Table 3a
Perceptions of physical incivility are significantly higher in city central neighbourhoods…

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

  Population aged 15 and over reporting physical incivility
Montréal CMA1 Toronto CMA Vancouver CMA
percentage
Total
17
14
19
Housing Density
High †
26
19
29
Medium
12*
17*
18*
Low
8
11*
13*
Distance from City Centre
Central (less than 5 km) †
38
27
39
Mid-City (5 to 15 km)
20*
17*
13*
Peripheral (15 km or more)
9*
11*
16*
Neighbourhood Type
Predominantly urban (high-density and central) †
41
27
40
Predominantly suburban (low-density and peripheral)
7E*
11*
12E*
Table 3b
… Similarly, social incivility is more commonly reported in central neighbourhoods
  Population aged 15 and over reporting social incivility
Montréal CMA1 Toronto CMA Vancouver CMA
percentage
Total
24
20
26
Housing Density
High †
33
34
40
Medium
19*
21*
25*
Low
14*
15*
17*
Distance from City Centre
Central (less than 5 km) †
40
41
42
Mid-City (5 to 15 km)
28*
21*
22*
Peripheral (15 km or more)
15*
17*
23*
Neighbourhood Type
Predominantly urban (high-density and central) †
43
51
51
Predominantly suburban (low-density and peripheral)
13*
15*
16*
† Reference group.
*Significant difference from reference group at p<0.01
1 Census Metropolitan Area
Note: Do not use these tables to compare between CMAs.
Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2004