Table 1
Energy-saving lights, 2011

Table 1
Energy-saving lights, 2011
Table summary
This table displays the results of Energy-saving lights At least one type of energy-saving light, Compact fluorescent lights, Fluorescent tubes, Halogen lights and Light emitting diode (LED) lights, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  At least one type of energy-saving lightNote 1 Compact fluorescent lights Fluorescent tubes Halogen lights Light emitting diode (LED) lightsNote 1
percent
Canada 87 76 40 34 9
All CMA households 87 75 39 35 10
St. John's 82 75 31 18Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Halifax 87 74 42 23Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Moncton 69 61 24Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Saint John 82 64 40 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Saguenay 79 68 33 41 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Québec 86 69 45 50 7Note E: Use with caution
Sherbrooke 90 74 38 41 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Trois-Rivières 83 67 29Note E: Use with caution 42 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Montréal 83 67 25 48 7Note E: Use with caution
Ottawa - Gatineau 91 80 35 40 10Note E: Use with caution
Ottawa - Gatineau (Quebec part) 91 80 34 39 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Ottawa - Gatineau (Ontario part) 90 80 35 40 9Note E: Use with caution
Kingston 91 85 44 27 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Peterborough 92 81 55 18Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Oshawa 88 78 37 30 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Toronto 90 81 43 31 10
Hamilton 87 75 41 32 9Note E: Use with caution
St. Catharines-Niagara 87 79 54 25 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo 84 78 41 24 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Brantford 94 83 57 26Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Guelph 95 79 58 31Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
London 90 81 47 31 10Note E: Use with caution
Windsor 84 77 42Note E: Use with caution 25Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Barrie 88 76 48 30Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Greater Sudbury 91 82 54 23Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Thunder Bay 89 85 47 27 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Winnipeg 90 76 51 35 9Note E: Use with caution
Regina 87 77 41Note E: Use with caution 24Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Saskatoon 84 69 47Note E: Use with caution 19Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Calgary 87 75 35 32 11Note E: Use with caution
Edmonton 83 74 40 32 13Note E: Use with caution
Kelowna 85 74 45Note E: Use with caution 49 Note F: too unreliable to be published
Abbotsford-Mission 84 73 43Note E: Use with caution 29Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published
Vancouver 86 74 41 34 11Note E: Use with caution
Victoria 93 79 45 37 18Note E: Use with caution
Non-CMA households 88 78 43 31 9
E use with caution
F too unreliable to be published
Note 1.

Excluding LED holiday lights.

Return to note 1 referrer

Note: As a percentage of all households.
Source: Statistics Canada, Environment Accounts and Statistics Division, Households and the Environment Survey (survey number 3881), 2011.
Date modified: