Payments Enhancing Receipts

Explanatory notes for programs which existed prior to 2007 can be found in the discontinued Direct Payments to Agriculture Producers publication (21-015-X).

Agricultural Revenue Stabilization Account (ARSA) (2000 to 2002)

The objective of the Agricultural Revenue Stabilization Account program was to offer a risk management tool to farming operations in Quebec, based on the operation's gross income. To this effect, the program established two individual funds, for contributions from participants and La Financière agricole du Québec, and made provisions for withdrawals from these funds to compensate for reductions in farm income. The ARSA was a program developed and administered by La Financière agricole du Québec.

Following the introduction of the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Program, La Financière agricole du Québec terminated this program in the 2002 program year. Consequently, participants had five years to make withdrawals from their account, at an annual minimum of 20% of the government contribution held on February 1st, 2005.

AgriInvest (2008 to present)

This program was created under the Growing Forward policy framework (2007 – 2013) and has continued under Growing Forward 2 (2013 – 2018) and the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (effective April 1, 2018). AgriInvest replaces part of the coverage that had been available under the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program, and, operates similar to the former Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) program.

Through government and producer contributions, AgriInvest provides cash flow to help producers manage small income declines, as well as provide support for investments to mitigate risks or improve market income. Producers can deposit up to 100% of their Allowable Net Sales, with the first 1% matched by governments. The limit on matching government contributions is $10,000 per AgriInvest account. AgriInvest is administered by the Federal government in all provinces except Quebec.

Agri-Québec (2011 to present)

Agri-Québec is a self-directed risk management program offered to all farming and aqua-farming operations in Quebec. The program allows participants to deposit an amount in an account under their name, in order to receive matching contributions from La Financière agricole du Québec. Participants can then withdraw the funds from the accounts, based on their operational needs. Agri-Québec is managed jointly by the provincial and federal governments, as it is similar and complimentary to AgriInvest.

Agri-Québec Plus (2015 to present)

The Agri-Québec Plus program offers additional financial assistance to eligible operations. Agri-Québec Plus complements AgriStability by offering a coverage level of 85% of the reference margin rather than 70%. The program covers agriculture products that are not covered or not associated with the ASRA program (Farm Income Stabilization Program) and are not supply-managed. Participation in the program is linked to the respect of environmental requirements.

AgriRecovery (2008 to present)

The AgriRecovery framework is part of a suite of federal-provincial-territorial (FPT) Business Risk Management (BRM) tools under the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (replacing Growing Forward 2, as of 2018).

AgriRecovery was designed to provide quick, targeted assistance to producers in case of natural disasters, with a focus on the extraordinary costs producers must take on to recover from disasters. Federal and provincial governments jointly determine whether further assistance beyond existing programs already in place is necessary, and what form of assistance should be provided. AgriRecovery initiatives are cost-shared on a 60:40 basis between the federal government and participating provinces or territories. The assistance provided will be unique to the specific disaster situation and often unique to a province or region. Examples of programs included in AgriRecovery are the 2017 and 2018 Canada-BC Wildfire Recovery Initiatives, and the 2017 Canada-Quebec Hail Assistance Initiative.

AgriStability (2007 to present)

This program was created under the Growing Forward policy framework (2007 – 2013) and has continued under Growing Forward 2 (2013 – 2018) and the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (effective April 1, 2018). AgriStability was developed as a margin-based program that provides income support when a producer experiences a large margin decline. AgriStability has replaced part of the coverage that had been provided under the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program.

AgriStability is delivered in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and Yukon by the Federal government. In British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and Prince Edward Island, AgriStability is delivered provincially.

AgriStability Program Enhancements (2021 to 2022)

Through the Prince Edward Island Agriculture Insurance Corporation, the Department of Agriculture and Land announced some important changes to the AgriStability Program. These changes will provide increased support to all producers for the 2021 and 2022 program years:

• The coverage level is being increased to 85% from 70%, reducing the margin loss a producer must incur to trigger a payment.
• The compensation rate is being increased from 70% to 80% of the loss covered.
• The 20% late participation penalty for the 2021 program year will be covered and paid by the province.

All changes will be 100% covered by the PEI government, including the federal portion of the cost-share.

Assiniboine Valley Producers Flood Assistance Program (2007 to 2011)

This Province of Manitoba program provided financial assistance for Assiniboine Valley agricultural producers who experienced crop loss or the inability to seed a crop in 2005 and 2006 along the Assiniboine River from the Shellmouth Dam to Brandon, due to flooding. This program also provided assistance in 2011, following flooding in 2010.

These programs were managed through the Manitoba Agricultural Service Corporation (MASC).

Beef Herd Renewal and Improvement Program (2022 to 2023)

The objective of this program is to grow, renew and improve the New Brunswick beef cow herd. Applicants will be eligible for financial assistance of $300 per retained bred heifer above a 5% replacement rate. Eligible numbers of heifers will be determined based on current mature cow numbers, defined as cows that have already had at least one calf. Included as payments in the series «Direct Program Payments to Producers» is the compensation paid for the basic herd growth.

Beekeepers Financial Assistance Program (2014)

Due to harsh winter conditions in Ontario in 2014, and other pollinator health issues, Ontario's bee colonies experienced higher than normal mortality rates. To help offset these losses, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food provided one-time financial assistance of $105 per hive to beekeepers who have 10 hives or more and lost over 40 per cent of their colonies between Jan. 1, 2014, and Oct. 31, 2014.

British Columbia Raspberry Replant Program (2022 to 2023)

The B.C. Raspberry Replant Program is a cost-sharing funding program which is intended to revitalize, regenerate and increase the competitiveness of the B.C. raspberry industry in local and global markets. This program is being delivered by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food with input from the Raspberry Industry Development Council.

Canada-Ontario General Top-Up Program (2005 to 2007)

This was a special top-up payment program which provided whole farm coverage to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program participants in Ontario, who were automatically enrolled. All commodities eligible for CAIS payment were covered under this program. In order to qualify, participants must have experienced a decline in their program year production margin as calculated by the CAIS Program Administrator and be eligible to receive the government portion of the CAIS payment. The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs were responsible for the overall administration of the program.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program (2004 to 2008)

The CAIS program was available to producers across Canada and provided assistance to those producers who had experienced a loss of income as a result of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or other factors. The program integrated stabilization and disaster protection into a single program, helping producers protect their farming operations from both small and large drops in income.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Inventory Transition Initiative (CITI) (2006 to 2007)

CITI was a one-time federal government injection of $900 million into Canada's Agriculture and Agri-food industry. The funds were delivered to producers by recalculating how the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program valued inventory change for the 2003, 2004, and 2005 CAIS program years.

Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Ontario Inventory Transition Initiative (2006 to 2019)

The Ontario Inventory Transition Payment was an additional one-time payment from the province of Ontario, for the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program participants, as it transitioned to a new method of valuing inventory for CAIS.

Compensation for animal losses (1981 to present)

Formerly a program under the Animal Disease and Protection Act, this compensation program is now administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in accordance with requirements established under the Health of Animals Act. Producers in all provinces are compensated when farm animals infected with certain contagious diseases are ordered to be slaughtered. Compensation also includes applicable transportation and disposal costs and compensation for animals injured during testing.

Cost of Production Payment (COP) (2007 to 2010)

This program helped non-supply managed commodities producers with the rising cost of production. This federal program was based on producers' net sales for 2000-2004 (or in the case of new producers: payments were based on average net sales for 2005-2006).

Cover Crop Protection Program (CCPP) (2006 to 2008)

The CCPP was a Government of Canada initiative designed to provide financial assistance to agricultural producers who were unable to seed commercial crops as a result of flooding in the spring of 2005 and/or 2006.

Crop Insurance (1981 to present)

Crop Insurance (now referred to as AgriInsurance) is a federal-provincial-producer cost-shared program that stabilizes a producer's income by minimizing the economic effects of production losses caused by natural hazards. AgriInsurance is a provincially delivered program to which the federal government contributes a portion of total premiums and administrative costs. Premiums for most crop insurance programs are cost-shared: 40 per cent by participating producers, 36 per cent by the federal government and 24 per cent by the province, while administrative costs are funded by governments, 60 per cent by the federal government and 40 per cent by the province.

AgriInsurance plans are developed and delivered by each province to meet the needs of the producers in that province. AgriInsurance helps to cover production losses as well as losses from poor product quality. Both yield and non-yield based plans are offered. These plans cover traditional crops such as wheat, corn, oats and barley as well as horticultural crops such as lettuce, strawberries, carrots and eggplants. Some provinces also provide coverage for bee mortality as well as maple syrup production. The provinces constantly work to improve their programs by adjusting existing plans and implementing new ones to meet changing industry requirements.

Crop Loss Compensation (1981 to present)

Crop loss compensation programs are generally one element of a province's Wildlife damage compensation programs, which can also include separate Waterfowl damage and Livestock predation programs. This Big Game program reduces the financial loss incurred by producers in these provinces from wildlife damage to eligible crops, and can include compensation for wildlife excreta contaminated crops and silage in pits and tubes. In some provinces damage to honey producers and leafcutter bee products is also included.

Also see Livestock predation compensation, Waterfowl damage and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Cull Animal Program (2003 to 2006)

This program was intended to assist farmers with the additional cost of feeding surplus animals while the US border was closed to Canadian animals over 30 months of age. With the goal of discouraging on-farm slaughter and encouraging movement of mature animals to domestic markets in an orderly fashion.

Cull Breeding Swine Program (2008)

This federally funded program for 2008, administered by the Canadian Pork Council, was designed to help restructure the industry to bring it in line with market realities. The objective was to reduce the national breeding herd size by up to 10% over and above normal annual reductions. Producers were eligible to receive a per head payment for each animal slaughtered as well as reimbursement for slaughter and disposal costs. Producers had to agree to empty at least one barn, and not restock for a three year period.

Dairy Direct Payment Program (2019-2023)

The objective of the Dairy Direct Payment Program is to support dairy producers as a result of market access commitments made under recent international trade agreements, namely the Canada–European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

In August 2019, the federal government announced that it will make available $1.75 billion to supply-managed milk producers. Up to $345 million in direct payments was made available in 2019-2020.

In November 2020, the government announced the payment schedule for the remaining $1.405 billion in direct payments over the next three years:

• $468 million in 2020-21
• $469 million in 2021-22
• $468 million in 2022-23

The Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) has been mandated to deliver the program.

Drought Assistance for Livestock Producers (2007 to 2008)

This program was enacted in 2007, to assist livestock owners in Northern B.C. who suffered economic hardship in 2006 due to drought. Drought conditions in the summer of 2006 reduced hay and forage yields by up to 50% and producers were left with higher costs for feed, water and other expenses.

Eurasian Wild Boar Transition Assistance Initiative (2021 to 2022)

The purpose of this Initiative was to provide financial support to producers of EWB to assist them in transitioning out of the production of EWB and into other forms of production. The need for this type of financial support arose out of the passage of a regulation under the Invasive Species Act, 2015 that designated Ontario as an invasive species control area for wild pigs, including the possession and movement of EWB.

Farm Emergency Response Grant Program (2022)

A one-time grant of $2,500 will be sent to registered farms in Central, Northern and Eastern Nova Scotia that experienced financial losses due to infrastructure or crop damage, livestock loss or extended power outages due to Hurricane Fiona. Funding will also be available to registered farms that experienced storm damage outside the most impacted regions.

Fed Cattle Set Aside Program (2005 to 2006)

The program was part of a national strategy to assist Canada's cattle industry to reposition itself to help ensure its long-term viability.

Financial Assistance for Replanting Apple Orchards (2020-2022)

The financial assistance for replanting apple orchards program is being implemented to support the apple industry during the transition period following the termination of the Farm Income Stabilization Insurance Program coverage.

The program is intended to support development of the apple industry from a sustainable development perspective, as a complement to other government assistance available to the apple industry.

More specifically, this program is intended to provide financial support to apple businesses in their apple orchard replanting projects.

Eligible businesses may receive financial assistance of $5,000 per replanted hectare for up to four hectares. If the business is deemed eligible for one of the grants under the Financial Support Program for Aspiring Farmers on the date that they submitted their application to the program, the assistance is increased to $6,250 per eligible hectare.

Frost loss Program (2018-2019)

The Frost Loss Program helped Nova Scotia Farmers recover from crop and financial losses from the frost in June 2018.

This program provided financial assistance in addition with other Business Risk Management programs that were available, such as AgriInsurance.

Golden Nematode Disaster Program (2007 to 2009)

The objective of this program was to assist producers affected by Golden Nematode with the costs of disposing potatoes and a per hectare support payment to assist potato producers and producers of nursery and greenhouse crops with extraordinary costs not covered under existing programs. The program was funded by the federal government.

Grains and Oilseeds Payment (GOPP) (2006)

The Grains and Oilseeds Payment Program was a one-time program for producers of grains, oilseeds, or special crops, to help address the severe economic hardships they were facing.

Hazelnut Renewal Program (2020 to present)

This provincially funded program provides funds to remove infected trees to mitigate the spread of Eastern Filbert Blight and to provide incentives for the planting of new disease-resistant hazelnut trees in British Columbia.

Types of Program Funding:

• Hazelnut Renewal: Funding to provide incentives for the planting of new Eastern Filbert Blight (EFB) resistant hazelnut trees in British Columbia.
• Removal of EFB Infected Hazelnut Trees: Funding to remove infected trees to mitigate the spread of EFB and to protect new orchards.

Hog Transition Fund (2008)

This program was designed to assist Nova Scotia hog producers who were having financial difficulties due to declining market prices in 2006-2007. The program was administered through Pork Nova Scotia.

Lake Manitoba Flood Assistance Program (2011 to present)

This program was designed to provide financial compensation to crop and livestock producers affected by the flooding of Lake Manitoba in 2011. Part A - Lake Manitoba Pasture Flooding Assistance Component and Part B - Lake Manitoba Transportation and Crop/Forage Loss Component, are included. This program is funded entirely by the provincial government.

Livestock Insurance Programs (1991 to present)

The Livestock Insurance Programs include a number of provincially administered livestock insurance programs. These programs include:

The Cattle Price Insurance Program (2009 to present), designed to provide Alberta cattle producers with an effective price risk management tool reflective of their risk. As of 2014, this program is now referred to as the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program.

Dairy Livestock Insurance (1991 to present), implemented to assist Nova Scotia producers when a number of cattle were lost due to disease outbreaks. The program continues to exist for situations resulting in a significant loss in production, causing a loss of revenue.

The Hog Price Insurance Program (2011 to present), designed to provide Alberta hog producers with protection against unexpected declines in Alberta hog prices, over a defined period of time. As of 2014, this program is now referred to as the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program.

Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador (1991 to present) compensates producers for the death or injury to sheep, goats, dairy cattle or beef cattle caused by dogs or other predators.

Livestock Insurance in Prince Edward Island (2009 to present) offers two types of coverage: compensation to cattle producers for the death of an animal due to disease, as well as compensation to dairy producers whose production levels fall beneath a set threshold, causing a loss of income.

The Overwinter Bee Mortality Insurance (2012 to present) insures Manitoban beekeepers against unmanageable wintering losses, including weather-related damages, diseases and pests. As of 2014 the data for this program is included in Crop Insurance.

Poultry Insurance (2008 to present) compensates Nova Scotia producers for the loss of poultry (which includes broilers, breeders, breeder pullets, layer pullets, commercial layers and integrated layers) to the disease infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT).

The Western Livestock Price Insurance Program (WLPIP) (2014 to present) enables livestock producers to purchase price protection on cattle and hogs in the form of an insurance policy. It offers protection against an unexpected drop in prices over a defined period of time, and is available to producers in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

Administration costs are covered by the federal and provincial governments through Growing Forward 2. Premiums will be fully funded by producers, but any deficit after four years will be made up by the federal government. The four-province program will be managed by the Alberta Agriculture Financial Services Corp, which ran the pre-existing Cattle and Hog Price Insurance programs in Alberta. Crop insurance entities in Manitoba and Saskatchewan will deliver the WLPIP in those provinces. The Business Risk Management Branch of the British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture delivers the program in that province.

Additional notes on the Livestock Insurance Programs

Producer premiums for the Prince Edward Island Livestock Insurance and Dairy Livestock Insurance in Nova Scotia (as of 2006) are partially subsidized by the provincial and federal governments.

Premiums are not subsidized for the Cattle Price Insurance Program, the Hog Price Insurance Program, Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador, Poultry Insurance program in Nova Scotia, or the Western Livestock Price Insurance Program. However, the costs of administrating the programs are funded by provincial governments and/or Crown Corporations.

Prior to 2005, Dairy Livestock Insurance in Nova Scotia and Livestock Insurance in Newfoundland and Labrador were reported under Programs funded by the private sector.

Livestock Predation Compensation Program

Manitoba (1999 to present) - This program compensates livestock producers in Manitoba for losses from injury or death of eligible livestock that resulted from losses due to natural predators such as black bear, cougar, wolf or coyote. Compensation is available to 100% of the assessed value of the animal, for a confirmed loss due to predation and to 50% of the value for a probable loss. In respect for livestock injured, the payment will be the lesser of the veterinary treatment or the value of the livestock. The government of Manitoba pays 60% of program payments and the Government of Canada 40%. Administration costs are cost-shared 50/50 between the Government of Canada and the Government of Manitoba.

Saskatchewan (2010 to present) - Under the Wildlife Damage Compensation Program, the Saskatchewan Compensation for Livestock Predation compensates producers for livestock killed or injured by predators. The first 80 percent of the program funding is cost-shared by federal and provincial governments. The provincial government contributes the remaining amount. The program is administered by the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation. Other components of the Wildlife Damage Compensation Program include Waterfowl damage compensation and Crops loss compensation (reported separately).

Also see Crop loss compensation, Waterfowl damage and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Manitoba Ruminant Assistance Program (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008, funded jointly by the province of Manitoba and the federal government, allowed cattle producers to receive a direct payment of up to 3% of historical net sales. The payment, administered by the Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC), was provided to all ruminant producers and was in proportion to the size of the producer's livestock operations.

Manitoba Spring Blizzard Livestock Mortalities Assistance Program (2011 to 2012)

The 2011 Manitoba Spring Blizzard Mortalities Assistance program provided assistance to Manitoba producers who experienced livestock losses following the blizzard that hit April 29th and 30th, 2011. Compensation is provided for animal deaths that occurred, as a result of the storm, between April 29th and May 5th 2011. This program is funded and administered by Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives (MAFRI).

Marketing and Vineyard Improvement Program (MVIP) (2015-2016)

This program provides funds for eligible vineyard improvements to enable growers in Ontario to produce quality grapes in order to respond to the growing demands of Ontario wine manufacturers and to adapt ongoing and emerging vineyard challenges. This payment will be overseen by Agricorp (a provincial crown corporation) and was created under the Wine and Grape Strategy to promote Ontario VQA (Ontario's Wine Authority) and support vineyard production improvements. Only certain non-capital payments to producers are included in the Direct payments data series (e.g. wine grape vine removal, land preparation, etc.).

Measure to support grain corn producers in mitigating the impact of the 2019 rise in propane prices in Québec (2020)

The measure to support grain corn producers in mitigating the impact of the 2019 rise in propane prices in Québec was meant to help reduce the repercussions on grain corn production due to the rise in prices of propane which is used to dry grain corn. This measure covered grain corn not yet harvested by November 19, 2019, the date when Canadian National Railway employees went on strike.

Financial assistance was provided in the form of a maximum flat rate of $23.50 per hectare of eligible grain corn areas for up to $50,000 per farm business.

Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) (1991 to 2009)

The Net Income Stabilization Account (NISA) was established in 1991 under the Farm Income Protection Act.

The purpose of NISA was to encourage producers to save a portion of their income for use during periods of reduced income. Producers could deposit up to 3% of their Eligible Net Sales (ENS) annually in their NISA account and receive matching government contributions. The federal government and several provinces offered enhanced matching contributions over and above the base 3% on specified commodities. All these deposits earn a 3% interest bonus in addition to the regular rates offered by the financial institution where the account is held.

Most primary agricultural products were included in the calculation of Eligible Net Sales (sales of qualifying commodities minus purchases of qualifying commodities), the main exception being those covered by supply management (dairy, poultry and eggs).

The NISA account was comprised of two funds. Fund No. 1 which held producer deposits while Fund No. 2 contained the matching government contributions and all accumulated interest earned on both Fund 1 and Fund 2. Included as payments in the series «Direct Program Payments to Producers» were the producer withdrawals from Fund 2.

Nova Scotia Beef Kickstart Program (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008 provided funding for Nova Scotia's beef industry with the goal of helping the sector move toward greater economic self-sustainability.

Nova Scotia Margin Enhancement Program (2007 to 2008)

This initiative introduced in 2006, was a provincial initiative that provided additional income support to Nova Scotia producers. Using 2003 CAIS program data, reference margins of CAIS participants were increased by 10%.

Ontario AgriStability Top Up Program (2022)

The purpose of the Program is to help offset losses resulting from factors beyond the control of farmers in Ontario, including those as a result of increased market uncertainty exacerbated by the COVID-19 Pandemic, by providing Ontario's forty percent (40%) share of an increase of ten percent (10%) to the maximum Payment Benefit provided under AgriStability.

Ontario Cattle, Hog and Horticulture Program (OCHHP) (2008)

This one-time payment for 2008, funded by the province of Ontario, was to assist farmers suffering from multiple financial pressures due to the stronger Canadian dollar, and lower market prices. Payments for cattle and hog producers were based on 12% of their historic allowable net sales, while payments for horticulture were based on 2% of allowable net sales.

Ontario Cost Recognition Top-up Program (2007 to 2010)

This program was a 40% matching provincial contribution to the federal Cost of Production Payment Program. This program was a direct payment to producers in recognition of rising production costs over the previous few years. The Ontario Top-Up Program payments were distributed after the payment details regarding the federal program were released.

Ontario Duponchelia Assistance Program (2008)

The purpose of this initiative was to provide financial support to horticulture producers in the Niagara Region of Ontario affected by Duponchelia, a reportable pest. The initiative provided a federal share (60%) of financial compensation to assist these producers in addressing plant replacement costs and in dealing with extraordinary expenses incurred due to quarantine measures imposed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

Ontario Edible Horticulture Crop Payment (2006)

This one-time payment compensates Ontario producers of edible horticulture crops for losses experienced on their 2005 crop.

Ontario Edible Horticultural Support Program (2018-2019)

This program provided financial support to Ontario producers of edible horticulture products (small and medium-size agricultural operators) to adjust to the changing small business environment. This program was funded by the Government of Ontario and the payments were based on net sales of edible horticulture. Self-Directed Risk Management Program participants were enrolled automatically.

Ontario Special Beekeepers Fund (2007 to 2008)

The Special Beekeepers Fund, enacted in June, 2007, provided direct compensation to beekeepers who suffered higher than normal hive losses during the winter of 2006. The assistance was designed to help bring Ontario's bee population back to near-normal levels, and beekeepers back to normal business.

PEI Pollination Expansion Program (2021 present)

The Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture and Land has established the PEI Pollination Expansion Program to support the sustainable increase of local honey bee colonies that are available for the pollination of wild blueberries and other fruit crops and the advancement of the beekeeping sector through strategic industry initiatives.

PEI Potato Seed Recovery Program (2020)

The purpose of the Potato Seed Recovery Program was to offset extraordinary costs and a loss in revenue for Island seed potato producers impacted by the pandemic. This payment was a $1.19 million fund and was a provincially funded program.

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Programs (PED)

Prince Edward Island (2014) - The Prince Edward Island PED program provided financial aid to hog farmers for increased sanitation and screening measures to help combat the pig virus. This was a cost-shared program between the federal and provincial governments under Growing Forward 2. The program was administered by the PEI Hog Board.

Québec (2015 to present) - Emergency Fund Program in Response to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea (PED) and Swine Delta Coronavirus (SDCV) in Québec. The purpose of this program is to provide assistance to affected operations, up to a maximum of $20,000 per production site, to cover certain additional expenses required to combat this disease and prevent it from spreading. The program is financed by La Financière agricole and administered by the Québec swine health team (EQSP). The fund has a maximum budget of $400,000.

Portage Diversion Fail-Safe compensation program (2014 to 2015)

This program was designed to provide financial assistance to Manitoba agricultural producers affected by the 2014 flooding due to the operation of the Portage diversion fail-safe. This program was fully funded by the Manitoba Government and administrated by the Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC).

Post-tropical Storm Dorian Response Program (DRP) (2020-2021)

The Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture and Land had established the Post-tropical Storm Dorian Response Program (DRP) to provide financial support to corn, crambe, and tree fruit producers who had incurred extraordinary costs due to Dorian which were not covered by existing Business Risk Management programs.

Prince Edward Island Beef Industry Initiative (2007 to 2008)

This one-time payment for 2008 was designed to assist beef producers in Prince Edward Island to adjust to current market conditions and develop improved quality in their herds. The program provided immediate assistance to producers to help mitigate risk and provided genetics and enhanced herd health incentives. Payments were based on a combination of their average net sales and December 2007 inventory.

Prince Edward Island Hog Transition Fund (2008)

This program was designed to reduce hog numbers through a buyout program. It provided funds for producers to transition out of hog production.

Privately funded programs

Private hail insurance (1981 to present)

Private Hail Insurance is purchased by agricultural producers to protect themselves against the loss of their crops due to hail. Hail insurance is privately funded through producer premiums and producers may have the option to extend coverage for damage to crops due to loss through fire, depending on the insurance provider.

Other Private Programs (2011 to present)

Alberta Hog and Cattle Levy Refund (2011 to present)

In May 2011, Alberta Pork announced it would refund 85 cents for every dollar of levies it had collected from producers during the 2010-2011 fiscal year to assist producers coping with rising feed costs and small profit margins.

Legislation regarding levies in Alberta also changed in 2011. Levies for pork, beef, lamb, and potato producers had been mandatory until a change is legislation gave these producers the right to ask for a refund of the levies paid. Since that time, estimates for the hog and cattle levies refunded have been produced.

Heinz payment (2013)

Due to the closure of the Ontario Heinz processing plant in 2013, Heinz has paid a one-time 'goodwill' payment to compensate the farmers that were under contract to deliver processing tomatoes in 2013. The payment was to help offset costs that farmers may have incurred in preparing for the 2013 crop.

Programme d'aide pour les inondations en Montérégie (2011 to 2012)

This program provided financial assistance to agricultural enterprises affected by the floods of spring 2011, in the Richelieu valley. Compensation was offered to producers for loss of income due to flooded farmland, and/or losses due to unseeded acreage.

Programme d'appui à la replantation des vergers de pommiers au Québec (2007 to 2010)

The first component of this MAPAQ (Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec) program offered replanting help in order to improve efficiency, profitability as well as competitiveness. The objective of the second component was to compensate apple producers for the loss of apple trees due to winter-kill (frost) in 1994.

Provincial Stabilization Programs (1981 to present)

Under provincial stabilization programs, payments are made in order to support producer incomes affected by small profit margins, or low prices, for selected commodities. Provincial stabilization programs are partly funded by the provincial government, either directly through the subsidization of producer premiums, or indirectly by absorbing a part, or the whole, of the cost of administering the program. These programs are optional, and producers are required to pay premiums in order to participate.

Farm Income Stabilization Program (ASRA) (1981 to present)

The Farm Income Stabilization Insurance Program is designed to guarantee a positive net annual income to producers in Quebec. Producers participating in the program receive funds when the average selling price falls below a stabilized income, which is based on the average production cost in a specific sector. ASRA is complementary to AgriStability, but participation in AgriStability is not mandatory. Payments under ASRA decrease in accordance to amounts paid out through AgriStability. ASRA premiums are partially funded by the provincial government, which pays two thirds of the cost of premiums, while producers pay the remaining third.

Ontario Risk Management Program (RMP) (2007 to present)

ORMP is a provincial program that offers compensation to Ontario producers for losses of income caused by fluctuating market prices and rising production costs. Commodities eligible for compensation include a variety of grains and oilseeds, as well as certain livestock, including cattle, calves, hogs and sheep. The program also offers compensation for unseeded acres, under certain conditions. In order to participate in this program, producers must also participate in AgriStability, as well as Production Insurance (for grains and oilseeds). Payments made under ORMP count as an advance on the provincial portion of AgriStability for the corresponding program year. Because ORMP is provincially funded, it has no impact on the federal portion of AgriStability payments. ORMP premiums are partly funded by the provincial government, which pays 40% of the cost of premiums, while producers pay the remaining 60%.

Saskatchewan Cattle and Hog Support Program (2009)

This program helped producers retain their breeding herds and address immediate cash flow needs.

Saskatchewan Feed and Forage Program - 2011 (2011 to 2012)

This program provided compensation to producers who had to transport additional feed to their livestock, or transport their livestock to alternate locations for feeding and grazing, due to feed shortages caused by excess moisture. In addition, financial assistance was provided to producers who had to reseed hay, forage or pasture land that had been damaged by excess moisture. This provincially-funded program replaces the initial Saskatchewan Feed and Forage Program (2010-2011), which was jointly offered by the provincial and federal governments, as part of AgriRecovery.

Self-Directed Risk Management (SDRM) (2005 to present)

SDRM is a provincial program designed to help Ontarian horticultural producers manage farm operation risk. Under the program, over 150 edible horticultural crops are eligible for coverage, including fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, herbs and spices, nuts, honey and maple products. To be eligible, producers must also participate in AgriStability, and meet the minimum amount of allowable net sales (ANS). Participating producers can deposit up to a maximum of 2% of their ANS into an account, and have their contribution matched by the provincial government. Payments made under SDRM count as an advance on the provincial portion of AgriStability for the corresponding program year. Because SDRM is provincially funded, it has no impact on the federal portion of AgriStability payments. Amounts received under Production Insurance for a crop also covered by SDRM will be deducted from SDRM payments.

Shoal Lakes Agriculture Flooding Assistance Program (2011)

The purpose of this program was to provide financial support to agriculture producers affected by chronic flooding in the Shoal Lakes Complex in the Interlake of Manitoba.

1. Land payments on a per acre basis were provided to farm operators to compensate for lost income related to agricultural production that cannot be realized due to flooded acres in 2010 and 2011.
2. Financial assistance for transportation costs incurred between April 1, 2011 and March 15, 2012 to those farm operators who needed to transport feed to livestock or livestock to feed, due to the flooding.

This payment was administered by the Manitoba Agriculture Corporation (MASC), with the assistance of Manitoba Agriculture, Food & Rural Initiatives (MAFRI).

Support Program for the Eradication of Chronic Wasting Disease in Cervids (CWD) (2019 to present)

This program implemented by La Financière agricole du Québec offers financial aid to cervid producers affected by the measures taken to eradicate CWD.

There are two categories of aid under this program:

• The first compensates cervid producers ordered to slaughter and dispose of animals under the Animal Health Protection Act.
• The second financially supports cervid producers required to implement sanitary measures stipulated under the Animal Health Protection Act.

Surplus Potato Management Response (2022)

The Surplus Potato Management Response was cost-shared between the federal and provincial governments and aimed to support PEI potato farmers impacted by trade disruptions. The Prince Edward Island Potato Board delivered the plan on behalf of the governments to manage potatoes that had been rendered surplus. Only the Destruction Program was included in the Direct payments data series.  The growers received up to 8.5 cents per pound to assist with the costs of environmentally-sound destruction of surplus potatoes.

Syndrome de dépérissement postsevrage (SDP) (2008 to 2010)

This MAPAQ (Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec) program granted financial support to Quebec feeder hog operations affected by Post Weaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome (PMWS).

Transitional Production Adjustment Program (1996) (1993 to 1997 and 1999 to 2008)

Under the Tree Fruit Revitalization Program, British Columbia orchardists were guaranteed specific annual revenue per acre during the first three years, following replant of orchards to new high density tree fruit varieties.

Tree Fruit Replant Program (previously known as Tree fruit grafting/budding and replant program) (2008 to 2011, 2012 to present)

In 2008, the Transitional Production Adjustment Program ended and the Tree fruit grafting/budding and replant program started. In July 2007, the federal and provincial governments jointly announced that they were investing $8 million to help British Columbia's tree fruit and grape industries adapt to changing markets. The cost was shared (60% federal, 40% provincial) and the program lasted for three years.  In 2012, the provincial government invested an additional $2 million to replant tree fruit orchards to expand domestic markets through high-quality products by targeting the planting of premium varieties. The program, which also includes a grafting and budding component, concluded in 2014. The 2015 program is the first year of a 7 year commitment by British Columbia of $8.4 million announced in Nov 2014. This is a British Columbia Agriculture Department program that shares the administration of the program with the British Columbia Fruit Growers Association under contract until 2016.

2019-2020 British Columbia AgriStability Enhancement Program

The British Columbia government is offering greater coverage to farmers who have lost income due to weather, trade challenges or natural disaster. The Program includes:

• Increasing the compensation rate, for all farms, from 70% to 80% on income margin losses greater than 30%. In other words, B.C. will be adding 14.3% to every AgriStability payment.
  • An AgriStability payment is triggered when a producer's current margin (allowable income less allowable expenses) drops more than 30% below their average historical margin (referred to as Reference Margin)
• Eliminating the Reference Margin Limit (RML) which reduced compensation for some farms.
  • Farms which have wide margins due to low eligible expenses will no longer have their compensation reduced due to the RML.

Unseeded Acreage Payment - 2006 (2006 to 2007)

This program provided a payment to Saskatchewan farmers who experienced excess moisture conditions prior to June 20, 2006 and were unable to seed 95% of the acres they would normally intend to seed.

Waterfowl Damage (1981 to present)

Waterfowl damage payment programs are designed to compensate producers for crop losses caused by waterfowl. Compensation is also available for cleaning excreta contaminated grain in some provinces, and for prevention management.

Also see Crop loss compensation, Livestock predation compensation and Wildlife damage compensation programs.

Wildlife Damage Compensation Program

British Columbia (2002 to present) - The British Columbia Wildlife Compensation program is part of an Agricultural Environment Partnership Initiative that includes the following programs: The Waterfowl Damage to Forage Fields in Delta, Wild Predator Loss Control and Compensation Program for Cattle and East Kootenay Agriculture Wildlife Pilot Project. These programs are designed to compensate producers for the losses incurred to crops and livestock due to wildlife.

New Brunswick (2014 to present) - This cost-shared program compensates producers who suffer livestock or crop losses due to wildlife. Compensation is available for specified crops and livestock for damage caused by eligible wildlife. The maximum compensation per producer is $50,000 per year. The New Brunswick Agricultural Insurance Commission (NBAIC) administers this program, applicants are not required to be an insurance client to receive compensation.

Nova Scotia (2008 to present) - This cost-shared program, announced in 2008, will help address some of the risks experienced by Nova Scotia farmers regarding damage to eligible agricultural products because of the activities of wildlife, including wildlife predation on livestock and damage to crops. Applicants are not required to have crop insurance.

Ontario (2008 to present) - The Ontario Wildlife Damage Compensation Program provides financial assistance to eligible applicants whose livestock and poultry have been injured or killed by wolves, coyotes, bears and other species of wildlife identified in the program guidelines, or whose bee-colonies, bee-hives and bee-hive related equipment have been damaged by bears, raccoons, deer and skunks. The program was funded by the provincial government up to the fiscal year of 2008/2009 and became part of Growing Forward - a federal, provincial and territorial initiative starting from fiscal year 2009/2010, when cost-sharing of the program began between the governments of Canada and Ontario.

Also see Crop loss compensation, Livestock predation compensation and Waterfowl damage programs.

Sources

Statistics are based on a census of all provincial and territorial liquor and cannabis authorities. Data are reconciled with annual reports of the liquor and cannabis authorities as well as other administrative sources and respondents are contacted to confirm or to explain variations.

Updates to the questionnaire and data tables in 2023

In 2023, the Control and Sale of Alcoholic Beverages program was updated to include cannabis and became the Control and Sale of Alcoholic Beverages and Cannabis. The related questionnaire, the "Government Liquor Authority: Report of Operations", was updated to include questions on non-medical cannabis sales and two new data tables were created to reflect the addition of cannabis.

Summary of the main updates to the questionnaire:

• A fourth section was added to the questionnaire to collect data on the sale of non-medical cannabis by product type for both value and weight.
• A fifth section was added to the questionnaire for cannabis finances.

The data from the fourth and fifth sections on the questionnaire are reflected in two new data tables. Table 10-10-0164 displays non-medical cannabis sales data by product and table 10-10-0165 displays government earnings derived from the sale of cannabis.

Updates to the questionnaire and CANSIM series in 2015

In 2015, the Control and Sale of Alcoholic Beverages program questionnaire, the “Government Liquor Authority: Report of Operations”, was updated after conducting qualitative testing involving field interviews with provincial and territorial liquor authorities'. Subsequently, the previous CANSIM tables were terminated and new CANSIM series were created to reflect these changes. A summary of the main updates are as follows.

A fourth beverage category was added to the questionnaire - Ciders, Coolers, and Other Refreshment Beverages (CCORB). International organizations including the World Health Organization publish alcohol statistics with four beverage categories: Spirits, Wine, Beer, and Other. Prior to the 2015 update, Ciders and Wine Coolers were included with Wines, Spirit Coolers were included with Spirits, and Beer Coolers were included with Beer. Other refreshment beverages not elsewhere classified could be reported as a Spirit, Wine, or Beer, at the discretion of the respondent. In aim of improving the comparability of these statistics, the fourth beverage category CCORB was added to the questionnaire and to its associated CANSIM series. As of fiscal year ending March 31st 2014, a majority of liquor authorities in Canada report sales using a variant of a fourth category that include ciders, coolers, “ready-to-drink” beverages, and/or other refreshment beverages.

Also in the beverage categories, the Beer category was updated to include four sub-categories: Light Beer, Regular Beer, Strong Beer, and Beer not elsewhere classified.

Absolute volume of sales of alcoholic beverages is calculated by multiplying the sales volume by the percentage of alcohol content for each product category. The percentages were modified in 2015 to reflect more accurate alcohol content based on an administrative data source obtained for this purpose. In the Spirits category, the percentage of alcohol content estimate is now 40% for Brandy, Gin, Rum, Whisky and Vodka. Spirit liqueurs are now classified at 20%, other spirits not elsewhere classified at 35%, and Alcohol at 90%. In the Wine category, the conversion rate is now estimated at 10% for sparkling wines. For non-sparkling wines, rosé wines are now estimated at 11%, white wines 12%, red wines 13%, fortified wines 18%, and other wines not elsewhere classified 15%. In the Beer category, light beer is now classified at 4%, regular beer 5% and strong beer 7%. For series continuity, beer not elsewhere classified is assigned an alcohol content of 5%, equivalent to a Regular Beer, and equivalent to the alcohol content assigned to Beer in the previous version of the questionnaire and CANSIM series. In the Ciders, Coolers, and Other Refreshment Beverages category, ciders are classified at 5.5%, wine coolers at 4.5%, spirit coolers at 6%, beer coolers at 7% and other refreshment beverages at 8%.

With the aim of improving the comparability of the number and types of retail outlets between each province and territory's diverse alcohol beverage distribution networks, the categorization of outlets section was updated. The previous version of the questionnaire classified outlets as either a government owned and operated liquor store, a liquor store agency, a wineries' retail outlet, or a breweries' retail outlet. The updated questionnaire and associated CANSIM series maintains the categories liquor store and liquor store agency, and updates wineries' and breweries' retail outlets into a broader third category: Other Retail Outlets. Other Retail Outlets includes wineries' and breweries' on-site and off-site retail outlets, ferment-on-premise facilities, general merchandise and grocery stores, and other retail outlets. This was done to better reflect the other types of retail outlets in operation across the country and to ensure full coverage of the distribution network.

The tax and other government revenue sections of the questionnaire and associated CANSIM series were updated to include all retail sales taxes, excise taxes, specific taxes on alcohol, and other reported and identifiable government revenues derived from the control and sale of alcoholic beverages. Retail sales taxes are estimated at the applicable rate by province and applied to gross sales. Specific taxes on alcoholic beverages are validated in corresponding provincial and territorial public accounts and annual reports of the liquor authority. Excise taxes are estimated using the reported excise taxes by product type from the Federal Public Accounts, and proportionally applying these amounts to each provincial and territorial share of sales in those categories by corresponding year. Additionally, the sales figures in all CANSIM series were revised to show the pre-tax sales. Previously, GST was included in the sales figures but other taxes were not.

Concepts and methods

Statistics on sales of alcoholic beverages by volume should not be equated with data on consumption. Sales volumes include only sales as reported by the liquor authorities and their agencies, including sales by wineries, breweries, and other outlets that operate under license from the liquor authorities. Consumption of alcoholic beverages would include all of these sales, as well as any unreported volumes of alcohol sold through ferment-on-premise operations or other outlets, and any unrecorded or illegal transactions. Statistics on sales of alcoholic beverages by dollar value should not be equated with consumer expenditures on alcoholic beverages. The sales data refer to the revenues received by liquor authorities and their agents, and a portion of these revenues include sales to licensed establishments such as bars and restaurants. The sales data do not, therefore, reflect the total amount spent by consumers on alcoholic beverages since the prices paid in licensed establishments are greater than the price paid by those establishments to the liquor authorities.

The value of sales of alcoholic beverages excludes all sales taxes, the value of returnable containers, and deposits. Per capita sales by value and volume are based on the population of inhabitants of 15 years of age and over. This is in accordance with the practice of Health Canada in presenting trends that are more realistic in the consumption of alcoholic beverages. This allows comparability with other countries, the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Health Organization as they also present alcohol per capita data using the population of inhabitants of 15 years of age and over. The population estimates are based on CANSIM table 051-0001 Estimates of Population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces, and territories, annual (persons).

Statistics on sales of non-medical cannabis do not account for the significant illicit cannabis market that still exists in Canada (Detailed household final consumption expenditure, provincial and territorial, annual). Sales values include only non-medical sales as reported by the cannabis authorities and outlets that operate under license from the cannabis authorities.

The value of sales of non-medical cannabis excludes all sales taxes. Per capita sales by value is based on the population of inhabitants of legal age to buy, use, possess, and grow recreational cannabis. The population estimates are based on table 17-10-0005-01 (formerly: CANSIM 051-0001) Estimates of Population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces, and territories, annual (persons).

Why are we conducting this survey?

This survey is conducted by Statistics Canada in order to collect the necessary information to support the Integrated Business Statistics Program (IBSP). This program combines various survey and administrative data to develop comprehensive measures of the Canadian economy.

The statistical information from the IBSP serves many purposes, including:

• Obtaining information on the supply of and/or demand for energy in Canada
• Enabling governmental agencies to fulfill their regulatory responsibilities in regards to public utilities
• Enabling all levels of government to establish informed policies in the energy area
• Assisting the business community in the corporate decision-making process.

Your information may also be used by Statistics Canada for other statistical and research purposes.

Your participation in this survey is required under the authority of the Statistics Act.

Other important information

Authorization to collect this information

Data are collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter S-19.

Confidentiality

By law, Statistics Canada is prohibited from releasing any information it collects that could identify any person, business, or organization, unless consent has been given by the respondent, or as permitted by the Statistics Act. Statistics Canada will use the information from this survey for statistical purposes only.

Record linkages

To enhance the data from this survey and to reduce the reporting burden, Statistics Canada may combine the acquired data with information from other surveys or from administrative sources.

Data-sharing agreements

To reduce respondent burden, Statistics Canada has entered into data-sharing agreements with provincial and territorial statistical agencies and other government organizations, which have agreed to keep the data confidential and use them only for statistical purposes. Statistics Canada will only share data from this survey with those organizations that have demonstrated a requirement to use the data.

Section 11 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with provincial and territorial statistical agencies that meet certain conditions. These agencies must have the legislative authority to collect the same information, on a mandatory basis, and the legislation must provide substantially the same provisions for confidentiality and penalties for disclosure of confidential information as the Statistics Act. Because these agencies have the legal authority to compel businesses to provide the same information, consent is not requested and businesses may not object to the sharing of the data.

For this survey, there are Section 11 agreements with the provincial and territorial statistical agencies of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Québec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and the Yukon. The shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

Section 12 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with federal, provincial or territorial government organizations.

Under Section 12, you may refuse to share your information with any of these organizations by writing a letter of objection to the Chief Statistician, specifying the organizations with which you do not want Statistics Canada to share your data and mailing it to the following address:

Chief Statistician of Canada
Statistics Canada
Attention of Director, Enterprise Statistics Division
150 Tunney's Pasture Driveway
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0T6

You may also contact us by email at statcan.esdhelpdesk-dsebureaudedepannage.statcan@statcan.gc.ca or by fax at 613-951-6583

For this survey, there are Section 12 agreements with the statistical agencies of Prince Edward Island, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut as well as with the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Natural Resources, New Brunswick Department of Environment and Local Government, the ministère des Finances du Québec, the ministère de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques du Québec, the Ministère de l'énergie et des ressources naturelles du Québec, the Manitoba Department of Growth, Enterprise and Trade, Alberta Energy, the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, the Canada Energy Regulator, Natural Resources Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada.

For agreements with provincial and territorial government organizations, the shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

Business or organization and contact information

1. Verify or provide the business or organization's legal and operating name and correct information if needed.

Note: Legal name modifications should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

Note: Press the help button (?) for additional information.

Legal Name

The legal name is one recognized by law, thus it is the name liable for pursuit or for debts incurred by the business or organization. In the case of a corporation, it is the legal name as fixed by its charter or the statute by which the corporation was created.

Modifications to the legal name should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

To indicate a legal name of another legal entity you should instead indicate it in question 3 by selecting 'Not currently operational' and then choosing the applicable reason and providing the legal name of this other entity along with any other requested information.

Operating Name

The operating name is a name the business or organization is commonly known as if different from its legal name. The operating name is synonymous with trade name.

• Legal name
• Operating name (if applicable)

2.Verify or provide the contact information for the designated contact person for the business or organization and correct information if needed.

Note: The designated contact person is the person who should receive this questionnaire. The designated contact person may not always be the one who actually completes the questionnaire.

• First name
• Last name
• Title
• Preferred language of communication
  • English
  • French
• Mailing address (number and street)
• City
• Province, territory or state
• Postal code or ZIP code
• Country
  • Canada
  • United States
• Email address
• Telephone number (including area code)
• Extension number (if applicable)
• The maximum number of characters is 10.
• Fax number (including area code)

3. Verify or provide the current operational status of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

• Operational
• Not currently operational (e.g., temporarily or permanently closed, change of ownership)
  Why is this business or organization not currently operational?
  • Seasonal operations
    • When did this business or organization close for the season?
      • Date
    • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
      • Date
  • Ceased operations
    • When did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Date
    • Why did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Bankruptcy
      • Liquidation
      • Dissolution
      • Other
    • Specify the other reasons why the operations ceased
  • Sold operations
    • When was this business or organization sold?
      • Date
    • What is the legal name of the buyer?
  • Amalgamated with other businesses or organizations
    • When did this business or organization amalgamate?
      • Date
    • What is the legal name of the resulting or continuing business or organization?
    • What are the legal names of the other amalgamated businesses or organizations?
  • Temporarily inactive but expected to re-open
    • When did this business or organization become temporarily inactive?
      • Date
    • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
      • Date
    • Why is this business or organization temporarily inactive?
  • No longer operating due to other reasons
    • When did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Date
    • Why did this business or organization cease operations?

4. Verify or provide the current main activity of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

Note: The described activity was assigned using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

Note: Press the help button (?) for additional information, including a detailed description of this activity with example activities and any applicable exclusions.

This question verifies the business or organization's current main activity as classified by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The NAICS is an industry classification system developed by the statistical agencies of Canada, Mexico and the United States. Created against the background of the North American Free Trade Agreement, it is designed to provide common definitions of the industrial structure of the three countries and a common statistical framework to facilitate the analysis of the three economies. NAICS is based on supply-side or production-oriented principles, to ensure that industrial data, classified to NAICS, are suitable for the analysis of production-related issues such as industrial performance.

The target entity for which NAICS is designed are businesses and other organizations engaged in the production of goods and services. They include farms, incorporated and unincorporated businesses and government business enterprises. They also include government institutions and agencies engaged in the production of marketed and non-marketed services, as well as organizations such as professional associations and unions and charitable or non-profit organizations and the employees of households.

The associated NAICS should reflect those activities conducted by the business or organizational units targeted by this questionnaire only, as identified in the 'Answering this questionnaire' section and which can be identified by the specified legal and operating name. The main activity is the activity which most defines the targeted business or organization's main purpose or reason for existence. For a business or organization that is for-profit, it is normally the activity that generates the majority of the revenue for the entity.

The NAICS classification contains a limited number of activity classes; the associated classification might be applicable for this business or organization even if it is not exactly how you would describe this business or organization's main activity.

Please note that any modifications to the main activity through your response to this question might not necessarily be reflected prior to the transmitting of subsequent questionnaires and as a result they may not contain this updated information.

The following is the detailed description including any applicable examples or exclusions for the classification currently associated with this business or organization.

Description and examples

• This is the current main activity
• This is not the current main activity
  • Provide a brief but precise description of this business or organization's main activity
  • e.g., breakfast cereal manufacturing, shoe store, software development

Main activity

5. You indicated that is not the current main activity.

Was this business or organization's main activity ever classified as: ?

• Yes
  • When did the main activity change?
  • Date
• No

6. Search and select the industry activity classification that best corresponds to this business or organization's main activity.

How to search:

• if desired, you can filter the search results by first selecting the business or organization's activity sector
• enter keywords or a brief description that best describe the business or organization's main activity
• press the Search button to search the database for an industry activity classification that best matches the keywords or description you provided
• select an industry activity classification from the list.

Select this business or organization's activity sector (optional)

• Farming or logging operation
• Construction company or general contractor
• Manufacturer
• Wholesaler
• Retailer
• Provider of passenger or freight transportation
• Provider of investment, savings or insurance products
• Real estate agency, real estate brokerage or leasing company
• Provider of professional, scientific or technical services
• Provider of health care or social services
• Restaurant, bar, hotel, motel or other lodging establishment
• Other sector

7. You have indicated that the current main activity of this business or organization is:

Main activity

Are there any other activities that contribute significantly (at least 10%) to this business or organization's revenue?

• Yes, there are other activities
  • Provide a brief but precise description of this business or organization's secondary activity
  • e.g., breakfast cereal manufacturing, shoe store, software development
• No, that is the only significant activity

8. Approximately what percentage of this business or organization's revenue is generated by each of the following activities?

When precise figures are not available, provide your best estimates.

Approximately what percentage of this business or organization's revenue is generated by each of the following activities?

	Percentage of revenue
Main activity
Secondary activity
All other activities
Total percentage

Method of collection

1. Indicate whether you will be answering the remaining questions or attaching files with the required information.

• Answering the remaining questions
• Attaching files

Attach files

2. Please attach the files that will provide the information required for the Annual Survey of Electric Power Thermal Generating Station Fuel Consumption (EPTG).

To attach files

• Press the Attach files button.
• Choose the file to attach. Multiple files can be attached.

Note:

• Each file must not exceed 5 MB.
• All attachments combined must not exceed 50 MB.
• The name and size of each file attached will be displayed on the page.

Industrial generator

1. Does this business produce electricity, for own use and/or for sale?

• Yes
• No

Fuel consumption for industrial generation

2. Are the reported fuels consumed for the purpose of electricity generation only?

• Yes
• No

Generation and efficiency

3. What is the percentage of the actual electrical generator efficiency?

Percentage

4. What percentage of the portion of steam is used to produce electricity?

Enter '0' if steam was not used to produce electricity.

Do not report negative values.

5. What is the percentage of the actual turbine efficiency?

Percentage

Cogeneration

6. Does this business generate both heat and electricity simultaneously from the same energy source at this location?

• Yes
• No

7. What is the primary purpose of the cogeneration?

• To generate electricity for own use
• To generate electricity for sale
• To generate heat energy for own use (e.g., steam)
• To generate heat energy for sale (e.g., steam)

8. How much heat was generated from the cogeneration process?

Heat energy (primary product) is defined as a product generated for the purpose of this business's own use or for sale. It does not include heat by-products, such as waste heat.

Quantity in Gigajoules (GJ)

9. How much of the generated heat was used for the business's own use?

Quantity in Gigajoules (GJ)

10. What is the primary purpose for generating electricity?

• To generate electricity for own use
• To generate electricity for sale

Sub-type for electricity generation

11. What sub-type method was used to generate electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Combined cycle
• Steam turbine
• Combustion engine
• Combustion turbine
• Other
  Specify other sub-type method used to generate electricity

Sub-type for electricity generation

12. Which of the following sub-type methods were used for the cogeneration process?

Select all that apply.

• Combined cycle
• Steam turbine
• Combustion engine
• Combustion turbine
• Other
  Specify other sub-type method used to generate electricity

Fuel used by generation method — Combined cycle

13. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity.

Which types of fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Solid fuels
  • e.g., coal, wood, municipal waste, biomass
• Liquids
  • e.g., bio-fuels, diesel, propane, heavy & light fuel oil
• Gaseous
  • e.g., natural gas, coke oven gas, methane, refinery fuel gas
• Other fuels used to generate electricity
  • e.g., waste heat

Fuel selection breakdown — Combined cycle

14. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Solid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Sub-bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Lignite
• Wood e.g., bark, hog-fuel
• Petroleum coke
• Agriculture biomass
• Other biomass e.g., biomass from food processing
• Other biomass - type unknown
• Municipal and other waste
• Other
  Specify other solid fuel used to generate electricity

15. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Liquids were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Biodiesel
• Ethanol
• Other biofuel
• Light fuel oil
• Heavy fuel oil
  • Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
  • Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
• Propane
• Diesel
• Orimulsion
• Spent pulping liquor
• Other
  Specify other liquid fuel used to generate electricity

16. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Gaseous fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Natural gas
• Coke oven gas
• Methane (land fill)
• Refinery fuel gas
• Other
  Specify other gaseous fuel used to generate electricity

17. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity.

What Other fuels were used to generate this electricity?

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

• Other
  Specify other type of fuel used to generate electricity

Fuel used by generation method — Steam turbine

18. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Solid fuels
  • e.g., coal, wood, municipal waste, biomass
• Liquids
  • e.g., bio-fuels, diesel, propane, heavy & light fuel oil
• Gaseous
  • e.g., natural gas, coke oven gas, methane, refinery fuel gas
• Other fuels used to generate electricity
  • e.g., waste heat

Fuel selection breakdown — Steam turbine

19. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Solid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Sub-bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Lignite
• Wood e.g., bark, hog-fuel
• Petroleum coke
• Agriculture biomass
• Other biomass e.g., biomass from food processing
• Other biomass - type unknown
• Municipal and other waste
• Other
  Specify other solid fuel used to generate electricity

20. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Liquids were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Biodiesel
• Ethanol
• Other biofuel
• Light fuel oil
• Heavy fuel oil
  • Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
  • Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
• Propane
• Diesel
• Orimulsion
• Spent pulping liquor
• Other
  Specify other liquid fuel used to generate electricity

21. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Gaseous fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Natural gas
• Coke oven gas
• Methane (land fill)
• Refinery fuel gas
• Other
  Specify other gaseous fuel used to generate electricity

22. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity.

What Other fuels were used to generate this electricity?

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

• Other
  Specify other type of fuel used to generate electricity

Fuel used by generation method — Combustion engine

23. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Solid fuels
  • e.g., coal, wood, municipal waste, biomass
• Liquids
  • e.g., bio-fuels, diesel, propane, heavy & light fuel oil
• Gaseous
  • e.g., natural gas, coke oven gas, methane, refinery fuel gas
• Other fuels used to generate electricity
  • e.g., waste heat

Fuel selection breakdown — Combustion engine

24. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Solid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Sub-bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Lignite
• Wood e.g., bark, hog-fuel
• Petroleum coke
• Agriculture biomass
• Other biomass e.g., biomass from food processing
• Other biomass - type unknown
• Municipal and other waste
• Other
  Specify other solid fuel used to generate electricity

25. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Liquids were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Biodiesel
• Ethanol
• Other biofuel
• Light fuel oil
• Heavy fuel oil
  • Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
  • Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
• Propane
• Diesel
• Orimulsion
• Spent pulping liquor
• Other
  Specify other liquid fuel used to generate electricity

26. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Gaseous fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Natural gas
• Coke oven gas
• Methane (land fill)
• Refinery fuel gas
• Other
  Specify other gaseous fuel used to generate electricity

27. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity. What Other fuels were used to generate this electricity?

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

• Other
  Specify other type of fuel used to generate electricity

Fuel used by generation method — Combustion turbine

28. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Solid fuels
  • e.g., coal, wood, municipal waste, biomass
• Liquids
  • e.g., bio-fuels, diesel, propane, heavy & light fuel oil
• Gaseous
  • e.g., natural gas, coke oven gas, methane, refinery fuel gas
• Other fuels used to generate electricity
  • e.g., waste heat

Fuel selection breakdown — Combustion turbine

29. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Solid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Sub-bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Lignite
• Wood e.g., bark, hog-fuel
• Petroleum coke
• Agriculture biomass
• Other biomass e.g., biomass from food processing
• Other biomass - type unknown
• Municipal and other waste
• Other
  Specify other solid fuel used to generate electricity

30. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Liquids were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Biodiesel
• Ethanol
• Other biofuel
• Light fuel oil
• Heavy fuel oil
  • Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
  • Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
• Propane
• Diesel
• Orimulsion
• Spent pulping liquor
• Other
  Specify other liquid fuel used to generate electricity

31. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Gaseous fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Natural gas
• Coke oven gas
• Methane (land fill)
• Refinery fuel gas
• Other
  Specify other gaseous fuel used to generate electricity

32. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity.

What Other fuels were used to generate this electricity?

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

• Other
  Specify other type of fuel used to generate electricity

Fuel used by generation method — Other sub-type

33. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity.

Which types of fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Solid fuels
  • e.g., coal, wood, municipal waste, biomass
• Liquids
  • e.g., bio-fuels, diesel, propane, heavy & light fuel oil
• Gaseous
  • e.g., natural gas, coke oven gas, methane, refinery fuel gas
• Other fuels used to generate electricity
  • e.g., waste heat

Fuel selection breakdown — Other sub-type

34. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Solid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Sub-bituminous coal
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Lignite
• Wood e.g., bark, hog-fuel
• Petroleum coke
• Agriculture biomass
• Other biomass e.g., biomass from food processing
• Other biomass - type unknown
• Municipal and other waste
• Other
  Specify other solid fuel used to generate electricity

35. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Liquid fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Biodiesel
• Ethanol
• Other biofuel
• Light fuel oil
• Heavy fuel oil
  • Purchased from Canadian companies
  • Imported from foreign countries
• Propane
• Diesel
• Orimulsion
• Spent pulping liquor
• Other
  Specify other liquid fuel used to generate electricity

36. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity.

Which types of Gaseous fuels were used to generate this electricity?

Select all that apply.

• Natural gas
• Coke oven gas
• Methane (land fill)
• Refinery fuel gas
• Other
  Specify other gaseous fuels used to generate electricity

37. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity.

What Other fuels were used to generate this electricity?

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

• Other
  Specify other type of fuel used to generate electricity

Questions for selected fuel types — Combined cycle

Please report electricity generation values as gross electricity generation values.

38. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

Heat output (kJ)/Total Energy Content of the Fuel (kJ).

The proportion of useful heat produced to the total potential energy available by burning the fuel.

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

	Percentage (%)
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

39. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the average heat content?

• Solid fuels: report in kJ/kg
• Liquids fuels: report in kJ/L
• Gaseous fuels: report in kJ/m3
• Other fuels: report in kJ/kg

What was the average heat content?

	Average heat content
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

40. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity/volume used and the total cost?

	Unit of measure	Quantity/volume used	CAN$ '000
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass — type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

Questions for selected fuel types — Combined cycle

Please report electricity generation values as gross electricity generation values.

41. This business indicated that Combined cycle was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption.

(Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

	Quantity in MWh
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

42. For Combined cycle, the total gross generation of electricity is:

Please review the values and if needed, press the Previous button at the bottom of the page to navigate to the previous pages to make any modifications.

For Combined cycle, the total gross generation of electricity is:

	Quantity in MWh
Total gross generation of electricity using Combined cycle

Questions for selected fuel types — Steam turbine

43. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

Heat output (kJ)/Total Energy Content of the Fuel (kJ).

The proportion of useful heat produced to the total potential energy available by burning the fuel.

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

	Percentage (%)
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

44. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the average heat content?

• Solid fuels: report in kJ/kg
• Liquids fuels: report in kJ/L
• Gaseous fuels: report in kJ/m3
• Other fuels: report in kJ/kg

What was the average heat content?

	Average heat content
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

45. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity/volume used and the total cost?

	Unit of measure	Quantity/volume used	CAN$ '000
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

46. This business indicated that Steam turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

Please report electricity generation values as gross electricity generation values.

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption.

(Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

	Quantity in MWh
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

47. For Steam turbine, the total gross generation of electricity is:

Please review the values and if needed, press the Previous button at the bottom of the page to navigate to the previous pages to make any modifications.

Total gross generation of electricity using Steam turbine

	Quantity in MWh
Total gross generation of electricity using Steam turbine

Questions for selected fuel types — Combustion engine

48. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

Heat output (kJ)/Total Energy Content of the Fuel (kJ).

The proportion of useful heat produced to the total potential energy available by burning the fuel.

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

	Percentage (%)
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

49. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the average heat content?

• Solid fuels: report in kJ/kg
• Liquids fuels: report in kJ/L
• Gaseous fuels: report in kJ/m3
• Other fuels: report in kJ/kg

What was the average heat content?

	Average heat content
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

50. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity/volume used and the total cost?

	Unit of measure	Quantity/volume used	CAN$ '000
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass — type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

51. This business indicated that Combustion engine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption

Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period.

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

	Quantity in MWh
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

52. For Combustion engine, the total gross generation of electricity is:

Total gross generation of electricity using Combustion engine

	Quantity in MWh
Total gross generation of electricity using Combustion engine

Questions for selected fuel types — Combustion turbine

53. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

Heat output (kJ)/Total Energy Content of the Fuel (kJ).

The proportion of useful heat produced to the total potential energy available by burning the fuel.

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

	Percentage (%)
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

54. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the average heat content?

• Solid fuels: report in kJ/kg
• Liquids fuels: report in kJ/L
• Gaseous fuels: report in kJ/m3
• Other fuels: report in kJ/kg

What was the average heat content?

	Average heat content
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

55. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity/volume used and the total cost?

	Unit of measure	Quantity/volume used	CAN$ '000
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass — type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

56. This business indicated that Combustion turbine was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

Please report electricity generation values as gross electricity generation values.

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption

(Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

	Quantity in MWh
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

57. For Combustion turbine, the total gross generation of electricity is:

Please review the values and if needed, press the Previous button at the bottom of the page to navigate to the previous pages to make any modifications.

For Combustion turbine, the total gross generation of electricity is

	Quantity in MWh
Total gross generation of electricity using Combustion turbine

Questions for selected fuel types — Other sub-type

58. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

Heat output (kJ)/Total Energy Content of the Fuel (kJ).

The proportion of useful heat produced to the total potential energy available by burning the fuel.

What percentage was the efficiency of the boiler?

	Percentage (%)
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

59. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the average heat content?

• Solid fuels: report in kJ/kg
• Liquids fuels: report in kJ/L
• Gaseous fuels: report in kJ/m3
• Other fuels: report in kJ/kg

What was the average heat content?

	Average heat content
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

60. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity/volume used and the total cost?

	Unit of measure	Quantity/volume used	CAN$ '000
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

If you are reporting for electricity generated using Waste heat, do not complete boiler efficiency, average heat content, quantity, or total cost.

61. This business indicated that [other sub-type method] was used to generate electricity. Please answer the following for the selected fuel types:

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption.

(Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

What was the quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

	Quantity in MWh
a. Bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
b. Bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
c. Sub-bituminous coal purchased from Canadian companies
d. Sub-bituminous coal imported from foreign countries
e. Lignite
f. Wood
g. Petroleum coke
h. Agriculture biomass
i. Other biomass
j. Other biomass - type unknown
k. Municipal and other waste
l. [Other solid fuel]
m. Biodiesel
n. Ethanol
o. Other biofuel
p. Light fuel oil
q. Heavy fuel oil purchased from Canadian companies
r. Heavy fuel oil imported from foreign countries
s. Propane
t. Diesel
u. Orimulsion
v. Spent pulping liquor
w. [Other liquid fuel]
x. Natural gas
y. Coke oven gas
z. Methane (land fill)
aa. Refinery fuel gas
ab. [Other gaseous fuel]
ac. [Other type of fuel]

62. For [other sub-type method], the total gross generation of electricity is:

Please review the values and if needed, press the Previous button at the bottom of the page to navigate to the previous pages to make any modifications.

For [other sub-type method] , the total net generation of electricity is:

	Quantity in MWh
Total gross generation of electricity using [other sub-type method]

Useful thermal energy — Combined cycle

63. This business indicated that it uses Combined cycle cogeneration process.

What was the useful thermal energy produced from this business for own use and sale?

Useful thermal energy produced: The amount of energy in the form of heat that is produced as a by-product of the generation of electricity and that is used for another application in a productive manner (e.g., the heating of industrial, commercial or residential space; steam used in an industrial process; etc.).

Own use consumption refers to consumption of self-generated thermal energy (excluding purchased) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

• Own use (quantity in GJ)
• Sale (quantity in GJ)

Useful thermal energy — Steam turbine

64. This business indicated that it uses Steam turbine cogeneration process.

What was the useful thermal energy produced from this business for own use and sale?

Useful thermal energy produced: The amount of energy in the form of heat that is produced as a by-product of the generation of electricity and that is used for another application in a productive manner (e.g., the heating of industrial, commercial or residential space; steam used in an industrial process; etc.).

Own use consumption refers to consumption of self-generated thermal energy (excluding purchased) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

• Own use (quantity in GJ)
• Sale (quantity in GJ)

Useful thermal energy — Combustion engine

65. This business indicated that it uses Combustion engine cogeneration process.

What was the useful thermal energy produced from this business for own use and sale?

Useful thermal energy produced: The amount of energy, in the form of heat, that is produced as a by-product of the generation of electricity and that is used for another application in a productive manner (e.g., the heating of industrial, commercial or residential space; steam used in an industrial process; etc.).

Own use consumption refers to consumption of self-generated thermal energy (excluding purchased) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

• Own use (quantity in GJ)
• Sale (quantity in GJ)

Useful thermal energy — Combustion turbine

66. This business indicated that it uses Combustion turbine cogeneration process.

What was the useful thermal energy produced from this business for own use and sale?

Useful thermal energy produced: The amount of energy in the form of heat that is produced as a by-product of the generation of electricity and that is used for another application in a productive manner (e.g., the heating of industrial, commercial or residential space; steam used in an industrial process; etc.).

Own use consumption refers to consumption of self-generated thermal energy (excluding purchased) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

• Own use (quantity in GJ)
• Sale (quantity in GJ)

Useful thermal energy — Other sub-type

67. This business indicated that it uses [other sub-type method] cogeneration process.

What was the useful thermal energy produced from this business for own use and sale?

Useful thermal energy produced: The amount of energy in the form of heat that is produced as a by-product of the generation of electricity and that is used for another application in a productive manner (e.g., the heating of industrial, commercial or residential space; steam used in an industrial process; etc.).

Own use consumption refers to consumption of self-generated thermal energy (excluding purchased) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

• Own use (quantity in GJ)
• Sale (quantity in GJ)

Uranium

68. What was the average heat content in gigajoules per metric tonne (Gj/MT) of Uranium?

Gigajoules per metric tonne (Gj/MT)

69. What quantity of Uranium was used and the total cost?

Unit of measure

• 100 cubic feet (Ccf)
• 33-pound cylinder
• Barrel
• Cubic Foot
• Cubic Metre
• Gallon: Imperial Gallon
• Gallon: U.S. Gallon
• Gigajoule
• Kilogram
• Kilolitre
• kWh
• Litre
• Long ton
• MWh
• Metric Tonne
• Mmbtu
• Pound
• Short ton
• ('000) Cubic Metres

Quantity

Total cost

70. What was the total gross quantity of electricity generated in megawatt-hours (MWh)?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period.

Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption.

(Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

MWh

Changes or events

1. Indicate any changes or events that affected the reported values for this business or organization, compared with the last reporting period.

Select all that apply.

• Strike or lock-out
• Exchange rate impact
• Price changes in goods or services sold
• Contracting out
• Organizational change
• Price changes in labour or raw materials
• Natural disaster
• Recession
• Change in product line
• Sold business or business units
• Expansion
• New or lost contract
• Plant closures
• Acquisition of business or business units
• Other
  Specify the other changes or events:
• No changes or events

Contact person

1. Statistics Canada may need to contact the person who completed this questionnaire for further information.

Is the provided given names and the provided family name the best person to contact?

• Yes
• No

Who is the best person to contact about this questionnaire?

• First name:
• Last name:
• Title:
• Email address:
• Telephone number (including area code):
• Extension number (if applicable):
• The maximum number of characters is 5.
• Fax number (including area code):

Feedback

1. How long did it take to complete this questionnaire?

Include the time spent gathering the necessary information.

• Hours:
• Minutes:

2. Do you have any comments about this questionnaire?