Chart 1
Literacy proficiency levels of 25- to 64-year-olds, 2012
1.
Level 0/1 data are not available for Yukon, as they are too unreliable to be published.
Note(s):
Percentages may not add up to 100 as a result of rounding. Literacy was measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 500 and can be reported as the distribution of the population across five proficiency levels from 1 to 5 with an additional category, 'below level 1.' Level 1 corresponds to respondents displaying the lowest level of ability. Levels 4 and 5 were combined to include those with the highest level of ability.
Source(s):
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Statistics Canada, Education Indicators in Canada: An International Perspective, 2014 (Catalogue number81-604-X).
Chart description
The title of the graph is "Literacy proficiency levels of 25- to 64-year-olds, 2012."
This is a bar stacked chart.
The horizontal axis is "%."
The title of series 1 is "Level 0/1."
The title of series 2 is "Level 2."
The title of series 3 is "Level 3."
The title of series 4 is "Level 4/5."
Level 0/1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4/5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nunavut | 52 | 28 | 15 | 4 |
Northwest Territories | 31 | 31 | 27 | 11 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 21 | 36 | 32 | 10 |
Quebec | 20 | 34 | 34 | 12 |
Saskatchewan | 18 | 31 | 39 | 12 |
New Brunswick | 17 | 34 | 37 | 11 |
British Columbia | 17 | 29 | 37 | 16 |
Manitoba | 17 | 31 | 37 | 15 |
Canada | 17 | 32 | 37 | 14 |
OECD | 16 | 34 | 38 | 12 |
Alberta | 16 | 29 | 39 | 16 |
Nova Scotia | 16 | 33 | 36 | 15 |
Ontario | 15 | 32 | 38 | 15 |
Prince Edward island | 14 | 31 | 40 | 15 |
Yukon¹ | F | 26 | 41 | 18 |
1.
Level 0/1 data are not available for Yukon, as they are too unreliable to be published.
Note(s):
Percentages may not add up to 100 as a result of rounding. Literacy was measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 500 and can be reported as the distribution of the population across five proficiency levels from 1 to 5 with an additional category, 'below level 1.' Level 1 corresponds to respondents displaying the lowest level of ability. Levels 4 and 5 were combined to include those with the highest level of ability.
Source(s):
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Statistics Canada, Education Indicators in Canada: An International Perspective, 2014 (81-604-X).
- Date modified: