Fact sheet
Community of North Bay (CA), Ontario
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census AgglomerationNote 1 of North Bay was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of North Bay, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (97%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (80%), industrial or transportation accidents (71%) and wildfires (70%) were named by North Bay residents as the events most likely to occur within their community.
- Residents reported most often that they would anticipate first turning to hospitals, clinics, doctors and other medical professionals for help and information in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (67%). In the event of an extended power outage, residents anticipated first turning to their utility company (47%), while an act of terrorism or terrorist threat, as well as rioting or civil unrest, would lead them to first turn to police and law enforcement (36% and 33%Note E: Use with caution, respectively) (Table 1.1). In the event of a contamination or shortage of water or food, residents most commonly anticipated first turning to their local government (29%).
- Residents also reported that they would anticipate turning to news on the radio as an initial source for information or assistance if they were faced with a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (35%) or an industrial or transportation accident (26%).
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Half (51%) of North Bay residents have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, and two-thirds (66%) of those reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (65%) were the most commonly experienced emergency or disaster experienced by residents of North Bay, followed by winter storms (including blizzards and ice storms) (21%Note E: Use with caution) and tornadoes (13%Note E: Use with caution).
- The most common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced a major emergency or disaster were an inability to use electrical appliances (77%) or heat or cool their home (68%). More than half (56%) of residents reported missing an appointment or a planned activity and 53% had to boil drinking water or use bottled water for drinking. More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation within the community (21%Note E: Use with caution) or communicate outside of the home (18%Note E: Use with caution), as well as having to evacuate the home (11%Note E: Use with caution).
- The majority (87%) of residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event, and half (51%) of residents were able to resume their activities in under two days.
- More than half (58%) of residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event, and help was received most often from family (33%Note E: Use with caution), neighbours (29%Note E: Use with caution) or friends (18%Note E: Use with caution).
- Nearly one-third (31%) of residents of North Bay who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Four out of five (80%) North Bay residents lived in a household that was engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 6 and over half (56%) lived in a household with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). A small proportion (6%Note E: Use with caution) of people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Nearly two-thirds (64%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency, and one-third (32%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. One in ten (11%Note E: Use with caution) people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- The majority (99.9%) of residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and nine in ten (90%) reported living in a household with a working carbon monoxide detector (Table 1.3). Two-thirds (67%) of residents stated that they had a working fire extinguisher in their household.
- In regards to the number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures put in place, there were some significant differences between residents of North Bay and those in Ontario and Canada’s 10 provinces more broadly. One-quarter (26%) of North Bay residents reported that they had implemented all four emergency planning activities, compared to 19% of Canadians. The proportion (14%Note E: Use with caution) of North Bay residents who had all four precautionary measures in place was double that of Ontario and Canada (6% and 7%, respectively). Additionally, 62% of North Bay residents reported that they had taken all three fire safety measures, compared to 53% of Ontarians and 42% of Canadians.Note 8
- When considering the types of activities and measures set in place, residents of North Bay were often more prepared than residents of Ontario and Canada. For example, the proportion of North Bay residents who had an emergency exit plan (73%), a wind-up or battery-operated radio (70%), a back-up generator (32%) and an alternate water source (54%) was significantly higher than both Ontario and Canada. In addition, the proportion of North Bay residents with a working smoke detector (99.9%) or a working carbon monoxide detector (90%) was significantly higher than both Ontario and Canada.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Just over half (54%) of North Bay’s residents had a strong sense of belongingNote 9 to their community.
- Most (85%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 10 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (88%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.Note 11
- In the event of an emergency or disaster, most individuals had a large network of support with more than five people to turn to in the event of an emergency or disaster: 71% for emotional support, 63% for help if physically injured and 60% in the event of a home evacuation. Three in ten residents had a large support network if financial help was needed (29%). However, 9% reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.
- High levels of sense of belonging and neighbourhood trust, as well as civic engagement, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disasterTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
News- Radio | 35 |
News- Television | 19 |
News- Internet | 18 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 47 |
News- Radio | 21 |
Family | 14Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 67 |
News- Radio | 20Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 19Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
News- Radio | 26 |
News- Television | 22 |
News- Internet | 20 |
Contamination or shortage of water or food | |
Local government | 29 |
News- Radio | 26Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 20Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
Police/law enforcement | 36 |
News- Radio | 25Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 16Note E: Use with caution |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 33Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | North Bay | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 6Note E: Use with caution | 8 | 8 |
1 activity | 13Note E: Use with caution | 16 | 17 |
2 activities | 24 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 30 | 28 | 27 |
4 activities | 26Table 1.2, Note ** | 21 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 11Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 15 | 16 |
1 measure | 22 | 28 | 27 |
2 measures | 32 | 29 | 28 |
3 measures | 18 | 20 | 20 |
4 measures | 14Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note *** | 6 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1 |
1 measure | 4Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note *** | 7 | 14 |
2 measures | 32 | 35 | 38 |
3 measures | 62Table 1.2, Note *** | 53 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | North Bay | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 73Table 1.3, Note *** | 63 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 54Table 1.3, Note ** | 47 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 38 | 30 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 56 | 57 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 54Table 1.3, Note * | 47 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 71Table 1.3, Note ** | 62 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 53 | 56 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 75 | 71 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 69 | 61 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 70Table 1.3, Note *** | 59 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 44 | 46 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 32Table 1.3, Note *** | 20 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 54Table 1.3, Note *** | 44 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 20 | 22 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 100Table 1.3, Note *** | 99 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 90Table 1.3, Note *** | 80 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 67 | 64 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 56 | 36 | 63 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 44Note E: Use with caution | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 57 |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 59 | 40 | 64 |
No | 44 | 17Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 58 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 61 | 42 | 63 |
No | 53 | 29 | 60 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 63 | 36 | 61 |
No | 47Table 1.4, Note * | 28Note E: Use with caution | 61 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 66 | 38 | 68 |
No | 46Table 1.4, Note * | 27 | 55 |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 58 | 35 | 62 |
No | 53 | 28Note E: Use with caution | 59 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: