Table 2
Multivariate-adjusted weight differences among urban and suburban population aged 20 or older living in lower walkability versus "Walker's Paradise" areas, by sex, Ontario, 1996/1997, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2008 combined

Table 2.
Multivariate-adjusted weight differences among urban and suburban population aged 20 or older living in lower walkability versus "Walker's Paradise" areas, by sex, Ontario, 1996/1997, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2008 combined
Table summary
This table displays the results of Multivariate-adjusted weight differences among urban and suburban population aged 20 or older living in lower walkability versus "Walker's Paradise" areas. The information is grouped by Street Smart Walk Score® category (score) and sex (appearing as row headers), Weight difference (kg) and 95% confidence interval (appearing as column headers).
Street Smart Walk Score® category (score) and sex Weight difference (kg) 95% confidence interval
from to
Street Smart Walk Score® less than 10 versus "Walker's Paradise" (90 to 100)  
Total 3.2 2.3 4.1
Men 3.2 1.7 4.6
Women 3.0 1.8 4.2
Very car-dependent (0 to 24) versus "Walker's Paradise" (90 to 100)  
Total 3.0 2.2 3.9
Men 2.8 1.5 4.0
Women 3.0 1.8 4.2
Car-dependent (25 to 49) versus "Walker's Paradise" (90 to 100)  
Total 2.4 1.7 3.2
Men 2.4 1.2 3.5
Women 2.3 1.3 3.2
Somewhat walkable (50 to 69) versus "Walker's Paradise" (90 to 100)  
Total 2.2 1.5 3.0
Men 2.4 1.2 3.4
Women 1.9 0.9 2.9
Notes: Models were adjusted for age, sex, area-based household income, household income adequacy, education, race/ethnicity, immigrant status, marital status, leisure physical activity, sitting most of the day, smoking, stress, alcohol consumption, fruit/vegetable consumption, and survey year. All estimates were weighted by the survey sample weights.
Sources: 1996/1997 National Population Health Survey, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2008 Canadian Community Health Survey (combined).
Date modified: