Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba

More information

In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in ‘smaller communities’ of Manitoba was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).^{Note 1}^{Note 2}^{Note 3} This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Manitoba’s smaller communities, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.^{Note 4}

Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster

People living in the smaller communities of Manitoba anticipated winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (95%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (74%) and tornadoes (59%) as the events most likely to occur in their communities.
Residents most commonly anticipated turning to their utility company as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with an extended power outage lasting 24 hours or longer (64%), and to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (62%). Residents anticipated turning to police or law enforcement in the event of rioting or civil unrest (44%^{Note E: Use with caution}) or an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (39%^{Note E: Use with caution}), and to local government if they faced a contamination or shortage of water or food (40%) (Table 1.1).
Residents also stated that they would seek out news on the radio in the event of a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (25%) or an industrial or transportation accident (15%^{Note E: Use with caution}).

Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disaster^{Note 5}

Over one-third (36%) of residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, two-thirds (68%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
Winter storms which include blizzards and ice storms (29%^{Note E: Use with caution}), floods (25%^{Note E: Use with caution}) and extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (23%^{Note E: Use with caution}) were the most commonly experienced emergencies or disasters by residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba.
The most common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included missing work or school (69%) and missing an appointment or planned activity (49%).^{Note 6} More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation in the community (39%), home evacuation (20%^{Note E: Use with caution}) and an inability to communicate outside the household (9%^{Note E: Use with caution}).
Nearly three-quarters (72%) of residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event; one-half (48%^{Note E: Use with caution}) within two days or less.
More than half (57%) of residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event, most commonly from a neighbour (35%^{Note E: Use with caution}) or a family member (23%^{Note E: Use with caution}).
Nearly one-third (31%^{Note E: Use with caution}) of residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact. Long-term emotional or psychological consequences were experienced by 9%^{Note E: Use with caution} of individuals affected by a major emergency or disaster.

Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours

Seven out of ten (69%) people residing in the smaller communities of Manitoba lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,^{Note 7} and four in ten (42%) lived in households with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). Less than one in ten (7%^{Note E: Use with caution}) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
Six in ten (61%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measures^{Note 8} taken in case of an emergency, and more than one-third (36%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. More than one in ten (13%) people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
Most (98%) residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and the majority (69%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Half (49%) of residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. However, less than four in ten (37%) residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures with their households.
There were some significant differences in the number of emergency planning activities and precautionary measures taken by residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba and residents of Manitoba in general. For example, the proportion of residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba reported less often that they had not participated in any emergency planning activities (7%^{Note E: Use with caution}) and had no precautionary measures in place (13%) compared to residents of Manitoba (10% and 20%, respectively). In addition, residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba were significantly more likely to have all four precautionary measures in place (10%^{Note E: Use with caution}) than Manitobans in general (5%)^{Note 9}.
There were some differences in the types of activities and measures set in place by residents of smaller communities in Manitoba when compared to Manitoba and Canada’s 10 provinces in general. In terms of emergency planning activities, the proportion of residents of smaller communities in Manitoba who had a vehicle emergency supply kit (73%) and a designated meeting place for household members (48%) was significantly higher than Manitobans and Canadians in general. Residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba were more likely to have an alternate water source (58%) and a back-up generator (37%) than residents in Manitoba and Canada in general. Residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba were less likely to have a working carbon monoxide detector than those in Manitoba and Canada; however, they were more likely to have a working fire extinguisher when compared to residents of Manitoba.

Social networks and sense of belonging

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of residents of the smaller communities of Manitoba had a strong sense of belonging^{Note 10} to their community.
Most (93%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.^{Note 11} Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (82%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.^{Note 12}
More than two-thirds of individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for help if physically injured (71%), for emotional support (69%), as well as in case of a home evacuation (69%). One-third of residents had a large support network if financial help was needed (33%). However, 8% reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.
High levels of sense of belonging and neighbourhood trust, as well as civic engagement, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).

Data tables

Table 1.1
Most commonly anticipated sources of initial help and information, by type of emergency or disaster, residents of smaller communities of Manitoba, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Most commonly anticipated sources of initial help and information. The information is grouped by Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster (appearing as row headers), percent (appearing as column headers).
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster	percent
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster^{Table 1.1, Note 1}
News- Radio	25
News- Internet	21
Family	14^{Note E: Use with caution}
Extended power outages
Utility company	64
Family	11^{Note E: Use with caution}
News- Radio	7^{Note E: Use with caution}
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional	62
News- Internet	11^{Note E: Use with caution}
News- Radio	8^{Note E: Use with caution}
Industrial or transportation accident
News- Radio	15^{Note E: Use with caution}
911	15^{Note E: Use with caution}
Police/law enforcement	14^{Note E: Use with caution}
Contamination or shortage of water or food^{Table 1.1, Note 1}
Local government	40
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat
Police/law enforcement	39^{Note E: Use with caution}
Rioting or civil unrest
Police/law enforcement	44^{Note E: Use with caution}
^E use with caution Table 1.1, Note 1. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' were greater than 5% but not above 10% when respondents were asked about their likely sources of initial help and information. Return to Table 1.1, note 1 referrer Note: Respondents who perceived their community was at risk for any form of emergency or disaster were then asked where they would turn to first for information or assistance in the event of the perceived emergency or disaster. Respondents could provide more than one response. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014.

Table 1.2
Number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents, smaller communities of Manitoba, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Number of emergency planning activities. The information is grouped by Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents (appearing as row headers), Smaller communities of Manitoba, Manitoba and Canada, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents	Smaller communities of Manitoba	Manitoba	Canada
	percent
Number of emergency planning activities
None	7^{Note E: Use with caution}^{Table 1.2, Note *}	10	8
1 activity	21	19	17
2 activities	27	25	25
3 activities	25	27	27
4 activities	17	16	19
Number of precautionary measures
None	13^{Table 1.2, Note *}	20	16
1 measure	23	28	27
2 measures	25	26	28
3 measures	26^{Table 1.2, Note ***}	18	20
4 measures	10^{Note E: Use with caution}^{Table 1.2, Note *}	5	7
Number of fire safety measures^{Table 1.2, Note 1}
None	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	1
1 measure	15	15	14
2 measures	42	37	38
3 measures	37	41	42
^E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Table 1.2, Note * significantly different from provincial level estimate (p < 0.05) Return to Table 1.2, note * referrer Table 1.2, Note * significantly different from both provincial and Canada level estimates (p < 0.05) Return to Table 1.2, note * referrer Table 1.2, Note 1. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' were greater than 5% but not above 10% for 'Canada'. Return to Table 1.2, note 1 referrer Note: Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Emergency planning activities include: an emergency exit plan, an emergency supply kit, photocopies/electronic copies of important documents and a list of emergency contact numbers. Precautionary measures include: a battery-operated or wind-up radio, an alternative heat source, a back-up generator and an alternative water source. Fire safety measures include a working smoke detector, a working carbon monoxide detector and a working fire extinguisher. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014.

Table 1.3
Planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures residents engaged in, smaller communities of Manitoba, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Planning activities. The information is grouped by Residents whose households were involved in the following: (appearing as row headers), Smaller communities of Manitoba, Manitoba and Canada, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Residents whose households were involved in the following:	Smaller communities of Manitoba	Manitoba	Canada
Residents whose households were involved in the following:	percent
Emergency planning activities
Emergency exit plan	62	64	60
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 months^{Table 1.3, Note 1}	47	42	46
Designated meeting place for household members^{Table 1.3, Note 2}	48^{Table 1.3, Note ***}	39	33
Contact plan for household members^{Table 1.3, Note 2}	58	53	55
Household emergency supply kit	42	41	47
Vehicle emergency supply kit^{Table 1.3, Note 3}	73^{Table 1.3, Note ***}	67	59
Extra copies of important documents	49	50	53
List of emergency contact numbers	69	65	69
Plan for meeting special health needs^{Table 1.3, Note 4}	69	62	62
Precautionary measures
Wind-up or battery-operated radio	53	51	58
Alternate heat source	48^{Table 1.3, Note *}	41	48
Back-up generator	37^{Table 1.3, Note ***}	21	23
Alternate water source	58^{Table 1.3, Note ***}	44	43
Other^{Table 1.3, Note 5}	18	19	21
Fire safety measures
Working smoke detector	98	97	98
Working carbon monoxide detector	49^{Table 1.3, Note ***}	60	60
Working fire extinguisher	69^{Table 1.3, Note *}	63	66
Table 1.3, Note * significantly different from provincial level estimate (p < 0.05) Return to Table 1.3, note * referrer Table 1.3, Note * significantly different from both provincial and Canada level estimates (p < 0.05) Return to Table 1.3, note * referrer Table 1.3, Note 1. Percentage based only on those indicating that they have an emergency exit plan. Return to Table 1.3, note 1 referrer Table 1.3, Note 2. Excludes Canadians living in single-person households. Return to Table 1.3, note 2 referrer Table 1.3, Note 3. Excludes those who reported that they lived in a household that did not have a vehicle. Return to Table 1.3, note 3 referrer Table 1.3, Note 4. Percentage based only on those indicating that they or someone in their household has special medical needs. Return to Table 1.3, note 4 referrer Table 1.3, Note 5. 'Other precautionary measures' include having an escape/rescue plan for pets, extra supply of fuel, checking and replenishing emergency supplies, and keeping exits clear. Return to Table 1.3, note 5 referrer Note: Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014.

Table 1.4
High or moderately high levels of emergency planning, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents, by social and political involvement, smaller communities of Manitoba, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of High or moderately high levels of emergency planning. The information is grouped by Social and political involvement (appearing as row headers), Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of..., Planning activities, Precautionary measures and Fire safety measures, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Social and political involvement	Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of...
	Planning activities	Precautionary measures	Fire safety measures
	percent
Engagement in political activities^{Table 1.4, Note 1}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	45	39	34
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}	35^{Note E: Use with caution}	28^{Note E: Use with caution}	40^{Note E: Use with caution}
High level of civic engagement^{Table 1.4, Note 2}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	48	37	38
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}	35^Note *	34	33
High level of social support^{Table 1.4, Note 3}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	46	37	40
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}	40	37	37
Strong sense of belonging to community^{Table 1.4, Note 4}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	48	40	41
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}^{Table 1.4, Note 8}	33^{Table 1.4, Note *}	32^{Note E: Use with caution}	31^{Note E: Use with caution}
High neighbourhood trust^{Table 1.4, Note 5}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	45	43	43
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}	40	30^{Table 1.4, Note *}	32
High level of self-efficacy^{Table 1.4, Note 6}
Yes^{Table 1.4, Note †}	48	36	38
No^{Table 1.4, Note 7}	38	38	39
^E use with caution Table 1.4, Note * significantly different from reference category (p < 0.05) Return to Table 1.4, note * referrer Table 1.4, Note † reference category Return to Table 1.4, note † referrer Table 1.4, Note 1. Includes individuals over the age of 17 years who are eligible to vote, and who have participated in or volunteered for political parties or events in the past 12 months, including municipal, provincial, or federal elections, or expressed views on political or social issues through signing a petition, contacting news agencies or politicians, or attended a meeting involving social or community issues. Return to Table 1.4, note 1 referrer Table 1.4, Note 2. Civic engagement measures individuals over the age of 17 years who were involved in a recreational group or organization in the past 12 months, and includes engagement in political activities. A 'high level' is defined as having been involved in at least 4 activities in the past 12 months. Return to Table 1.4, note 2 referrer Table 1.4, Note 3. A 'high level of social support' is defined as having five or more people whom that individual could turn to for help in an emergency if they are physically injured, require emotional support, shelter, and/or financial assistance. Return to Table 1.4, note 3 referrer Table 1.4, Note 4. A 'strong sense of belonging to community' is rating one's own sense of belonging to their community as a 4 or a 5 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents "very weak" and 5 "very strong". Return to Table 1.4, note 4 referrer Table 1.4, Note 5. 'High neighbourhood trust' is rating one's own trust in the people in one's neighbourhood as 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents "cannot be trusted at all" and 5 represents "can be trusted a lot", as well as having a response of "very likely" when asked about the likelihood of someone in their neighbourhood returning a lost wallet or purse containing two hundred dollars with the money still inside. Return to Table 1.4, note 5 referrer Table 1.4, Note 6. A 'high level of self-efficacy' is derived from having a high self-rating on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for the following three categories: an ability to think clearly and solve day-to-day problems, to handle unexpected and difficult problems, and to figure out what to do if faced with an emergency situation. Return to Table 1.4, note 6 referrer Table 1.4, Note 7. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' were greater than 5% but not above 10% for 'Fire safety measures'. Return to Table 1.4, note 7 referrer Table 1.4, Note 8. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' were greater than 5% but not above 10% for 'Planning activities'. Return to Table 1.4, note 8 referrer Note: Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Households with ‘moderately high’ or ‘high’ levels of emergency planning engaged in 3 or 4 of the following: having an exit plan, an emergency supply kit, extra copies of important documents and an emergency contact list. 'Moderately high' or 'high' levels of precautionary measures include having 3 or 4 of the following: a wind-up or battery operated radio, a back-up generator, an alternate source of heat and additional water. 'Moderately high' or 'high' levels of fire safety measure include having all 3 of the following: a working smoke detector, a working fire extinguisher, and a working carbon monoxide detector. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014.

Notes

^E use with caution

Footnote 1.

A Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) or a Census Agglomeration (CA) is formed by one or more adjacent municipalities centred on a population centre (known as the core). A CMA must have a total population of at least 100,000 of which 50,000 or more must live in the core. A CA must have a core population of at least 10,000. To be included in the CMA or CA, other adjacent municipalities must have a high degree of integration with the core as measured by commuting flows derived from census data.

Return to note 1 referrer

Footnote 2.

The target population for the SEPR included all persons 15 years of age or older, residing in households in Canada’s 10 provinces, excluding full-time residents of institutions (e.g. nursing homes, group homes, hospitals).

Return to note 2 referrer

Footnote 3.

The SEPR covers three types of communities: Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs), Census Agglomerations (CAs) with population greater than 50,000, and ‘smaller communities’ which include CAs with population 50,000 or less and those areas that fall outside of CMAs and CAs. All CMAs and CAs (with population greater than 50,000) were included in the SEPR. A sample of households were selected from smaller communities within each province to represent all households within the province in similar communities. Additional information on the SEPR and its sampling methodology can be found in the ‘Survey description’ section.

Return to note 3 referrer

Footnote 4.

Throughout this fact sheet, responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents.

Return to note 4 referrer

Footnote 5.

This section focuses on personal experiences with emergencies or disasters that happened in Canada, in a community where the person was living at the time, and was significant enough to severely interrupt the individual’s regular daily activities.

Return to note 5 referrer

Footnote 6.

Responses of ‘don't know/not stated’ were greater than 5% but not above 10% when respondents were asked about whether the emergency they experienced caused them to miss an appointment or a planned activity.

Return to note 6 referrer

Footnote 7.

Emergency planning activities include: having an emergency exit plan, a household emergency supply kit, extra copies of important documents and an emergency contact list.

Return to note 7 referrer

Footnote 8.

Precautionary measures include: having a wind-up or battery-operated radio, an alternate heat source such as a non-electric stove or heater or a wood-burning fireplace, a back-up generator and an alternative water source such as a well, tank or litres of stored water.

Return to note 8 referrer

Footnote 9.

Unless otherwise specified, differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Return to note 9 referrer

Footnote 10.

A 'strong sense of belonging to community' is rating one's own sense of belonging to their community as a 4 or a 5 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents "very weak" and 5 "very strong".

Return to note 10 referrer

Footnote 11.

A proportion (9%) of respondents were not asked questions regarding neighbourhood helpfulness in the event of an emergency and as such these cases are not included in the analysis on neighbourhood helpfulness in general or in the event of an emergency.

Return to note 11 referrer

Footnote 12.

Responses of ‘don't know/not stated’ were greater than 5% but not above 10% when respondents were asked about whether their neighbourhood is a place where neighbours would help each other if there is an emergency.

Return to note 12 referrer

Date modified:: 2016-10-13

Language selection

Search and menus

Search

Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba

Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster

Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disaster^{Note 5}

Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours

Social networks and sense of belonging

Data tables

Notes

Fact sheetSmaller communities of Manitoba Fact sheetSmaller communities of Manitoba

Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster

Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5

Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours

Social networks and sense of belonging

Data tables

Notes

Note of appreciation

Standards of service to the public

Copyright

Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Manitoba

Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disaster^{Note 5}