section E
    • If you answered no to question 1, yes to question 2, and no to question 3, continue to question 4

4. Before proceeding to the acknowledgement, please indicate all the non-partner institutions whose researchers are represented on the team that will conduct the proposed research.

Go to Section E

5. Have you only received (SSHRC/CIHR/FRQ-S/FRQ-SC/FRQ-NT) funding?

  • Yes
    • Go to Section E
  • No
    • Continue to question 6

Section B – Industry Association and Private Sector Funding

Please complete this section and include all sources of private sector and industry association funding (including grants, research contracts, student support and/or employment income for private sector/industry association researchers).

6. Do you have private sector or industry association funding and/or private sector or industry association co-investigators?

  • Yes
    • Continue to question 7
  • No
    • Go to question 12

7. What are the names of the private sector companies or industry associations providing the funding?

8. Please identify the nature of the funding and complete all relevant questions.

  • Research Grant
    • Continue to question 9
  • Research Contract
    • Go to question 11
  • Employment Income
    • Go to Section E
  • Post-doctoral funding or student funding
    • Go to Section E
  • Other
    • Go to Section E

Specify the nature of the funding

Research Grant

9. Is this grant for research that is "self-directed"?

  • Yes
  • No

10. Are there deliverables associated with the grant?

Some funding that is labeled as a "grant" is defined in the policy as a research contract; this is most often the case when the granter will be applying their branding to a final report. Please familiarize yourself with the definition of a deliverable before responding.

  • Yes - there are deliverables associated with a grant and it may be defined as a contract
    • Continue to question 11
  • No - there are no deliverables to be provided or associated in exchange with or for this grant
    • Go to question 12

Research Contract

11. If there are one or more deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding, please identify them below.

Mark all that apply.

  • Copy of the article for peer-review
  • Oral Report
  • Summary of principal findings
  • Full research report
  • Technical data report
  • Other

Specify all other deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding)

Continue to question 12

Section C – Government Funding

Please complete this section and include all sources of government funding (including grants, research contracts, student support and/or employment income for government researchers) as part of your responses.

12. Do you have other government funding and/or government co-investigators?

  • Yes
    • Continue to question 13
  • No
    • Go to question 22

13. Which governments are funding the proposed research?

Mark all that apply.

  • Federal Government
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Manitoba
  • New Brunswick
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Quebec
  • Saskatchewan
  • Northwest Territories
  • Yukon
  • Nunavut
  • Municipal or other local government

14. Please identify the nature of the funding and complete all relevant questions.

  • Research Grant
    • Continue to question 15
  • Research Contract
    • Go to question 18
  • Employment Income
    • Go to question 20
  • Post-doctoral funding or student funding
  • Other
    • Go to Section E

Specify the nature of the funding

Research Grant

15. Which departments are funding the research grant? Please indicate the name of the grant program, where applicable.

16. Is this grant for research that is "self-directed"?

  • Yes
  • No

17. Are there deliverables associated with the grant?

Some funding that is labeled as a "grant" is defined in the policy as a research contract; this is most often the case when the granter will be applying their branding to a final report. Please familiarize yourself with the definition of a deliverable before responding.

  • Yes - there are deliverables associated with a grant and it may be defined as a contract
    • Continue to question 18
  • No - there are no deliverables to be provided or associated in exchange with or for this grant
    • Go to question 22

Research Contract

18. Which departments are commissioning the research contract?

19. Please identify all deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding.

Mark all that apply.

  • Copy of the article for peer-review
  • Oral Report
  • Summary of principal findings
  • Full research report
  • Technical data report
  • Other

Specify all other deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding)

Continue to question 20

Employment Income

20. For which government departments do you, and/or one or more of your co-investigators listed on the application work?

21. Is this research being undertaken as part of your regular work duties and/or any of your co-investigators' regular work duties?

  • Yes
    • Go to Section E
  • No
    • Continue to question 22

Section D – Nonprofit Funding

Please complete this section and include all sources of nonprofit funding (including grants, research contracts, student support and/or employment income for nonprofit sector researchers) as part of your responses.

22. Do you have nonprofit funding and/or nonprofit sector co-investigators?

  • Yes
    • Continue to question 23
  • No
    • Go to Section E

23. What are the names of the nonprofits providing the funding?

24. Please identify the nature of the funding and complete all relevant questions.

  • Research Grant
    • Continue to question 25
  • Research Contract
    • Go to question 27
  • Employment Income
    • Go to Section E
  • Post-doctoral funding or student funding
    • Go to Section E
  • Other
    • Go to Section E

Specify the nature of the funding

Research Grant

25. Is this grant for research that is "self-directed"?

  • Yes
  • No

26. Are there deliverables associated with the grant?

Some funding that is labeled as a "grant" is defined in the policy as a research contract; this is most often the case when the granter will be applying their branding to a final report. Please familiarize yourself with the definition of a deliverable before responding.

  • Yes - there are deliverables associated with a grant and it may be defined as a contract
  • No - there are no deliverables to be provided or associated in exchange with or for this grant

Research Contract

27. If there are one or more deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding, please identify them below.

Mark all that apply.

  • Copy of the article for peer-review
  • Oral Report
  • Summary of principal findings
  • Full research report
  • Technical data report
  • Other

Specify all other deliverables to be produced in exchange for the research funding)

Section E – Acknowledgement

Thank you for completing the CRDCN Access and Fee-for-Service Policy questionnaire. In signing the acknowledgement below, you are confirming that the information provided is true and that you are aware of your responsibilities to notify the Canadian Research Data Centre Network and Statistics Canada should your funding sources and/or the PI or co-investigators change over the course of your project. Falsifying information on the questionnaire or failing to file an amended questionnaire could result in denial of current or future access to the facilities or data and/or a retroactively imposed fee for service.

The completed and signed questionnaire must be scanned or saved and uploaded in the application of the Microdata Access Portal.

Based on your responses to this questionnaire, the administrators of the CRDCN Access and Fee-for-Service Policy will determine whether your project is subject to a fee for service, and if so, which fee will apply. You will be contacted by email with a confirmation of this assessment within a month of submitting the completed questionnaire.

PI name:

PI email address:

PI Signature:

Date:

For staff use – RDC contract ID:

Thank you for completing this questionnaire.

Please retain a copy for your records.

Visit our website at Research Data Centres.

Date modified: