Fact sheet
Community of Kawartha Lakes (CA), Ontario
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census AgglomerationNote 1 of Kawartha Lakes was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Kawartha Lakes, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Residents of Kawartha Lakes anticipated winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (96%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (83%), heat waves (52%) and tornadoes (50%) to be the most likely emergency-type events to occur within their community.
- Residents of Kawartha Lakes most commonly anticipated turning to news on the radio as an initial source of help and information in the event of a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (33%) or an industrial or transportation accident (30%Note E: Use with caution) (Table 1.1). Residents most commonly anticipated turning to police or law enforcement if they were faced with rioting or civil unrest (66%Note E: Use with caution) or an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (58%). In the event of an extended power outage, utility companies (55%) were most commonly anticipated to be the first source of help and information, and hospitals, clinics, doctors or other medical professionals (58%) were the most commonly anticipated sources of initial help and information in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease. Residents of Kawartha Lakes anticipated turning to their local government (29%Note E: Use with caution) as an initial source of help and information in the event of a contamination or shortage of water or food.
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Approximately four out of ten (43%) residents of Kawartha Lakes had personally experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada within a community where they were living at the time. Three-quarters (74%) of these people had experienced emergencies that were severe enough to disrupt their regular daily activities.
- Extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer were named by residents as the most common type of major emergency or disaster they had experienced (74%), followed by winter storms (including blizzards and ice storms) (15%Note E: Use with caution).
- As a result of experiencing the emergencies and disasters, residents most often needed to boil drinking water or had to drink bottled water (80%), were unable to use electrical appliances (75%), were unable to use water at home for routine tasks (61%), or were unable to heat or cool their home (57%). More serious disruptions such as home evacuations or the inability to use roads or transportation within the community were not as common, each experienced by one in six residents (17%Note E: Use with caution each).
- Most (90%) emergency or disaster victims were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event; three in five (60%) were able to resume daily activities in two days or less.
- About two in five (43%) residents who were affected by major emergencies or disasters received help either during or immediately following the event, most commonly from neighbours (38%Note E: Use with caution), family members (36%Note E: Use with caution) and friends (27%Note E: Use with caution).
- Approximately one-third (35%) of the residents of Kawartha Lakes who had experienced major emergencies or disasters endured a loss of property or another financial impact as a result.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- About three-quarters (77%) of people in Kawartha Lakes lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activitiesNote 6 (Table 1.2). Half (51%) lived in a household with three or four such activities. About one in ten (9%Note E: Use with caution) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Similarly, most (78%) residents lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency. Half (51%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. A small proportion (6%Note E: Use with caution) of residents lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- Nearly all (99.7%) residents of Kawartha Lakes reported living in a household with a working smoke detector (Table 1.3). The majority (82%) stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their home and approximately three-quarters (77%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher. Two out of three (65%) people stated that they had all three fire safety measures within their households.
- Residents of Kawartha Lakes differed significantly from the behaviours of residents of Ontario and Canadians residing in the 10 provinces in general, in terms of both the number of fire safety and precautionary measures taken and the types of activities that residents were involved in. For example, residents of Kawartha Lakes were significantly more likely to have all four precautionary measures (25%) and all three fire safety measures (65%) within their homes compared to both Ontario residents (6% and 53%, respectively) and Canadians overall (7% and 42%, respectively).Note 8
- In terms of the types of activities and measures that residents were involved in, people in Kawartha Lakes were significantly more likely to have an emergency exit plan (71%), a vehicle emergency supply kit (71%), a back-up generator (47%) and a working fire extinguisher within their home (77%) than both residents of Ontario (63%, 62%, 20% and 64%, respectively) and Canada overall (60%, 59%, 23% and 66%, respectively). In terms of other types of activities and measures, where there were significant differences between residents of Kawartha Lakes and Ontario residents or Canadians in general, rates of participation in these activities were generally higher among the residents of Kawartha Lakes.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Half (50%) of residents of Kawartha Lakes had a strong sense of belongingNote 9 to their community.
- Most (94%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 10 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, the majority (82%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.Note 11
- Many residents had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to if physically injured (68%), for emotional support (66%) or in case of a home evacuation (59%). However, about one in four people had a large network of support if financial help was needed (27%), and about one in ten (12%Note E: Use with caution) reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.Note 12
- High levels of sense of belonging, self-efficacy and neighbourhood trust, as well as civic engagement, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 33 |
News- Television | 24 |
News- Internet | 19 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 55 |
News- Radio | 16Note E: Use with caution |
Family | 14Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 58 |
News- Television | 18Note E: Use with caution |
News- Radio | 17Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
News- Radio | 30Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 22Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 18Note E: Use with caution |
Contamination or shortage of water or foodTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Local government | 29Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 17Note E: Use with caution |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 12Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
Police/law enforcement | 58 |
Rioting or civil unrestTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Police/law enforcement | 66Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Kawartha Lakes | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 9Note E: Use with caution | 8 | 8 |
1 activity | 13Note E: Use with caution | 16 | 17 |
2 activities | 26 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 27 | 28 | 27 |
4 activities | 24 | 21 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 6Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note *** | 15 | 16 |
1 measure | 15Table 1.2, Note *** | 28 | 27 |
2 measures | 27 | 29 | 28 |
3 measures | 26Table 1.2, Note *** | 20 | 20 |
4 measures | 25Table 1.2, Note *** | 6 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresNote 1 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1 |
1 measure | 6Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 7 | 14 |
2 measures | 28Table 1.2, Note *** | 35 | 38 |
3 measures | 65Table 1.2, Note *** | 53 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Kawartha Lakes | Ontario | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 71Table 1.3, Note *** | 63 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 55Table 1.3, Note ** | 47 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 33 | 30 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 58 | 57 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 53 | 47 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 71Table 1.3, Note *** | 62 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 48 | 56 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 73 | 71 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 61 | 61 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 71Table 1.3, Note *** | 59 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 60Table 1.3, Note *** | 46 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 47Table 1.3, Note *** | 20 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 71Table 1.3, Note *** | 44 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 26 | 22 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 100Table 1.3, Note *** | 99 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 82Table 1.3, Note ** | 80 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 77Table 1.3, Note *** | 64 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 51 | 53 | 65 |
No | 46Note E: Use with caution | 38Note E: Use with caution | 62 |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 55 | 56 | 68 |
No | 44 | 41Table 1.4, Note * | 59 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 51 | 59 | 69 |
No | 51 | 48 | 64 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 55 | 53 | 73 |
No | 47 | 48 | 58Table 1.4, Note * |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 49 | 55 | 72 |
No | 54 | 46 | 57Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 58 | 55 | 68 |
No | 43Table 1.4, Note * | 46 | 63 |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: