Fact sheet
Community of Victoria (CMA), British Columbia
In 2014, information on the emergency preparedness of people living in the Census Metropolitan AreaNote 1 of Victoria was collected through the Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada (SEPR).Note 2 This fact sheet presents information on the risk awareness and level of emergency preparedness of the residents of Victoria, which could help improve the understanding of community resilience in the event of an emergency.Note 3Note 4
Risk awareness and anticipated sources of help in an emergency or disaster
- Earthquakes (93%), extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (69%) and storm surges or tsunamis (67%) were named by residents of Victoria as the events most likely to occur in their community.
- Residents most commonly reported that they would anticipate turning to their utility company in the event of an extended power outage (48%) and to a hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional in the event of an outbreak of a serious or life-threatening disease (47%). If faced with rioting or civil unrest, residents most commonly anticipated turning to police or law enforcement (41%) (Table 1.1).
- Residents most frequently anticipated turning to news on the radio in the event of a weather-related emergency or natural disaster (41%), an act of terrorism or terrorist threat (32%) or an industrial or transportation accident (31%). If they faced a contamination or shortage of water or food, residents anticipated turning to local government first (27%).
Prior lifetime experience with a major emergency or disasterNote 5
- Approximately one-quarter (27%) of Victoria residents have faced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community they were living in at the time of the event, three-quarters (74%) of whom reported experiencing severe disruptions to their daily activities as a result of the event.
- Winter storms (including blizzards and ice storms) (71%) were the most commonly experienced emergency or disaster by residents of Victoria, followed by extended power outages lasting 24 hours or longer (19%Note E: Use with caution).
- The most common types of disruption to daily activities endured by residents who had experienced major emergencies or disasters included missing school or work (78%) and missing an appointment or planned activity (69%). More severe disruptions experienced were an inability to use roads or transportation in the community (66%), home evacuation (22%Note E: Use with caution) and an inability to communicate outside the home (14%Note E: Use with caution).
- Three-quarters (76%) of residents who experienced an emergency or disaster were able to resume their daily activities within one week of the event: 15%Note E: Use with caution within 24 hours, 19%Note E: Use with caution within one to two days, 28%Note E: Use with caution within three to five days and 14%Note E: Use with caution within six to seven days.
- Nearly one-half (47%) of residents who had experienced an emergency or disaster received help or information during or immediately following the event, most commonly from a neighbour (42%Note E: Use with caution) or news media (19%Note E: Use with caution).
- One-quarter (24%Note E: Use with caution) of residents of Victoria who experienced a major emergency or disaster in Canada in a community where they were living at the time of the event and which was significant enough to disrupt their regular daily routine also endured a loss of property or financial impact.
Emergency planning, precautionary and fire safety behaviours
- Three-quarters (77%) of people residing in Victoria lived in households that were engaged in at least two emergency planning activities,Note 6 and over half (54%) lived in households with three or four such activities (Table 1.2). One in twenty (5%Note E: Use with caution) people lived in a household that had not participated in any emergency planning activities.
- Two-thirds (66%) lived in a household with at least two precautionary measuresNote 7 taken in case of an emergency, and over one-third (36%) lived in a household with three or four such measures. One-tenth (9%) of people lived in a household with no precautionary measures in place.
- Almost all (98%) residents reported living in a household with a working smoke detector, and three in four (74%) reported living in a household with a working fire extinguisher (Table 1.3). Nearly one-half (47%) of residents stated that they had a working carbon monoxide detector in their household. Overall, four in ten (38%) residents of Victoria stated that they had implemented all three fire safety measures in their household.
- The number of emergency planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures residents of Victoria engaged in did not generally differ from residents in British Columbia; however, there were some differences when compared to residents of Canada’s 10 provinces overall. For example, Victoria residents were more likely to have participated in all four emergency planning activities (29%) and have all four precautionary measures in place (11%) compared to Canadians in general (19% and 7%, respectively).Note 8
- There were differences in the types of activities and measures in place by residents of Victoria when compared to British Columbia and Canada in general. Furthermore, when significant differences did exist, residents of Victoria were almost always more likely to have engaged in the activity or measure than residents of British Columbia and Canada overall. For example, Victoria residents were more likely to have a wind-up or battery-operated radio (68%), a household emergency supply kit (63%) and an alternate water source (56%) compared to those in British Columbia (59%, 55% and 48%, respectively) and Canada (58%, 47% and 43%, respectively). In addition, residents of Victoria were more likely to have an emergency exit plan (74%), a working fire extinguisher (74%) and an alternate heat source (60%) compared to Canadians in general.
Social networks and sense of belonging
- More than half (54%) of Victoria’s residents had a strong sense of belongingNote 9 to their community.Note 10
- More than eight in ten (84%) residents described the neighbourhood they lived in as a place where neighbours generally help each other.Note 11 Of those who did not describe their neighbourhood this way, most (81%) still described it as a place where neighbours would help each other in an emergency.Note 12
- The majority of individuals had a large network of support in the event of an emergency or disaster, with more than five people to turn to for emotional support (66%), for help if physically injured (63%)Note 13 and in the event of a home evacuation (57%).Note 14 One-quarter (26%) of residents had a large support network if financial help was needed, and one in ten (11%) reported that they had no one to turn to for financial help.Note 15
- High levels of sense of belonging, social support, self-efficacy and neighbourhood trust, as well as civic and political engagement, were sometimes associated with a higher level of emergency preparedness (Table 1.4).
Data tables
Most common sources of initial help and information by type of emergency or disaster | percent |
---|---|
Weather-related emergency or natural disaster | |
News- Radio | 41 |
News- Internet | 17 |
News- Television | 14 |
Extended power outages | |
Utility company | 48 |
News- Radio | 27 |
News- Internet | 7Note E: Use with caution |
Outbreak of serious or life-threatening disease | |
Hospital, clinic, doctor or other medical professional | 47 |
News- Radio | 23 |
News- Television | 22 |
Industrial or transportation accident | |
News- Radio | 31 |
News- Television | 18 |
Police/law enforcement | 17Note E: Use with caution |
Contamination or shortage of water or foodTable 1.1, Note 1 | |
Local government | 27 |
News- Radio | 24 |
News- Television | 16Note E: Use with caution |
Act of terrorism or terrorist threat | |
News- Radio | 32 |
Police/law enforcement | 29 |
News- Television | 24 |
Rioting or civil unrest | |
Police/law enforcement | 41 |
News- Television | 29Note E: Use with caution |
News- Radio | 28Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Number of planning activities, fire safety and precautionary measures taken by residents | Victoria | British Columbia | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Number of emergency planning activities | |||
None | 5Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.2, Note ** | 6 | 8 |
1 activity | 16 | 15 | 17 |
2 activities | 23 | 22 | 25 |
3 activities | 25 | 29 | 27 |
4 activities | 29Table 1.2, Note ** | 25 | 19 |
Number of precautionary measures | |||
None | 9Table 1.2, Note *** | 13 | 16 |
1 measure | 22Table 1.2, Note ** | 24 | 27 |
2 measures | 30 | 27 | 28 |
3 measures | 25Table 1.2, Note ** | 23 | 20 |
4 measures | 11Table 1.2, Note ** | 8 | 7 |
Number of fire safety measuresTable 1.2, Note 1Table 1.2, Note 2Table 1.2, Note 3 | |||
None | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 1Note E: Use with caution | 1 |
1 measure | 12 | 14 | 14 |
2 measures | 39 | 40 | 38 |
3 measures | 38 | 38 | 42 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Residents whose households were involved in the following: | Victoria | British Columbia | Canada |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Emergency planning activities | |||
Emergency exit plan | 74Table 1.3, Note ** | 71 | 60 |
Exit plan has been practised/reviewed in last 12 monthsTable 1.3, Note 1 | 49 | 49 | 46 |
Designated meeting place for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 38 | 38 | 33 |
Contact plan for household membersTable 1.3, Note 2 | 60Table 1.3, Note * | 54 | 55 |
Household emergency supply kit | 63Table 1.3, Note *** | 55 | 47 |
Vehicle emergency supply kitTable 1.3, Note 3 | 58 | 58 | 59 |
Extra copies of important documents | 55 | 55 | 53 |
List of emergency contact numbers | 65 | 68 | 69 |
Plan for meeting special health needsTable 1.3, Note 4 | 67 | 61 | 62 |
Precautionary measures | |||
Wind-up or battery-operated radio | 68Table 1.3, Note *** | 59 | 58 |
Alternate heat source | 60Table 1.3, Note ** | 55 | 48 |
Back-up generator | 19 | 22 | 23 |
Alternate water source | 56Table 1.3, Note *** | 48 | 43 |
OtherTable 1.3, Note 5 | 25 | 21 | 21 |
Fire safety measures | |||
Working smoke detector | 98Table 1.3, Note * | 95 | 98 |
Working carbon monoxide detectorTable 1.3, Note 6Table 1.3, Note 7 | 47Table 1.3, Note ** | 52 | 60 |
Working fire extinguisher | 74Table 1.3, Note ** | 69 | 66 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Social and political involvement | Percentage of residents who had high or moderately high levels of... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Planning activities | Precautionary measures | Fire safety measures | |
percent | |||
Engagement in political activitiesTable 1.4, Note 1 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note † | 54 | 41 | 38 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 8Table 1.4, Note 9 | 46 | 16Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 37Note E: Use with caution |
High level of civic engagementTable 1.4, Note 2 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note † | 59 | 46 | 42 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 41Table 1.4, Note * | 19Note E: Use with cautionTable 1.4, Note * | 31Table 1.4, Note * |
High level of social supportTable 1.4, Note 3 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note † | 59 | 41 | 48 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 10 | 53 | 36 | 36Table 1.4, Note * |
Strong sense of belonging to communityTable 1.4, Note 4 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 7Table 1.4, Note † | 63 | 41 | 40 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 42Table 1.4, Note * | 32 | 37 |
High neighbourhood trustTable 1.4, Note 5 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 10Table 1.4, Note † | 58 | 44 | 41 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 51 | 32Table 1.4, Note * | 38 |
High level of self-efficacyTable 1.4, Note 6 | |||
YesTable 1.4, Note 10Table 1.4, Note † | 57 | 43 | 39 |
NoTable 1.4, Note 7 | 50 | 30Table 1.4, Note * | 39 |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Emergency Preparedness and Resilience in Canada, 2014. |
Notes
E use with caution
- Date modified: