Fact sheet
Community of Grande Prairie (CA), Alberta
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census AgglomerationNote 1 of Grande Prairie was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Grande Prairie, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (93%), industrial or transportation accidents (78%) and wildfires (73%) were named by residents of Grande Prairie as the most likely events to occur within their community.
- Residents most commonly anticipated turning to police or law enforcement as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (43%), rioting or civil unrest (37%Note E: Use with caution) or an industrial or transportation accident (26%) (Table 1.1).
- Residents also stated that they would anticipate turning to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (61%) and to their utility company if they faced an extended power outage lasting 24 hours or longer (47%). They also reported news on the radio as an initial source of help and information in the event of a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (31%) and local government if they faced a contamination or shortage of water or food (29%).
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Over one-quarter (28%) of Grande Prairie residents has faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, more than half (55%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Floods (26%Note E: Use with caution) were the most commonly experienced emergencies or disasters by residents of Grande Prairie.
- Common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included having to boil drinking water or drink bottled water (51%Note E: Use with caution)Note 6 and missing work or school (41%Note E: Use with caution). More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation within the community (43%Note E: Use with caution) and home evacuation (26%Note E: Use with caution).
- Eight in ten (79%) residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event, with more than one-third (37%Note E: Use with caution) resuming their activities within 24 hours.
- More than half (57%) of residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event.Note 7
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Seven in ten (69%) people residing in Grande Prairie lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 8 and four in ten (43%) lived in households with three or four such activities (Table 1.2).
- Nearly half (46%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 9 taken in case of an emergency, and less than one-quarter (22%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. Close to one-quarter (23%) of people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- The vast majority (98%) of residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and two-thirds (65%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Approximately six out of ten (63%) residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. Less than one-half (44%) of residents of Grande Prairie stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures within their households.
- Generally, the number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents of Grande Prairie did not significantly differ from residents in Alberta and Canada’s 10 provinces overall. There were two exceptions: residents of Grande Prairie were more likely to have no precautionary measures in place (23%) and less likely to have three precautionary measures in place (14%Note E: Use with caution) compared to Canadians (16% and 20%, respectively).Note 10
- There were some differences in the types of activities and measures set in place by residents of Grande Prairie when compared to residents of Alberta and Canada in general. For example, Grande Prairie residents were more likely to have a back-up generator (30%) than residents of Alberta (22%) and Canada (23%), but they were less likely to have an alternate heat source (37%, 45% and 48%, respectively). In addition, Grande Prairie residents were more likely to have a vehicle emergency supply kit (71%) but less likely to have a list of emergency contact numbers (61%) or a wind-up or battery-operated radio (50%) compared to Canadians (59%, 69% and 58%, respectively).
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Nearly half (47%) of Grande Prairie’s residents had a strong sense of belongingNote 11 to their community.
- Most (84%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 12 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, the majority (76%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.
- Many individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for emotional support (60%), for help if physically injured (60%) as well as in case of a home evacuation (51%). About one in four (23%) residents had a large support network if financial help was needed. However, 9%Note E: Use with caution reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.
- High levels of self-efficacy and social support, as well as civic engagement and involvement in political activities, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 31 |
News- Internet | 26 |
News- Television | 20 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 47 |
News- Radio | 12Note E: Use with caution |
Local government | 8Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 61 |
News- Radio | 17Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 17Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
Police/law enforcement | 26 |
News- Radio | 25 |
News- Internet | 17Note E: Use with caution |
Contamination or shortage of water or food | |
Local government | 29 |
News- Internet | 21Note E: Use with caution |
News- Radio | 19Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
Police/law enforcement | 43 |
News- Radio | 26Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 21Note E: Use with caution |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 37Note E: Use with caution |
News- Radio | 26Note E: Use with caution |
News- Internet | 26Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution Note: Respondents who perceived their community was at risk for any form of emergency or disaster were then asked where they would turn to first for information or assistance in the event of the perceived emergency or disaster. Respondents could provide more than one response. Responses of 'don't know/not stated' are included in the total for the percentage calculation but are not footnoted when representing 5% or less of respondents. Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Grande Prairie | Alberta | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 8 | 8 |
1 activity | 19 | 17 | 17 |
2 activities | 26 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 24 | 26 | 27 |
4 activities | 19 | 20 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 23Table 1.2, Note ** | 21 | 16 |
1 measure | 29 | 27 | 27 |
2 measures | 24 | 23 | 28 |
3 measures | 14Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 18 | 20 |
4 measures | 8Note E: Use with caution | 6 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1Table 1.2, Note 2Table 1.2, Note 3 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1Note E: Use with caution | 1 |
1 measure | 11Note E: Use with caution | 14 | 14 |
2 measures | 37 | 31 | 38 |
3 measures | 44 | 48 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Grande Prairie | Alberta | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 64 | 63 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 49 | 45 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 52 | 55 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 47 | 43 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 71Table 1.3, Note ** | 69 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 53 | 55 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 61Table 1.3, Note ** | 68 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 58 | 64 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 50Table 1.3, Note ** | 49 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 37Table 1.3, Note *** | 45 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 30Table 1.3, Note *** | 22 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 39 | 41 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 17 | 17 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 98Table 1.3, Note * | 96 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 63 | 65 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 65 | 65 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 51 | 24Note E: Use with caution | 44 |
No | 32Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 20Note E: Use with caution | 42 |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 55 | 29Note E: Use with caution | 46 |
No | 34Table 1.4, Note * | 17Note E: Use with caution | 41 |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 50 | 38Note E: Use with caution | 51 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 42 | 19Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 43 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note † | 47 | 27Note E: Use with caution | 51 |
No | 42 | 19Note E: Use with caution | 39 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note † | 50 | 34Note E: Use with caution | 53 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 41 | 19Note E: Use with caution | 41 |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note † | 54 | 33 | 54 |
No | 34Table 1.4, Note * | 12Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 34Table 1.4, Note * |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: