CVs for operating revenue - Post-production and other motion picture and video industries - 2017

CVs for operating revenue - Post-production and other motion picture and video industries - 2017
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for operating revenue - Post-production and other motion picture and video industries. The information is grouped by Regions (appearing as row headers), CVs for operating revenue, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 0.00
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.00
Prince Edward Island 0.00
Nova Scotia 0.03
New Brunswick 0.00
Quebec 0.00
Ontario 0.01
Manitoba 0.00
Saskatchewan 0.00
Alberta 0.09
British Columbia 0.01
Yukon 0.00
Northwest Territories 0.00

CVs for operating revenue - Accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping and payroll services - 2017

CVs for operating revenue - Accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping and payroll services - 2017
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs fo operating revenue - Accounting. The information is grouped by Regions (appearing as row headers), CVs for operating revenue, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 1.10
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.50
Prince Edward Island 1.58
Nova Scotia 1.79
New Brunswick 2.83
Quebec 3.37
Ontario 1.38
Manitoba 7.23
Saskatchewan 0.88
Alberta 2.85
British Columbia 3.29
Yukon 2.59
Northwest Territories 0.43
Nunavut 0.00

Quarterly Survey of Financial Statements (QSFS): Weighted Asset Response Rate - Q3 2017 to Q3 2018

Weighted Asset Response Rate
Table summary
This table displays the results of Weighted Asset Response Rate. The information is grouped by Release date (appearing as row headers), 2017 Q3 and Q4, and 2018 Q1, Q2 and Q3 calculated using percentage units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Release date 2017 2018
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
percentage
November 22, 2018 83.9 85.2 81.8 78.5 64.7
August 23, 2018 83.9 85.2 80.1 70.9 ..
May 24, 2018 83.9 85.2 69.5 .. ..
February 22, 2018 76.2 71.2 .. .. ..
November 24, 2017 70.0 .. .. .. ..
.. not available for a specific reference period
Source: Quarterly Survey of Financial Statements (2501)

General Terms and Conditions

The following Terms and Conditions arise from Statistics Canada's character as a public institution that must operate transparently and in conformity with the provisions of federal legislation, notably, but not exclusively, the Statistics Act, the Privacy Act, the Access to Information Act and the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada. In addition, Statistics Canada operates transparently and in conformity with its internal management framework, notably, but not exclusively, Statistics Canada's Quality Assurance Framework and Standards of Service to the Public. Statistics Canada's principal objective is to increase the range and depth of statistical information on Canada's population, society and economy available to the Canadian public.

Please note that only Terms and Conditions no. 1 to 12 and 23 to 26 will apply for Custom Requests and Workshops' projects. All of the Terms and Conditions will apply for Statistical Survey and Related Services' projects.


1. General Definitions

In these Terms and Conditions and in the Agreement:

"Agreement" means the Purchase Confirmation or the Letter of Agreement, these Terms and Conditions and any other document specified or referred to as forming part of the Agreements, all as amended by agreement of the parties from time to time.

"Actual Costs" means that the parties acknowledge that because of the nature of the services to be provided, some or all of the costs expressed above are a best estimate only. The final charge shall be determined by the actual costs incurred.

"Fixed Costs" means that the parties acknowledge that because of the nature of the services to be provided, all of the costs expressed above represent the final charge, excluding shipping and taxes.

"Purchase Confirmation" means the Purchase Confirmation provided by Statistics Canada and accepted by the client by the confirmation of its order when the total amount of the transaction is under $20,000 CAN.

"Letter of Agreement" means the Letter of Agreement provided by Statistics Canada and signed by Statistics Canada and the client by the confirmation of its order when the total amount of the transaction is $20,000 CAN and over.

"Custom Requests and Workshops" means a custom-designed product which requires manipulation of existing data and all value added activities related to the product such as access to information agreements and technical support. This also includes various workshops, symposiums, conferences, language trainings, seminars, etc. provided by Statistics Canada.

"Statistical Surveys and Related Services" means a statistical survey which is custom-designed in order to answer specific information needs of one or multiple clients, and the related services. This includes all essential activities to produce a statistical survey such as: the collection of survey data, data processing, compilation, analysis, writing and dissemination. The related services include all services related to statistical survey methods and development such as feasibility studies, questionnaire design, exchange of information with other international organisations, etc.

"Survey Sponsor" means an organization external to Statistics Canada contributing 50% or more of total survey costs for a survey being conducted in the framework of a project.

"Survey Contributor" means an organization external to Statistics Canada contributing less than 50% of total survey costs for a survey being conducted in the framework of a project in order to increase sample sizes in specific domains or add questions to a survey instrument.

"Sponsored Survey" means any survey being conducted in the framework of a project where either a Survey Sponsor or a Survey Contributor, has contributed financially to defraying its cost.

"Information" means any data files, databases, tables, graphs, maps and text for which Statistics Canada is the owner or a licensee of all intellectual property rights and made available to the client in accordance with this Agreement, at cost or no cost, either on the Statistics Canada website or by other means as a result of a contract for goods or services.

2. Interest on Overdue Accounts (non-federal clients)

  1. For the purpose of this section
    1. "Average Rate" means the simple arithmetic mean of the Bank Rates in effect at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time each day during the calendar month immediately before the calendar month in which payment is made;
    2. "Bank Rate" means the rate of interest established from time to time by the Bank of Canada as the minimum rate at which the Bank of Canada makes short term advances to members of the Canadian payments Association;
    3. "Date of payment" means the date of the negotiable instrument drawn by the Receiver General for Canada to pay any amount under the Agreement;
    4. "Due date" means, (i) the defined date to be made in accordance with the Agreement or (ii) where no date has been specified in the terms and conditions under the Agreement, the day that is 30 days after the day on which a date of date for payment is issued.
    5. An amount becomes "overdue" when it is unpaid on the first day following the day on which it is due and payable according to the Agreement.
  2. The client shall pay to Statistics Canada simple interest at the Average Rate plus 3 percent per year on any amount that is overdue, from the date that amount becomes overdue until the day before the date of payment, inclusive. Statistics Canada is not required to provide notice to the client for interest to be payable.
  3. The client shall pay interest in accordance with this section only if the client is responsible for the delay in paying Statistics Canada. The client will not pay interest on overdue advance payments.

3. Pre-payment

  1. Individuals: pre-payment is required for all purchases
  2. Registered legal entities: Statistics Canada reserves the right to apply a pre-payment requirement to all purchases

4. Methods of payment

The following methods of payment are accepted:

  1. Wire transfer and direct deposit (non-federal clients);
  2. BPS (Bill Payment Service – through financial institution) (non-federal clients);
  3. Credit Card (MasterCard, Visa or American Express) (non-federal clients);
  4. Federal Government of Canada Interdepartmental Settlement (federal clients) - Please code the costs for services provided by Statistics Canada related to the collection, dissemination, provision, analysis and access to data in support of policy research and other departmental activities to object code 0362 – Data and database access services, as per the government-wide Chart of Accounts. This also includes the costs of database searches and subscriptions to database services.

5. Currency

All payments shall be made in Canadian dollars. Clients outside Canada pay in Canadian dollars drawn on a Canadian bank or pay in equivalent US dollars, converted at the prevailing daily exchange rate, drawn on a US bank.

6. Credit Verification

All orders that are not prepaid are subject to Statistics Canada's credit verification (non-federal clients).

7. Delivery timeline

Delivery timeline may differ from original agreement and will be confirmed upon receipt of the client's acceptance of this Agreement.

8. Shipping charges

Shipping charges
Shipping Destination Standard Rate
Canada $6.00
USA $6.00
International $15.00

9. Frequency:

Annual = 1, Quarterly = 4, Monthly = 12.

10. Taxes (non-governmental clients)

Canadian clients add either 5% GST and applicable PST or HST (GST Registration No. R121491807).

11. Use of Information

The client's use of the Information shall be governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

12. Privacy Statement

Statistics Canada will only use the client's information to complete the transaction governed by this Agreement, deliver the client's product(s), provide the service(s) ordered, announce product updates and administer the client's account. From time to time, we may also offer the client other Statistics Canada products and services.

If the client does not wish to be contacted again for promotional purposes, the client shall advise his/her Statistics Canada representative.

13. Rights ceded to the Survey Sponsor and the Survey Contributors

The Survey Sponsors and Survey Contributors have the unlimited right to re-disseminate any Information produced in the development, execution and dissemination of a Sponsored Survey, except as otherwise noted in these Terms and Conditions. Use of Information is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

14. Rights reserved to Statistics Canada

Statistics Canada reserves the right to disseminate, in any form, results of any Sponsored Surveys it conducts. This reservation extends to analysis based on results of Sponsored Surveys.

Statistics Canada retains its intellectual property rights to all Information produced in the development, execution and dissemination of a Sponsored Survey, survey feasibility study or survey planning report. Statistics Canada may make any use of such Information as it sees fit.

15. Reciprocal recognition

Statistics Canada and the Survey Sponsor and Survey Contributors undertake to recognize, in significant public communications, each other's contribution to any Sponsored Survey.

16. Data confidential under the Statistics Act

Unless otherwise stipulated in a separate Agreement under data-sharing provisions of the Statistics Act, filled questionnaires, unscreened microdata files and all other information identifying or potentially identifying respondents and their individual information remain the property of Statistics Canada and will not be divulged to the Survey Sponsor or Survey Contributors. In general, no information that is confidential under the provisions of the Statistics Act will be divulged.

17. Public use microdata files

As provided in this Agreement or at its discretion, Statistics Canada may produce a screened microdata file for public distribution from any survey undertaken. Defining and applying the criteria and procedures for screening, approving and disseminating microdata files for public release is the exclusive right of Statistics Canada.

18. Record linkages

Linkages between Sponsored Survey records and other data sources at the level of individual personal records may only be conducted in conformity with Statistics Canada's policies and procedures.

19. Employment of Survey Sponsor's staff

At the discretion of Statistics Canada and subject to its regulations and procedures, employees of the Survey Sponsor and other persons designated by the Survey Sponsor may be employed, as "Deemed Employees" by Statistics Canada, to perform elements of the work described in this Agreement as agreed to with the Survey Sponsor. Employees of the Survey Sponsor requiring access to confidential data will undergo a security clearance and take the oath of office pursuant to section 6 of the Statistics Act, subject to the respondents not having objected to share their information.

20. Public dissemination of survey results

Results of Sponsored Surveys remain protected and may not be disseminated to third parties or the public at large, by either Statistics Canada or the Survey Sponsor, until officially released by Statistics Canada in accordance with the Statistics Canada's policies. The official release date will be established jointly with the Survey Sponsor, but must not unreasonably delay release of finalized results. If agreed to by the Statistics Canada's project manager, Survey Sponsors may involve third parties in quality assurance of survey results or in peer review of analytical text. When the Survey Sponsor or a third party has access to the information prior to official release, an Advance Release Submission has to be established between Statistics Canada and the Survey Sponsor or the third party, as per the Policy on Official Release. Persons under contract to the Survey Sponsor are deemed equivalent to the Survey Sponsor and have the same rights and obligations.

Statistics Canada will consult with the Survey Sponsor in the development of communication materials to be used at the time of official release. If requested by the Survey Sponsor, Statistics Canada will identify the Survey Sponsor as a contact in any public communication at the time of release. Any sharing of survey results with external organizations or individuals prior to official release by Statistics Canada will be done in compliance with the agency’s Policy on Official Release.

21. Data-sharing agreement

Under certain conditions, the Statistics Act allows Statistics Canada to share unscreened survey microdata with any department or municipal or other corporation. This will include the Survey Sponsor and Survey Contributor. Data sharing requires the consent of the individual respondents and a separate agreement between Statistics Canada and the Survey Sponsor or Survey Contributor.

22. Retention of records

Statistics Canada will retain information, files and records in keeping with our official policies and directives.

23. Terminations

Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving 60 days written notice to the other party (in this section, "Termination Period"). Unless otherwise agreed, the terminating party shall compensate the other for any work put in place up to receipt of the notice of termination.

On the final day of the Termination Period, Statistics Canada will calculate and present to the client a report of all costs incurred. The client shall reimburse Statistics Canada for all costs incurred inclusive of the Termination Period.

24. Dispute Resolution

If a dispute arises out of, or in connection with this Agreement, the parties agree to meet to pursue resolution through negotiation or other appropriate dispute resolution process before resorting to litigation.

All information exchanged during this meeting or any subsequent dispute resolution process, shall be regarded as "without prejudice" communication for the purpose of settlement negotiations and shall be treated as confidential by the parties and their representatives, unless otherwise required by law. However, evidence that is independently admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible or non-discoverable by virtue of its use during the dispute resolution process.

25. Amendments

No amendment to this Agreement or waiver of any of the terms and provisions shall be valid unless effected in writing and confirmed by email in the case of a Purchase Confirmation, and unless effected in writing and signed in the case of a Letter of Agreement, by the parties hereto.

26. Entire Agreement

This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the within agreement and supersedes all previous negotiations, communications and other arrangements whether verbal or in writing relating to it unless they are incorporated by reference in this Agreement.

GST: R121491807
Dept.: 054

CVs for operating revenue - Surveying and mapping services - 2017

CVs for operating revenue - Surveying and mapping services - 2017
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 0.01
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.00
Prince Edward Island 0.00
Nova Scotia 0.01
New Brunswick 0.04
Quebec 0.02
Ontario 0.01
Manitoba 0.01
Saskatchewan 0.11
Alberta 0.02
British Columbia 0.01
Yukon 0.00
Northwest Territories 0.00
Nunavut 0.00

Statement outlining results, risks and significant changes in operations, personnel and program

A) Introduction

Statistics Canada's mandate

Statistics Canada ("the agency") is a member of the Innovation, Science and Economic Development portfolio.

Statistics Canada's role is to ensure that Canadians have access to a trusted source of statistics on Canada that meets their highest priority needs.

The agency's mandate derives primarily from the Statistics Act. The Act requires that the agency collects, compiles, analyzes and publishes statistical information on the economic, social, and general conditions of the country and its people. It also requires that Statistics Canada conduct the census of population and the census of agriculture every fifth year, and protects the confidentiality of the information with which it is entrusted.

Statistics Canada also has a mandate to co-ordinate and lead the national statistical system. The agency is considered a leader, among statistical agencies around the world, in co-ordinating statistical activities to reduce duplication and reporting burden.

More information on Statistics Canada's mandate, roles, responsibilities and programs can be found in the 2018-2019 Main Estimates and in the Statistics Canada 2018-2019 Departmental Plan.

The quarterly financial report:

  • should be read in conjunction with the 2018-2019 Main Estimates;
  • has been prepared by management, as required by Section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act, and in the form and manner prescribed by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat;
  • has not been subject to an external audit or review.

Statistics Canada has the authority to collect and spend revenue from other federal government departments and agencies, as well as from external clients, for statistical services and products.

Basis of presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the agency's spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the agency consistent with the Main Estimates for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. This quarterly report has been prepared using a special purpose financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

The agency uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental results reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

B) Highlights of fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date results

This section highlights the significant items that contributed to the net decrease in resources available for the year, as well as actual expenditures for the quarter ended September 30.

Chart 1 Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2018
Description for Chart 1: Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2018, in thousands of dollars

This bar graph shows Statistics Canada's budgetary authorities and expenditures, in thousands of dollars, as of September 30, 2017 and 2018:

  • As at September 30, 2017
    • Net budgetary authorities: $510,694
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $630,694
    • Net expenditures for the period ending September 30: $288,409
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending September 30: $23,786
    • Total expenditures: $312,195
  • As at September 30, 2018
    • Net budgetary authorities: $502,002
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $622,002
    • Net expenditures for the period ending September 30: $270,436
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending September 30: $27,074
    • Total expenditures: $297,510

Chart 1 outlines the gross budgetary authorities, which represent the resources available for use for the year as of September 30.

Significant changes to authorities

Total authorities available for 2018-2019 have decreased by $8.7 million, or 1.4%, from the previous year, from $630.7 million to $622.0 million (Chart 1). This net decrease is mostly the result of the following:

  • A decrease for the 2016 Census of Population program ($37.0 million) and for the 2016 Census of Agriculture program ($2.9 million) due to the cyclical nature of funding that is winding down;
  • A decrease of $26.6 million for the Statistical Survey Operations pay equity settlement;
  • Decrease in the value of the carry forward by $16.1 million;
  • An increase of $42.4 million for new cyclical funding received to cover planning and developmental activities related to the 2021 Census of Population program;
  • An increase of $20.8 million for negotiated salary adjustments;
  • An increase of $10.1 million for two programs; Housing Statistics Framework (Canadian Housing Statistics Program) and Measurement of Growth in International Visitors to Canada.

In addition to the appropriations allocated to the agency through the Main Estimates, Statistics Canada also has vote net authority within Vote 1, which entitles the agency to spend revenues collected from other federal government departments, agencies, and external clients to provide statistical services. Vote netting authority is stable at $120 million in each of the fiscal years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.

Significant changes to expenditures

Year-to-date net expenditures recorded to the end of the second quarter decreased by $18.0 million, or 6.2% from the previous year, from $288.4 million to $270.4 million (See Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object).

Statistics Canada spent approximately 53.9% of its authorities by the end of the second quarter, compared with 56.5% in the same quarter of 2017-2018.

The decrease is also explained by timing differences of payments at this period compared to last fiscal year.

Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the variance of departmental expenditures by standard object between fiscal 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. The variance is calculated for year to date expenditures as at the end of the second quarter. The row headers provide information by standard object. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars and percentage variance for the year to date variation.
Departmental Expenditures Variation by Standard Object: Q2 year-to-date variation between fiscal year 2017-2018 and 2018-2019
$'000 %
Note: Explanations are provided for variances of more than $1 million.
(01) Personnel -20,837 -7.4
(02) Transportation and communications -527 -7.8
(03) Information 355 15.9
(04) Professional and special services 2,287 28.7
(05) Rentals 1,468 18.0
(06) Repair and maintenance 57 52.6
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies -8 -1.8
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works 101 227.0
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 438 12.8
(10) Transfer payments -
(12) Other subsidies and payments 1,981 185.4
Total gross budgetary expenditures -14,685 -4.7
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 3,288 13.8
Total net budgetary expenditures -17,973 -6.2

Personnel: The decrease is mainly the result of the negotiated salary adjustments following the ratification of the collective agreements in 2017-2018.

Professional and special services: The increase is mainly due to the hire of external resources, language training and other external training taken by employees.

Rentals: The increase is mainly due to software licenses renewal and maintenance.

Other subsidies and payments: The increase is mainly due to the non-salary payments related to the Statistical Survey Operations pay equity settlement.

Revenues: The increase is primarily the result of timing differences in the receipt of funds for scheduled key deliverables.

C) Risks and uncertainties

Statistics Canada is currently expending significant effort in modernizing its business processes and tools, in order to maintain its relevance and maximize the value it provides to Canadians. As a foundation piece for some of these efforts, the agency is working in collaboration with Shared Services Canada and Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (Office of the Chief Information Officer) to ensure the agency has access to adequate IT services and support to attain its modernization objectives. Activities and related costs are projected based on various assumptions that can change, depending on the nature and degree of work required to accomplish the initiatives. Risks and uncertainties are being mitigated by the agency's strong financial planning management practices and business architecture.

D) Significant changes to operations, personnel and programs

There were no major changes to the departmental operations during this quarter. Minor changes in program activities with financial implications include:

  • The Census program is ramping down operations from the 2016 Census and is in the planning phase for the 2021 Census. As such, expenditures for this program are significantly lower than other years within the 2016 cycle.
  • Budget 2018 announced funding for new initiatives. Expenditures related to these new initiatives have begun to ramp up and are expected to continue to do so throughout the fiscal year.

Approval by senior officials

Approved by:

Anil Arora, Chief Statistician
Monia Lahaie, Chief Financial Officer
Ottawa, Ontario
Signed on: November 28, 2018

Appendix

Statement of Authorities (unaudited)
Fiscal year 2018-2019
Table summary: This table displays the departmental authorities for the fiscal year 2018-2019. The row headers provide information by type of authority, Vote 105 – Net operating expenditures, Statutory authority and Total Budgetary authorities. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for Total available for use for the year ending March 31; used during the quarter ended September 30; and year to date used at quarter-end for 2018-2019.
  Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2019Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2018 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Tablenote 1

Includes only Authorities available for use and granted by Parliament at quarter-end.

Return to tablenote 1 referrer

Vote 1 — Net operating expenditures 439,173 125,443 239,022
Statutory authority — Contribution to employee benefit plans 62,829 15,707 31,414
Total budgetary authorities 502,002 141,150 270,436
Statement of Authorities (unaudited)
Fiscal year 2017-2018
Table summary: This table displays the departmental authorities for the fiscal year 2017-2018. The row headers provide information by type of authority, Vote 105 – Net operating expenditures, Statutory authority and Total Budgetary authorities. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for Total available for use for the year ending March 31; Used during the quarter ended September 30; and year to date used at quarter-end for 2017-2018.
  Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2018Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Tablenote 1

Includes only Authorities available for use and granted by Parliament at quarter-end.

Return to tablenote 1 referrer

Vote 1 — Net operating expenditures 445,202 149,839 255,663
Statutory authority — Contribution to employee benefit plans 65,492 16,373 32,746
Total budgetary authorities 510,694 166,212 288,409
Departmental budgetary expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Fiscal year 2018-2019
Table summary: This table displays the departmental expenditures by standard object for the fiscal year 2018-2019. The row headers provide information by standard object for expenditures and revenues. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for planned expenditures for the year ending March 31; expended during the quarter ended September 30; and year to date used at quarter-end 2018-2019.
  Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2019 Expended during the quarter ended September 30, 2018 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Expenditures:
(01) Personnel 512,332 131,504 261,104
(02) Transportation and communications 21,375 3,886 6,255
(03) Information 9,281 1,646 2,579
(04) Professional and special services 37,676 5,303 10,244
(05) Rentals 15,280 5,172 9,640
(06) Repair and maintenance 1,604 37 165
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies 3,336 278 466
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works 223 139 146
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 13,463 1,040 3,862
(10) Transfer payments 100 -   -  
(12) Other subsidies and payments 7,332 1,872 3,049
Total gross budgetary expenditures 622,002 150,877 297,510
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 120,000 9,727 27,074
Total revenues netted against expenditures 120,000 9,727 27,074
Total net budgetary expenditures 502,002 141,150 270,436
Departmental budgetary expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Fiscal year 2017-2018
Table summary: This table displays the departmental expenditures by standard object for the fiscal year 2017-2018. The row headers provide information by standard object for expenditures and revenues. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for planned expenditures for the year ending March 31; expended during the quarter ended September 30; and year to date used at quarter-end 2017-2018.
  Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2018 Expended during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Expenditures:
(01) Personnel 482,636 156,013 281,941
(02) Transportation and communications 22,158 3,341 6,782
(03) Information 4,756 1,344 2,224
(04) Professional and special services 43,366 4,716 7,957
(05) Rentals 16,803 4,743 8,172
(06) Repair and maintenance 2,777 54 108
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies 3,832 216 474
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works - 42 45
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 11,160 1,364 3,424
(10) Transfer payments 100 - -
(12) Other subsidies and payments 43,106 947 1,068
Total gross budgetary expenditures 630,694 172,780 312,195
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 120,000 6,568 23,786
Total revenues netted against expenditures 120,000 6,568 23,786
Total net budgetary expenditures 510,694 166,212 288,409

Data quality, concepts and methodology: Explanatory notes on direct program payments to agriculture producers

Payments Enhancing Receipts

Explanatory notes for programs which existed prior to 2007 can be found in the discontinued Direct Payments to Agriculture Producers publication (21-015-X).

Agricultural Revenue Stabilization Account (ARSA) (2000 to 2002)

The objective of the Agricultural Revenue Stabilization Account program was to offer a risk management tool to farming operations in Quebec, based on the operation's gross income. To this effect, the program established two individual funds, for contributions from participants and La Financière agricole du Québec, and made provisions for withdrawals from these funds to compensate for reductions in farm income. The ARSA was a program developed and administered by La Financière agricole du Québec.

Following the introduction of the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Program, La Financière agricole du Québec terminated this program in the 2002 program year. Consequently, participants had five years to make withdrawals from their account, at an annual minimum of 20% of the government contribution held on February 1st, 2005.

AgriInvest (2008 to present)

This program was created under the Growing Forward policy framework (2007 – 2013) and has continued under Growing Forward 2 (2013 – 2018) and the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (effective April 1, 2018). AgriInvest replaces part of the coverage that had been available under the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program, and, operates similar to the former Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) program.

Through government and producer contributions, AgriInvest provides cash flow to help producers manage small income declines, as well as provide support for investments to mitigate risks or improve market income. Producers can deposit up to 100% of their Allowable Net Sales, with the first 1% matched by governments. The limit on matching government contributions is $10,000 per AgriInvest account. AgriInvest is administered by the Federal government in all provinces except Quebec.

Agri-Québec (2011 to present)

Agri-Québec is a self-directed risk management program offered to all farming and aqua-farming operations in Quebec. The program allows participants to deposit an amount in an account under their name, in order to receive matching contributions from La Financière agricole du Québec. Participants can then withdraw the funds from the accounts, based on their operational needs. Agri-Québec is managed jointly by the provincial and federal governments, as it is similar and complimentary to AgriInvest.

Agri-Québec Plus (2015 to present)

The Agri-Québec Plus program offers additional financial assistance to eligible operations. Agri-Québec Plus complements AgriStability by offering a coverage level of 85% of the reference margin rather than 70%. The program covers agriculture products that are not covered or not associated with the ASRA program (Farm Income Stabilization Program) and are not supply-managed. Participation in the program is linked to the respect of environmental requirements.

AgriRecovery (2008 to present)

The AgriRecovery framework is part of a suite of federal-provincial-territorial (FPT) Business Risk Management (BRM) tools under the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (replacing Growing Forward 2, as of 2018).

AgriRecovery was designed to provide quick, targeted assistance to producers in case of natural disasters, with a focus on the extraordinary costs producers must take on to recover from disasters. Federal and provincial governments jointly determine whether further assistance beyond existing programs already in place is necessary, and what form of assistance should be provided. AgriRecovery initiatives are cost-shared on a 60:40 basis between the federal government and participating provinces or territories. The assistance provided will be unique to the specific disaster situation and often unique to a province or region. Examples of programs included in AgriRecovery are the 2017 and 2018 Canada-BC Wildfire Recovery Initiatives, and the 2017 Canada-Quebec Hail Assistance Initiative.

AgriStability (2007 to present)

This program was created under the Growing Forward policy framework (2007 – 2013) and has continued under Growing Forward 2 (2013 – 2018) and the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (effective April 1, 2018). AgriStability was developed as a margin-based program that provides income support when a producer experiences a large margin decline. AgriStability has replaced part of the coverage that had been provided under the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program. Under the current program, a payment is triggered when the production margin falls below 70 percent of the producer's historical reference margin.

AgriStability is delivered in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and Yukon by the Federal government. In British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and Prince Edward Island, AgriStability is delivered provincially.

Assiniboine Valley Producers Flood Assistance Program (2007 to 2011)

This Province of Manitoba program provided financial assistance for Assiniboine Valley agricultural producers who experienced crop loss or the inability to seed a crop in 2005 and 2006 along the Assiniboine River from the Shellmouth Dam to Brandon, due to flooding. This program also provided assistance in 2011, following flooding in 2010.

These programs were managed through the Manitoba Agricultural Service Corporation (MASC).

Beekeepers Financial Assistance Program (2014)

Due to harsh winter conditions in Ontario in 2014, and other pollinator health issues, Ontario's bee colonies experienced higher than normal mortality rates. To help offset these losses, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food provided one-time financial assistance of $105 per hive to beekeepers who have 10 hives or more and lost over 40 per cent of their colonies between Jan. 1, 2014, and Oct. 31, 2014.

Canada-Ontario General Top-Up Program (2005 to 2007)

This was a special top-up payment program which provided whole farm coverage to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program participants in Ontario, who were automatically enrolled. All commodities eligible for CAIS payment were covered under this program. In order to qualify, participants must have experienced a decline in their program year production margin as calculated by the CAIS Program Administrator and be eligible to receive the government portion of the CAIS payment. The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs were responsible for the overall administration of the program.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program (2004 to 2008)

The CAIS program was available to producers across Canada and provided assistance to those producers who had experienced a loss of income as a result of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or other factors. The program integrated stabilization and disaster protection into a single program, helping producers protect their farming operations from both small and large drops in income.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Inventory Transition Initiative (CITI) (2006 to 2007)

CITI was a one-time federal government injection of $900 million into Canada's Agriculture and Agri-food industry. The funds were delivered to producers by recalculating how the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program valued inventory change for the 2003, 2004, and 2005 CAIS program years.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Ontario Inventory Transition Initiative (2006 to present)

The Ontario Inventory Transition Payment was an additional one-time payment from the province of Ontario, for the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program participants, as it transitioned to a new method of valuing inventory for CAIS.

Compensation for animal losses (1981 to present)

Formerly a program under the Animal Disease and Protection Act, this compensation program is now administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in accordance with requirements established under the Health of Animals Act. Producers in all provinces are compensated when farm animals infected with certain contagious diseases are ordered to be slaughtered. Compensation also includes applicable transportation and disposal costs and compensation for animals injured during testing.

Cost of Production Payment (COP) (2007 to 2010)

This program helped non-supply managed commodities producers with the rising cost of production. This federal program was based on producers' net sales for 2000-2004 (or in the case of new producers: payments were based on average net sales for 2005-2006).

Cover Crop Protection Program (CCPP) (2006 to 2008)

The CCPP was a Government of Canada initiative designed to provide financial assistance to agricultural producers who were unable to seed commercial crops as a result of flooding in the spring of 2005 and/or 2006.

Crop Insurance (1981 to present)

Crop Insurance (now referred to as AgriInsurance) is a federal-provincial-producer cost-shared program that stabilizes a producer's income by minimizing the economic effect of production losses caused by natural hazards. AgriInsurance is a provincially delivered program to which the federal government contributes a portion of total premiums and administrative costs. Premiums for most crop insurance programs are cost-shared: 40 per cent by participating producers, 36 per cent by the federal government and 24 per cent by the province, while administrative costs are funded by governments, 60 per cent by the federal government and 40 per cent by the province.

AgriInsurance plans are developed and delivered by each province to meet the needs of the producers in that province. AgriInsurance helps to cover production losses as well as losses from poor product quality. Both yield and non-yield based plans are offered. These plans cover traditional crops such as wheat, corn, oats and barley as well as horticultural crops such as lettuce, strawberries, carrots and eggplants. Some provinces also provide coverage for bee mortality as well as maple syrup production. The provinces constantly work to improve their programs by adjusting existing plans and implementing new ones to meet changing industry requirements.

Crop Loss Compensation (1981 to present)

Crop loss compensation programs are generally one element of a province's Wildlife damage compensation programs, which can also include separate Waterfowl damage and Livestock predation programs. This Big Game program reduces the financial loss incurred by producers in these provinces from wildlife damage to eligible crops, and can include compensation for wildlife excreta contaminated crops and silage in pits and tubes. In some provinces damage to honey producers and leafcutter bee products is also included.

Also see Livestock predation compensation, Waterfowl damage and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Cull Animal Program (2003 to 2006)

This program was intended to assist farmers with the additional cost of feeding surplus animals while the US border was closed to Canadian animals over 30 months of age. With the goal of discouraging on-farm slaughter and encouraging movement of mature animals to domestic markets in an orderly fashion.

Cull Breeding Swine Program (2008)

This federally funded program for 2008, administered by the Canadian Pork Council, was designed to help restructure the industry to bring it in line with market realities. The objective was to reduce the national breeding herd size by up to 10% over and above normal annual reductions. Producers were eligible to receive a per head payment for each animal slaughtered as well as reimbursement for slaughter and disposal costs. Producers had to agree to empty at least one barn, and not restock for a three year period.

Drought Assistance for Livestock Producers (2007 to 2008)

This program was enacted in 2007, to assist livestock owners in Northern B.C. who suffered economic hardship in 2006 due to drought. Drought conditions in the summer of 2006 reduced hay and forage yields by up to 50% and producers were left with higher costs for feed, water and other expenses.

Fed Cattle Set Aside Program (2005 to 2006)

The program was part of a national strategy to assist Canada's cattle industry to reposition itself to help ensure its long-term viability.

Golden Nematode Disaster Program (2007 to 2009)

The objective of this programs was to assist producers affected by Golden Nematode with the costs of disposing potatoes and a per hectare support payment to assist potato producers and producers of nursery and greenhouse crops with extraordinary costs not covered under existing programs. The program was funded by the federal government.

Grains and Oilseeds Payment (GOPP) (2006)

The Grains and Oilseeds Payment Program was a one-time program for producers of grains, oilseeds, or special crops, to help address the severe economic hardships they were facing.

Hog Transition Fund (2008)

This program was designed to assist Nova Scotia hog producers who were having financial difficulties due to declining market prices in 2006-2007. The program was administered through Pork Nova Scotia.

Lake Manitoba Flood Assistance Program (2011 to present)

This program was designed to provide financial compensation to crop and livestock producers affected by the flooding of Lake Manitoba in 2011. Part A - Lake Manitoba Pasture Flooding Assistance Component and Part B - Lake Manitoba Transportation and Crop/Forage Loss Component, are included. This program is funded entirely by the provincial government.

Livestock Insurance Programs (1991 to present)

The Livestock Insurance Programs include a number of provincially administered livestock insurance programs. These programs include:

The Cattle Price Insurance Program (2009 to present), designed to provide Alberta cattle producers with an effective price risk management tool reflective of their risk. As of 2014, this program is now referred to as the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program.

Dairy Livestock Insurance (1991 to present), implemented to assist Nova Scotia producers when a number of cattle were lost due to disease outbreaks. The program continues to exist for situations resulting in a significant loss in production, causing a loss of revenue.

The Hog Price Insurance Program (2011 to present), designed to provide Alberta hog producers with protection against unexpected declines in Alberta hog prices, over a defined period of time. As of 2014, this program is now referred to as the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program.

Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador (1991 to present) compensates producers for the death or injury to sheep, goats, dairy cattle or beef cattle caused by dogs or other predators.

Livestock Insurance in Prince Edward Island (2009 to present) offers two types of coverage: compensation to cattle producers for the death of an animal due to disease, as well as compensation to dairy producers whose production levels fall beneath a set threshold, causing a loss of income.

The Overwinter Bee Mortality Insurance (2012 to present) insures Manitoban beekeepers against unmanageable wintering losses, including weather-related damages, diseases and pests. As of 2014 the data for this program is included in Crop Insurance.

Poultry Insurance (2008 to present) compensates Nova Scotia producers for the loss of poultry (which includes broilers, breeders, breeder pullets, layer pullets, commercial layers and integrated layers) to the disease infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT).

The Western Livestock Price Insurance Program (WLPIP) (2014 to present) enables livestock producers to purchase price protection on cattle and hogs in the form of an insurance policy. It offers protection against an unexpected drop in prices over a defined period of time, and is available to producers in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

Administration costs are covered by the federal and provincial governments through Growing Forward 2. Premiums will be fully funded by producers, but any deficit after four years will be made up by the federal government. The four-province program will be managed by the Alberta Agriculture Financial Services Corp, which ran the pre-existing Cattle and Hog Price Insurance programs in Alberta. Crop insurance entities in Manitoba and Saskatchewan will deliver the WLPIP in those provinces. The Business Risk Management Branch of the British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture delivers the program in that province.

Additional notes on the Livestock Insurance Programs

Producer premiums for the Prince Edward Island Livestock Insurance and Dairy Livestock Insurance in Nova Scotia (as of 2006) are partially subsidized by the provincial and federal governments.

Premiums are not subsidized for the Cattle Price Insurance Program, the Hog Price Insurance Program, Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador, Poultry Insurance program in Nova Scotia, or the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program. However, the costs of administrating the programs are funded by provincial governments and/or Crown Corporations.

Prior to 2005, Dairy Livestock Insurance in Nova Scotia and Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador were reported under Programs funded by the private sector.

Livestock Predation Compensation Program

Manitoba (1999 to present) - This program compensates livestock producers in Manitoba for losses from injury or death of eligible livestock that resulted from losses due to natural predators such as black bear, cougar, wolf or coyote. Compensation is available to 100% of the assessed value of the animal, for a confirmed loss due to predation and to 50% of the value for a probable loss. In respect for livestock injured, the payment will be the lesser of the veterinary treatment or the value of the livestock. The government of Manitoba pays 60% of program payments and the Government of Canada 40%. Administration costs are cost-shared 50/50 between the Government of Canada and the Government of Manitoba.

Saskatchewan (2010 to present) - Under the Wildlife Damage Compensation Program, the Saskatchewan Compensation for Livestock Predation compensates producers for livestock killed or injured by predators. The first 80 percent of the program funding is cost-shared by federal and provincial governments. The provincial government contributes the remaining amount. The program is administered by the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation. Other components of the Wildlife Damage Compensation Program include Waterfowl damage compensation and Crops loss compensation (reported separately).

Also see Crop loss compensation, Waterfowl damage and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Manitoba Ruminant Assistance Program (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008, funded jointly by the province of Manitoba and the federal government, allowed cattle producers to receive a direct payment of up to 3% of historical net sales. The payment, administered by the Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC), was provided to all ruminant producers and was in proportion to the size of the producer's livestock operations.

Manitoba Spring Blizzard Livestock Mortalities Assistance Program (2011 to 2012)

The 2011 Manitoba Spring Blizzard Mortalities Assistance program provided assistance to Manitoba producers who experienced livestock losses following the blizzard that hit April 29th and 30th, 2011. Compensation is provided for animal deaths that occurred, as a result of the storm, between April 29th and May 5th 2011. This program is funded and administered by Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives (MAFRI).

Marketing and Vineyard Improvement Program (MVIP) (2015-2016)

This program provides funds for eligible vineyard improvements to enable growers in Ontario to produce quality grapes in order to respond to the growing demands of Ontario wine manufacturers and to adapt ongoing and emerging vineyard challenges. This payment will be overseen by Agricorp (a provincial crown corporation) and was created under the Wine and Grape Strategy to promote Ontario VQA (Ontario's Wine Authority) and support vineyard production improvements. Only certain non-capital payments to producers are included in the Direct payments data series (e.g. wine grape vine removal, land preparation, etc.).

Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) (1991 to 2009)

The Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) was established in 1991 under the Farm Income Protection Act.

The purpose of NISA was to encourage producers to save a portion of their income for use during periods of reduced income. Producers could deposit up to 3% of their Eligible Net Sales (ENS) annually in their NISA account and receive matching government contributions. The federal government and several provinces offered enhanced matching contributions over and above the base 3% on specified commodities. All these deposits earn a 3% interest bonus in addition to the regular rates offered by the financial institution where the account is held.

Most primary agricultural products were included in the calculation of Eligible Net Sales (sales of qualifying commodities minus purchases of qualifying commodities), the main exception being those covered by supply management (dairy, poultry and eggs).

The NISA account was comprised of two funds. Fund No. 1 which held producer deposits while Fund No. 2 contained the matching government contributions and all accumulated interest earned on both Fund 1 and Fund 2. Included as payments in the series «Direct Program Payments to Producers» were the producer withdrawals from Fund 2.

Nova Scotia Beef Kickstart Program (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008 provided funding for Nova Scotia's beef industry with the goal of helping the sector move toward greater economic self-sustainability.

Nova Scotia Margin Enhancement Program (2007 to 2008)

This initiative introduced in 2006, was a provincial initiative that provided additional income support to Nova Scotia producers. Using 2003 CAIS program data, reference margins of CAIS participants were increased by 10%.

Ontario Cattle, Hog and Horticulture Program (OCHHP) (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008, funded by the province of Ontario, was to assist farmers suffering from multiple financial pressures due to the stronger Canadian dollar, and lower market prices. Payments for cattle and hog producers were based on 12% of their historic allowable net sales, while payments for horticulture were based on 2% of allowable net sales.

Ontario Cost Recognition Top-up Program (2007 to 2010)

This program was a 40% matching provincial contribution to the federal Cost of Production Payment Program. This program was a direct payment to producers in recognition of rising production costs over the previous few years. The Ontario Top-Up Program payments were distributed after the payment details regarding the federal program were released.

Ontario Duponchelia Assistance Program (2008)

The purpose of this initiative was to provide financial support to horticulture producers in the Niagara Region of Ontario affected by Duponchelia, a reportable pest. The initiative provided a federal share (60%) of financial compensation to assist these producers in addressing plant replacement costs and in dealing with extraordinary expenses incurred due to quarantine measures imposed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

Ontario Edible Horticulture Crop Payment (2006)

This one-time payment compensates Ontario producers of edible horticulture crops for losses experienced on their 2005 crop.

Ontario Special Beekeepers Fund (2007 to 2008)

The Special Beekeepers Fund, enacted in June, 2007, provided direct compensation to beekeepers who suffered higher than normal hive losses during the winter of 2006. The assistance was designed to help bring Ontario's bee population back to near-normal levels, and beekeepers back to normal business.

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Programs (PED)

Prince Edward Island (2014) - The Prince Edward Island PED program provided financial aid to hog farmers for increased sanitation and screening measures to help combat the pig virus. This was a cost-shared program between the federal and provincial governments under Growing Forward 2. The program was administered by the PEI Hog Board.

Québec (2015 to present) - Emergency Fund Program in Response to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea (PED) and Swine Delta Coronavirus (SDCV) in Québec. The purpose of this program is to provide assistance to affected operations, up to a maximum of $20,000 per production site, to cover certain additional expenses required to combat this disease and prevent it from spreading. The program is financed by La Financière agricole and administered by the Québec swine health team (EQSP). The fund has a maximum budget of $400,000.

Portage Diversion Fail-Safe compensation program (2014 to present)

This program was designed to provide financial assistance to Manitoba agricultural producers affected by the 2014 flooding due to the operation of the Portage diversion fail-safe. This program was fully funded by the Manitoba Government and is being administrated by Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC).

Prince Edward Island Beef Industry Initiative (2007 to 2008)

This one-time payment for 2008 was designed to assist beef producers in Prince Edward Island to adjust to current market conditions and develop improved quality in their herds. The program provided immediate assistance to producers to help mitigate risk and provided genetics and enhanced herd health incentives. Payments were based on a combination of their average net sales and December 2007 inventory.

Prince Edward Island Hog Transition Fund (2008)

This program was designed to reduce hog numbers through a buyout program. It provided funds for producers to transition out of hog production.

Privately funded programs

Private hail insurance (1981 to present)

Private Hail Insurance is purchased by agricultural producers to protect themselves against the loss of their crops due to hail. Hail insurance is privately funded through producer premiums and producers may have the option to extend coverage for damage to crops due to loss through fire, depending on the insurance provider.

Other Private Programs (2011 to present)

  • Alberta Hog and Cattle Levy Refund (2011 to present)

    In May 2011, Alberta Pork announced it would refund 85 cents for every dollar of levies it had collected from producers during the 2010-2011 fiscal year to assist producers coping with rising feed costs and small profit margins.

    Legislation regarding levies in Alberta also changed in 2011. Levies for pork, beef, lamb, and potato producers had been mandatory until a change is legislation gave these producers the right to ask for a refund of the levies paid. Since that time, estimates for the hog and cattle levies refunded have been produced.

    Heinz payment (2013)

    Due to the closure of the Ontario Heinz processing plant in 2013, Heinz has paid a one-time 'goodwill' payment to compensate the farmers that were under contract to deliver processing tomatoes in 2013. The payment was to help offset costs that farmers may have incurred in preparing for the 2013 crop.

Programme d'aide pour les inondations en Montérégie (2011 to 2012)

This program provided financial assistance to agricultural enterprises affected by the floods of spring 2011, in the Richelieu valley. Compensation was offered to producers for loss of income due to flooded farmland, and/or losses due to unseeded acreage.

Programme d'appui à la replantation des vergers de pommiers au Québec (2007 to 2010)

The first component of this MAPAQ (Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec) program offered replanting help in order to improve efficiency, profitability as well as competitiveness. The objective of the second component was to compensate apple producers for the loss of apple trees due to winter-kill (frost) in 1994.

Provincial Stabilization Programs (1981 to present)

Under provincial stabilization programs, payments are made in order to support producer incomes affected by small profit margins, or low prices, for selected commodities. Provincial stabilization programs are partly funded by the provincial government, either directly through the subsidization of producer premiums, or indirectly by absorbing a part, or the whole, of the cost of administering the program. These programs are optional, and producers are required to pay premiums in order to participate.

Farm Income Stabilization Program (ASRA) (1981 to present)

The Farm Income Stabilization Insurance Program is designed to guarantee a positive net annual income to producers in Quebec. Producers participating in the program receive funds when the average selling price falls below a stabilized income, which is based on the average production cost in a specific sector. ASRA is complementary to AgriStability, but participation in AgriStability is not mandatory. Payments under ASRA decrease in accordance to amounts paid out through AgriStability. ASRA premiums are partially funded by the provincial government, which pays two thirds of the cost of premiums, while producers pay the remaining third.

Ontario Risk Management Program (RMP) (2007 to present)

ORMP is a provincial program that offers compensation to Ontario producers for losses of income caused by fluctuating market prices and rising production costs. Commodities eligible for compensation include a variety of grains and oilseeds, as well as certain livestock, including cattle, calves, hogs and sheep. The program also offers compensation for unseeded acres, under certain conditions. In order to participate in this program, producers must also participate in AgriStability, as well as Production Insurance (for grains and oilseeds). Payments made under ORMP count as an advance on the provincial portion of AgriStability for the corresponding program year. Because ORMP is provincially funded, it has no impact on the federal portion of AgriStability payments. ORMP premiums are partly funded by the provincial government, which pays 40% of the cost of premiums, while producers pay the remaining 60%.

Saskatchewan Cattle and Hog Support Program (2009)

This program helped producers retain their breeding herds and address immediate cash flow needs.

Saskatchewan Feed and Forage Program - 2011 (2011 to 2012)

This program provided compensation to producers who had to transport additional feed to their livestock, or transport their livestock to alternate locations for feeding and grazing, due to feed shortages caused by excess moisture. In addition, financial assistance was provided to producers who had to reseed hay, forage or pasture land that had been damaged by excess moisture. This provincially-funded program replaces the initial Saskatchewan Feed and Forage Program (2010-2011), which was jointly offered by the provincial and federal governments, as part of AgriRecovery.

Self-Directed Risk Management (SDRM) (2005 to present)

SDRM is a provincial program designed to help Ontarian horticultural producers manage farm operation risk. Under the program, over 150 edible horticultural crops are eligible for coverage, including fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, herbs and spices, nuts, honey and maple products. To be eligible, producers must also participate in AgriStability, and meet the minimum amount of allowable net sales (ANS). Participating producers can deposit up to a maximum of 2% of their ANS into an account, and have their contribution matched by the provincial government. Payments made under SDRM count as an advance on the provincial portion of AgriStability for the corresponding program year. Because SDRM is provincially funded, it has no impact on the federal portion of AgriStability payments. Amounts received under Production Insurance for a crop also covered by SDRM will be deducted from SDRM payments.

Shoal Lakes Agriculture Flooding Assistance Program (2011)

The purpose of this program is to provide financial support to agriculture producers affected by chronic flooding in the Shoal Lakes Complex in the Interlake of Manitoba.

  1. Land payments on a per acre basis were provided to farm operators to compensate for lost income related to agricultural production that cannot be realized due to flooded acres in 2010 and 2011.
  2. Financial assistance for transportation costs incurred between April 1, 2011 and March 15, 2012 to those farm operators who needed to transport feed to livestock or livestock to feed, due to the flooding.  

This payment was administered by the Manitoba Agriculture Corporation (MASC), with the assistance of Manitoba Agriculture, Food & Rural Initiatives (MAFRI).

Syndrome de dépérissement postsevrage (SDP) (2008 to 2010)

This MAPAQ (Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec) program granted financial support to Quebec feeder hog operations affected by Post Weaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome (PMWS).

Transitional Production Adjustment Program (1996) (1993 to 1997 and 1999 to 2008)

Under the Tree Fruit Revitalization Program, British Columbia orchardists were guaranteed specific annual revenue per acre during the first three years, following replant of orchards to new high density tree fruit varieties.

Tree fruit grafting/budding and replant program (2008 to 2011, 2012 to present)

In 2008, the Transitional Production Adjustment Program ended and the Tree fruit grafting/budding and replant program started. In July 2007, the federal and provincial governments jointly announced that they were investing $8 million to help British Columbia's tree fruit and grape industries adapt to changing markets. The cost was shared (60% federal, 40% provincial) and the program lasted for three years. In 2012, the provincial government invested an additional $2 million to replant tree fruit orchards to expand domestic markets through high-quality products by targeting the planting of premium varieties. The program, which also includes a grafting and budding component, concluded in 2014. The 2015 program is the first year of a 7 year commitment by British Columbia of $8.4 million announced in Nov 2014. This is a British Columbia Agriculture Department program that shares the administration of the program with the British Columbia Fruit Growers Association under contract until 2016.

Unseeded Acreage Payment - 2006 (2006 to 2007)

This program provided a payment to Saskatchewan farmers who experienced excess moisture conditions prior to June 20, 2006 and were unable to seed 95% of the acres they would normally intend to seed.

Waterfowl Damage (1981 to present)

Waterfowl damage payment programs are designed to compensate producers for crop losses caused by waterfowl. Compensation is also available for cleaning excreta contaminated grain in some provinces, and for prevention management.

Also see Crop loss compensation, Livestock predation compensation and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Wildlife Damage Compensation Program

British Columbia (2002 to present) - The British Columbia Wildlife Compensation program is part of an Agricultural Environment Partnership Initiative that includes the following programs: The Waterfowl Damage to Forage Fields in Delta, Wild Predator Loss Control and Compensation Program for Cattle and East Kootenay Agriculture Wildlife Pilot Project. These programs are designed to compensate producers for the losses incurred to crops and livestock due to wildlife.

New Brunswick (2014 to present) - This cost-shared program compensates producers who suffer livestock or crop losses due to wildlife. Compensation is available for specified crops and livestock for damage caused by eligible wildlife. The maximum compensation per producer is $50,000 per year. The New Brunswick Agricultural Insurance Commission (NBAIC) administers this program, applicants are not required to be an insurance client to receive compensation.

Nova Scotia (2008 to present) - This cost-shared program, announced in 2008, will help address some of the risks experienced by Nova Scotia farmers regarding damage to eligible agricultural products because of the activities of wildlife, including wildlife predation on livestock and damage to crops. Applicants are not required to have crop insurance.

Ontario (2008 to present) - The Ontario Wildlife Damage Compensation Program provides financial assistance to eligible applicants whose livestock and poultry have been injured or killed by wolves, coyotes, bears and other species of wildlife identified in the program guidelines, or whose bee-colonies, bee-hives and bee-hive related equipment have been damaged by bears, raccoons, deer and skunks. The program was funded by the provincial government up to the fiscal year of 2008/2009 and became part of Growing Forward - a federal, provincial and territorial initiative starting from fiscal year 2009/2010, when cost-sharing of the program began between the governments of Canada and Ontario.

Also see Crop loss compensation, Livestock predation compensation and Waterfowl damage programs.

Food Services and Drinking Places (Monthly): CVs for Total Sales by Geography - September 2017 to September 2018

CVs for Total Sales by Geography
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for Total Sales by Geography. The information is grouped by geography (appearing as row headers), Month, 201709, 201710, 201711, 201712, 201801, 201802, 201803, 201804, 201805, 201806, 201807, 201808 and 201809 (appearing as column headers), calculated using percentage unit of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography Month
201709 201710 201711 201712 201801 201802 201803 201804 201805 201806 201807 201808 201809
percentage
Canada 0.58 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.68 0.64 0.63 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.72 0.69 0.66
Newfoundland and Labrador 1.24 1.54 1.08 1.38 1.34 1.45 1.37 1.01 1.28 1.38 1.76 1.52 1.43
Prince Edward Island 6.04 4.27 2.96 3.23 2.71 1.70 3.38 3.24 3.76 3.34 6.79 4.05 6.39
Nova Scotia 2.63 2.62 3.14 2.48 2.32 3.45 3.37 3.42 2.17 2.48 5.24 3.71 2.80
New Brunswick 1.71 1.46 1.37 3.04 2.58 2.67 2.26 2.41 1.46 2.99 3.51 2.67 2.35
Quebec  1.18 1.22 1.26 1.29 1.49 1.37 1.29 1.34 1.19 1.21 1.34 1.24 1.33
Ontario 1.03 1.01 1.04 1.01 1.24 1.15 1.18 1.11 1.21 1.22 1.21 1.15 1.02
Manitoba 2.21 1.80 1.98 2.21 2.36 2.36 2.02 2.17 1.77 1.67 1.87 1.82 1.79
Saskatchewan 1.48 1.50 1.43 1.43 1.29 1.51 1.46 1.57 1.32 1.29 1.22 1.40 1.51
Alberta 1.33 1.15 1.04 0.99 1.25 0.96 0.94 1.13 1.13 0.99 1.19 1.15 1.12
British Columbia 1.75 1.68 1.63 1.78 1.96 1.86 1.77 2.08 2.24 2.13 2.42 2.39 2.43
Yukon Territory 3.58 2.89 1.19 3.01 3.58 2.77 2.38 1.81 1.85 3.79 2.89 3.07 2.26
Northwest Territories 0.97 0.99 1.03 1.15 1.12 1.10 1.25 1.51 1.60 1.15 0.75 0.83 0.78
Nunavut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 0.66 13.51 9.14 5.50 8.79 15.77

CVs for operating revenue - Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing - 2017

CVs for operating revenue - Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing - 2016
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for operating revenue - Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing. The information is grouped by Regions (appearing as row headers), CVs for operating revenue, calculated using pourcentage units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 1.53
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.00
Prince Edward Island 0.00
Nova Scotia 0.83
New Brunswick 0.00
Quebec 3.84
Ontario 3.12
Manitoba 1.42
Saskatchewan 1.08
Alberta 2.96
British Columbia 2.69
Yukon 1.20
Northwest Territories 0.00
Nunavut 0.00

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures, Q2 2018

C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures, Q2 2018 in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000)
Table summary
This table displays the results of C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures. The information is grouped by Duration of trip (appearing as row headers), Main Trip Purpose, Country or Region of Expenditures (Total, Canada, United States, Overseas) calculated using Visit-Expenditures in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000) and c.v. as units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Duration of Visit Main Trip Purpose Country or Region of Expenditures
Total Canada United States Overseas
$ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V.
Total Duration Total Main Trip Purpose 20,338,001 A 10,613,790 A 5,277,939 A 4,446,271 A
Holiday, leisure or recreation 11,178,595 A 4,228,497 A 3,665,513 B 3,284,585 B
Visit friends or relatives 3,844,616 A 2,783,976 A 491,165 B 569,475 B
Personal conference, convention or trade show 483,186 B 347,009 C 124,199 C 11,978 E
Shopping, non-routine 975,044 C 809,364 C 158,542 B 7,139 E
Other personal reasons 1,039,126 B 723,805 B 114,662 C 200,658 D
Business conference, convention or trade show 1,278,496 B 690,205 B 418,402 B 169,888 C
Other business 1,538,937 B 1,030,934 B 305,456 B 202,548 D
Same-Day Total Main Trip Purpose 3,973,002 B 3,561,596 B 359,318 B 52,088 D
Holiday, leisure or recreation 1,445,831 A 1,219,273 B 177,273 B 49,285 D
Visit friends or relatives 915,856 B 862,076 B 53,780 E .. ..
Personal conference, convention or trade show 130,676 D 125,950 D 1,923 E 2,804 E
Shopping, non-routine 812,062 C 707,649 C 104,412 B ..  ..
Other personal reasons 314,960 B 310,448 B 4,512 D ..  ..
Business conference, convention or trade show 68,142 B 56,583 B 11,559 E ..  ..
Other business 285,475 C 279,616 C 5,859 E ..  ..
Overnight Total Main Trip Purpose 16,364,999 A 7,052,195 A 4,918,622 A 4,394,183 A
Holiday, leisure or recreation 9,732,765 A 3,009,224 A 3,488,240 B 3,235,300 B
Visit friends or relatives 2,928,760 A 1,921,900 A 437,385 B 569,475 B
Personal conference, convention or trade show 352,510 B 221,059 C 122,276 C 9,174 E
Shopping, non-routine 162,983 C 101,714 C 54,130 D 7,139 E
Other personal reasons 724,166 B 413,357 B 110,150 C 200,658 D
Business conference, convention or trade show 1,210,353 B 633,622 B 406,843 B 169,888 C
Other business 1,253,463 B 751,318 B 299,597 C 202,548 D
..
data not available

Estimates contained in this table have been assigned a letter to indicate their coefficient of variation (c.v.) (expressed as a percentage). The letter grades represent the following coefficients of variation:

A
c.v. between or equal to 0.00% and 5.00% and means Excellent.
B
c.v. between or equal to 5.01% and 15.00% and means Very good.
C
c.v. between or equal to 15.01% and 25.00% and means Good.
D
c.v. between or equal to 25.01% and 35.00% and means Acceptable.
E
c.v. greater than 35.00% and means Use with caution.