Fact sheet
Community of Sarnia (CA), Ontario
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census AgglomerationNote 1 of Sarnia was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Sarnia, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (92%), industrial or transportation accidents (92%) and extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (79%) were named by residents of Sarnia as the events most likely to occur in their community.
- Residents most commonly anticipated turning to news on the radio as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (57%), an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (54%), or an industrial or transportation accident (53%). Residents also reported that they would first turn to news on the radio in the event of rioting or civil unrest (46%Note E: Use with caution), a contamination or shortage of water or food (44%), or an extended power outage (38%) (Table 1.1).
- The majority of residents (54%) most commonly anticipated turning to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease.
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Half (50%) of Sarnia residents have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, seven in ten (69%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (52%) were the most commonly experienced emergency or disaster by residents of Sarnia. Past experience with winter storms (including blizzards and ice storms) (31%Note E: Use with caution) and industrial or transportation accidents (12%Note E: Use with caution) were less common.
- The most common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included an inability to use electrical appliances (64%), missing school or work (53%), and an inability to heat or cool the home (51%). A more severe, but less frequent, disruption experienced included an inability to use roads or transportation within the community (27%Note E: Use with caution).
- Approximately nine in ten (88%) residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event; seven in ten (71%) within two days or less.
- About four in ten (42%) residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event, most commonly from neighbours (25%Note E: Use with caution) or family (23%Note E: Use with caution).
- Over one-quarter (28%Note E: Use with caution) of residents of Sarnia who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Just over three-quarters (78%) of people residing in Sarnia lived in a household that was engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 6 with approximately one-half (52%) living in a household with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). A small proportion (5%Note E: Use with caution) of people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Over half (56%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency, but less than one-quarter (23%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. Close to one in ten (9%Note E: Use with caution) people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- The majority (99%) of residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and seven in ten (70%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Over three-quarters (77%) of residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. More than half (56%) of Sarnia residents stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures within their household.
- For the most part, the number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents of Sarnia did not significantly differ from residents of Ontario. When compared to those residing in Canada’s 10 provinces, however, residents of Sarnia were significantly more likely to have engaged in all four emergency planning activities (25% versus 19%) and implemented all three fire safety measures (56% versus 42%).Note 8
- When differences existed in the types of activities and measures set in place by residents of Sarnia compared to Ontarians and Canadians in general, it was often due to Sarnia residents being significantly more likely to have engaged in selected activities or measures. For instance, residents of Sarnia were more likely to have an emergency exit plan, a vehicle emergency supply kit, as well as a wind-up or battery-operated radio than those in Ontario and Canada. The exception, however, was that Sarnia residents were less likely to have an alternate water source than Ontarians and Canadians.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Nearly six in ten (59%) of Sarnia’s residents had a strong sense of belongingNote 9 to their community.
- Most (86%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 10 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (87%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.
- Many individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for help if physically injured (66%), for emotional support (64%) and in the event of a home evacuation (59%). About one-third of residents had a large support network if financial help was needed (32%). However, 14% reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.
- High levels of sense of belonging, self-efficacy, social support and neighbourhood trust were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 57 |
News- Television | 21 |
News- Internet | 17 |
Extended power outagesTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
News- Radio | 38 |
Utility company | 28 |
Family | 12Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 54 |
News- Radio | 34 |
News- Television | 19Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
News- Radio | 53 |
News- Television | 16 |
Police/law enforcement | 15 |
Contamination or shortage of water or foodTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
News- Radio | 44 |
Local government | 15Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 15Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
News- Radio | 54 |
Police/law enforcement | 26 |
News- Television | 22 |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
News- Radio | 46Note E: Use with caution |
Police/law enforcement | 26Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 18Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Sarnia | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 5Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 8 | 8 |
1 activity | 14 | 16 | 17 |
2 activities | 26 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 27 | 28 | 27 |
4 activities | 25Table 1.2, Note ** | 21 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 9Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note *** | 15 | 16 |
1 measure | 31 | 28 | 27 |
2 measures | 33 | 29 | 28 |
3 measures | 17 | 20 | 20 |
4 measures | 6Note E: Use with caution | 6 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1 |
1 measure | 7Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 7 | 14 |
2 measures | 34 | 35 | 38 |
3 measures | 56Table 1.2, Note ** | 53 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Sarnia | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 70Table 1.3, Note *** | 63 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 45 | 47 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 37 | 30 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 60 | 57 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 47 | 47 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 69Table 1.3, Note *** | 62 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 59Table 1.3, Note ** | 56 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 73 | 71 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 67 | 61 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 71Table 1.3, Note *** | 59 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 45 | 46 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 24 | 20 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 37Table 1.3, Note *** | 44 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 25 | 22 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 99 | 99 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 77Table 1.3, Note ** | 80 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 70 | 64 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 54 | 24 | 59 |
No | 45Note E: Use with caution | 24Note E: Use with caution | 55 |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 55 | 27 | 63 |
No | 48 | 19Note E: Use with caution | 52 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note † | 66 | 25Note E: Use with caution | 62 |
No | 48Table 1.4, Note * | 23 | 53 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 59 | 28 | 59 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note 8 | 44Table 1.4, Note * | 16Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 50 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 56 | 35 | 61 |
No | 52 | 14Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 51 |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 58 | 29 | 63 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 48 | 16Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 48Table 1.4, Note * |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: