Fact sheet
Smaller communities of Alberta
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in ‘smaller communities’ of Alberta was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 1Note 2Note 3 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Alberta’s smaller communities, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- People living in the smaller communities of Alberta anticipated winter storms (including blizzards, ice storms and extreme cold) (89%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (72%) and wildfires (64%) as the events most likely to occur in their communities.
- Residents most commonly anticipated turning to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional as an initial source for help and information if they were faced with an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (61%), to their utility company during an extended power outage (57%) and to police or law enforcement in the event of rioting or civil unrest (57%), an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (47%) or an industrial or transportation accident (25%) (Table 1.1).
- Residents also stated that they anticipated seeking out local government in the event of a contamination or shortage of water or food (42%), and news on the radio if they faced a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (29%).
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Nearly one-third (31%) of residents of the smaller communities of Alberta have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, the majority (61%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Floods (36%Note E: Use with caution) and extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (17%Note E: Use with caution) were the most commonly experienced emergencies or disasters by residents of the smaller communities of Alberta.
- Common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included missing work or school (67%), missing an appointment or planned activity (59%) and having to boil drinking water or use bottled water for drinking (45%Note E: Use with caution). More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation in the community (48%) and home evacuation (28%Note E: Use with caution).
- Seven in ten (71%) residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event; one-half (35%Note E: Use with caution) within two days or less.
- More than half (56%) of residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help during or immediately following the event, most commonly from a family member (23%Note E: Use with caution) or local government (23%Note E: Use with caution).Note 6
- Four in ten (39%Note E: Use with caution) residents of the smaller communities of Alberta who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Seven out of ten (70%) people residing in the smaller communities of Alberta lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 7 and approximately one-half (48%) lived in households with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). One in ten (11%Note E: Use with caution) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Approximately six in ten (62%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 8 taken in case of an emergency, and four in ten (40%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. More than one in ten (13%) people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- Most (94%) residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and the majority (73%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Seven in ten (69%) residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. More than half (54%) of residents of the smaller communities of Alberta stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures with their households.
- There were significant differences in the number of fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents of the smaller communities of Alberta compared with residents of Alberta and Canada’s 10 provinces overall. For example, a larger proportion of residents of the smaller communities of Alberta reported that they had three or four precautionary measures in place (28% and 12%, respectively) compared to Albertans (18% and 6%, respectively) and Canadians (20% and 7%, respectively) in general. Residents of the smaller community of Alberta were also significantly more likely to have all three fire safety measures in place (54%) compared to those in Alberta in general and Canada more broadly (48% and 42%, respectively).Note 9
- There were also differences in the types of activities and measures set in place by residents of smaller communities in Alberta when compared to Alberta and Canada overall. For instance, the proportion of residents of smaller communities in Alberta who had a vehicle emergency supply kit (75%), an alternate heat source (57%), a back-up generator (43%), an alternate water source (54%) and a working fire extinguisher (73%) was significantly higher than Albertans and Canadians in general.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- Over half (54%) of residents of the smaller communities of Alberta had a strong sense of belongingNote 10 to their community.
- Most (87%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 11 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (82%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.
- Many individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for help for emotional support (67%), if physically injured (64%), as well as in case of a home evacuation (61%). Three in ten residents had such a large support network if financial help was needed (29%). However, approximately one in ten (12%Note E: Use with caution) reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.Note 12
- High levels of sense of belonging, social support and neighbourhood trust, as well as political and civic engagement, were often associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 29 |
News- Television | 24 |
News- Internet | 17 |
Extended power outagesTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Utility company | 57 |
Local government | 9Note E: Use with caution |
News- Radio | 9Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 61 |
News- Radio | 12Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 11Note E: Use with caution |
Industrial or transportation accidentTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Police/law enforcement | 25 |
News- Radio | 22 |
Local government | 15Note E: Use with caution |
Contamination or shortage of water or foodTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Local government | 42 |
News- Radio | 13Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 10Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
Police/law enforcement | 47 |
News- Radio | 22Note E: Use with caution |
News- Television | 15Note E: Use with caution |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 57 |
News- Radio | 20Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Smaller communities of Alberta | Alberta | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 11Note E: Use with caution | 8 | 8 |
1 activity | 14 | 17 | 17 |
2 activities | 22 | 25 | 25 |
3 activities | 27 | 26 | 27 |
4 activities | 21 | 20 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 13Table 1.2, Note * | 21 | 16 |
1 measure | 22Table 1.2, Note *** | 27 | 27 |
2 measures | 22Table 1.2, Note ** | 23 | 28 |
3 measures | 28Table 1.2, Note *** | 18 | 20 |
4 measures | 12Table 1.2, Note *** | 6 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1Table 1.2, Note 2Table 1.2, Note 3 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1Note E: Use with caution | 1 |
1 measure | 12Note E: Use with caution | 14 | 14 |
2 measures | 28Table 1.2, Note ** | 31 | 38 |
3 measures | 54Table 1.2, Note *** | 48 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Smaller communities of Alberta | Alberta | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 64 | 63 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 51 | 45 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 37 | 33 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 53 | 55 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 46 | 43 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 75Table 1.3, Note *** | 69 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 50 | 55 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 70 | 68 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 68 | 64 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 50Table 1.3, Note ** | 49 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 57Table 1.3, Note *** | 45 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 43Table 1.3, Note *** | 22 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 54Table 1.3, Note *** | 41 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 14Table 1.3, Note ** | 17 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 94 | 96 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detector | 69Table 1.3, Note ** | 65 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 73Table 1.3, Note *** | 65 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 55 | 45 | 58 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 32Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 29Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 43Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 57 | 49 | 66 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 39Table 1.4, Note * | 30Table 1.4, Note * | 42Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note † | 58 | 52 | 56 |
No | 46 | 34Table 1.4, Note * | 51 |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 54 | 47 | 61 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8 | 43 | 34Table 1.4, Note * | 47Table 1.4, Note * |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 58 | 46 | 65 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note 9 | 42Table 1.4, Note * | 36 | 44Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 50 | 40 | 53 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note 9 | 46 | 40 | 54 |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: